Iraq Protests Spark Concerns as U.S.-Iranian Tensions Grow

The widespread protests against corruption, poor governance, and rising unemployment come in the midst of political turmoil.

Iraqi protesters wave national flags in front of the provincial council building during a demonstration demanding better public services and jobs in Najaf on July 20.
AP Photo/Anmar Khalil
July 26, 2018, 8 p.m.

Iraq’s southern province of Basra has been rocked by protests throughout July over Baghdad’s practice of bleeding the province for oil revenue. Although many of the demonstrators have now returned home, the root causes of unrest remain unsolved—and could spell broader trouble for Iraq as the United States and Iran jockey for influence.

The protests began in early July when an intense heat wave struck southern Iraq, driving up demand for electricity and water. The utilities, already debilitated by years of war and neglect, collapsed under the strain. Shortages were exacerbated by Iran’s decision to squeeze Baghdad for outstanding debt by withholding critical electricity exports.

In Basra province, frustrated protesters took to the streets, trashing government and local militia offices. The protests quickly spread to nearby provinces and then to Baghdad. Among the protesters’ demands: an end to government corruption, reliable public utilities like water and electricity, and greater investment in job-placement programs. Despite sitting atop some of the largest oil reserves in Iraq, Basra is home to some of the direst poverty and unemployment in the country.

In response to the protests, an emergency response committee chaired by Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has pledged to expedite the release of government revenue to local infrastructure projects, and to increase the flow of water from the Tigris River. Iraqi security forces responded to the unrest with tear gas, and in many cases, live ammunition. Human Rights Watch released a report documenting “apparent excessive and unnecessary lethal force” against protesters in Basra.

“Security forces along with members of the Badr Organization, part of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces, fired on protesters at six of the eight protests investigated,” the report stated.

The protests come at a critical moment for Iraq. In May, populist cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s coalition won a surprise victory in the country's parliamentary elections over al-Abadi, a longtime U.S. ally, and the Iran-backed candidate Hadi al-Ameri. Al-Sadr is well-known for his blend of religious populism, grassroots activism, and opposition to foreign intervention—from Washington or Tehran.

“Loathsome as [al-Sadr] is from the American perspective because of the attacks on the United States during the occupation ... he is not the most sectarian of the politicians by any means,” said Daniel Serwer, director of conflict management at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

Al-Sadr has called for a suspension of the talks until the protesters’ demands are met. He has not, however, chosen to take the lead. In the past, al-Sadr would more or less “come and take over the protests,” unleashing his supporters onto the streets when it was politically advantageous, said Renad Mansour, a scholar at Chatham House.

“Today, he doesn’t seem like he wants to engage,” Mansour added.

This poses a problem for American and Iranian officials, who are forced to tread water until a new government is formed. Experts expressed skepticism that al-Sadr will choose to sacrifice his leverage as an opposition figure and join the governing coalition.

“He can either decide to go back into opposition, or … to negotiate with the parties to form a government,” said Joost Hiltermann, MENA program director at the International Crisis Group. “But then basically, you get yourself into the muck.”

The muck, experts say, is Iraq’s pervasive corruption. “Iraq is a place that, in theory, has all the resources it needs to support a pretty decent lifestyle on the part of most of its citizens,” Serwer said. “The problem is that a lot of the money disappears into corruption.”

Iraq ranked 166 out 176 countries on Transparency International’s 2018 corruption index.

Washington's reaction to the ongoing protests has been muted. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters that the Iraqi government intends to “address protesters’ grievances,” but that the protests were “an internal Iraqi matter.”

An official from the U.S. Agency for International Development said the U.S. “regret[s] the lives lost among both protesters and the security forces” and that the U.S. is ready to support efforts “to reform the economy, fight corruption, and create the jobs and provide the services that the Iraqi people deserve."

USAID currently runs an office in Iraq, known as Taqadum, which aims to improve provincial-level service delivery. The office could not immediately be reached for comment.

With demographic changes only expected to increase the strain on utilities in Iraq, several experts called on the U.S. to focus on curbing rampant cronyism rather than dumping more money into reconstruction.

“The international community should ... play a role in controlling the movement of illicit funds from inside Iraq to outside Iraq,” said Zaid Al-Ali, a scholar at International IDEA, an intergovernmental organization that supports democratic institutional reform.

Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani has spent millions on property in Virginia, al-Ali pointed out, and the Panama Papers leak revealed that former Iraqi Vice President Ayad Allawi used several offshore companies to purchase property in the United Kingdom.

“The problem in Iraq isn’t one of having enough money, or having enough people to be involved,” al-Ali said. “The problem is that the people who are ultimately in control today of the government aren’t interested.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
2 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
2 days ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
2 days ago

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

House Passes Funding Deal
2 days ago

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.