White House Making Life Miserable for Democratic Lawmakers, Reformers

If you support Obamacare, you can’t be happy with President Obama’s team.

President Barack Obama speaks at Temple Emanu-El November 6, 2013 in Dallas, Texas.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Nov. 7, 2013, 4:01 a.m.

Rather than im­ple­ment­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act, a law with the noble goal of help­ing mil­lions of un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans se­cure health in­sur­ance, the White House is dis­sem­bling. Rather than gov­ern­ing, Pres­id­ent Obama is cam­paign­ing. Every day, it gets worse. The latest:

On Wed­nes­day, seni­or White House ad­viser Dan Pfeif­fer tweeted his take on the Vir­gin­ia gubernat­ori­al elec­tion nar­rowly won by Demo­crat Terry McAul­iffe over right-wing light­weight Ken Cuc­cinelli: “Cuc­cinelli’s pro­file was based on de­feat­ing [Obama­care]; if he couldn’t get big bounce out of re­cent troubles; hard to see GOP strategy work­ing in 14.”

Set­ting aside the fac­tu­al weak­nesses of his ar­gu­ment, I replied to Pfeif­fer: “True only if White House man­ages to im­ple­ment #ACA. Big ‘if.’ Maybe fo­cus less in spin­ning it?” To which Pfeif­fer re­spon­ded: “I don’t dis­agree, has to be im­ple­men­ted and per­form­ance of web­site is un­ac­cept­able, fix­ing is every­one’s top pri­or­ity.”

The prob­lem is that man­aging polit­ic­al fal­lout, rather than hon­esty and com­pet­ence, seems to be the White House’s pri­or­ity. A lot has been writ­ten about Obama prom­ising that Amer­ic­ans could re­tain their health in­sur­ance if they like it (in­clud­ing here), as well as the pres­id­ent’s at­tempt to re­in­vent his­tory about his broken pledge (here). Caught red-handed, the White House shif­ted to a new tac­tic: blam­ing in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

“The pro­vi­sion in the law was the mani­fest­a­tion of the as­sur­ance that if you have a plan you want to keep, you can keep it,” White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney said this week. “In­sur­ance com­pan­ies that chose to strip away be­ne­fits from ex­ist­ing plans in the in­ter­im, that can­celed ex­ist­ing plans in the in­ter­im, they took away that grand­fath­er­ing op­por­tun­ity.  And that’s a real­ity.”

Not quite. As The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Glenn Kessler wrote in his fact-check column, “First of all, the ad­min­is­tra­tion wrote the rules that set the con­di­tions un­der which plans lose their grand­fath­er status. But more im­port­ant, the law has an ef­fect­ive date so far in the past that it vir­tu­ally guar­an­teed that the vast ma­jor­ity of people cur­rently in the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket would end up with a no­tice say­ing they needed to buy in­sur­ance on the Obama­care ex­changes. The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ef­fort to pin the blame on in­sur­ance com­pan­ies is a clas­sic case of mis­dir­ec­tion.”

Mis­dir­ec­tion—the pres­id­ent and his aides spe­cial­ize in that, and they’re de­ploy­ing the tac­tic against their own team now. Many Demo­crat­ic law­makers are in­ter­pret­ing McAul­iffe’s closer-than-ex­pec­ted vic­tory as a sign that voters might pun­ish them in 2014 for Obama­care. Some ven­ted their con­cerns dir­ectly to Obama on Wed­nes­day, the same day he flew to Dal­las to cam­paign for his health care law. Oth­ers went pub­lic, in­clud­ing Sen. Mark Be­gich of Alaska, who blas­ted the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s “mis­man­age­ment,” and Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, Mark Ud­all of Col­or­ado, and Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia, who pro­posed changes to the law.

Ac­cord­ing to exit polling, 53 per­cent of voters in Vir­gin­ia op­posed the health care law. Of those, 81 per­cent voted for Cuc­cinelli, who made Obama­care a battle cry in the cam­paign’s clos­ing days. Obama’s team dis­missed the con­cerns, point­ing to exit polls show­ing that just 27 per­cent of Vir­gin­ia voters iden­ti­fied health care as the most im­port­ant is­sue in the race and, of those, Cuc­cinelli won 49 per­cent to McAul­iffe’s 45 per­cent. Obama­care “is not as tox­ic as [Re­pub­lic­ans] want people to be­lieve,” said Mo El­leithee, a spokes­man for the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee.

True, the GOP has an ax to grind—and no off-year elec­tion res­ults can be ex­tra­pol­ated to pre­dict the next cycle’s res­ults. But El­leithee’s quote and Pfeif­fer’s tweet are a re­pu­di­ation of fel­low Demo­crats who have good reas­on to worry about Obama­care. At a time when Obama des­per­ately needs al­lies (his ap­prov­al rat­ings are drop­ping), the White House is in­sult­ing its friends.

They may not be exit-poll ex­perts, but Demo­crat­ic law­makers know the stakes. They know what hap­pens to their party—in 2014 and bey­ond—if re­forms sought for dec­ades get suf­foc­ated by gov­ern­ment in­com­pet­ence. They know what hap­pens to Obama if he keeps squan­der­ing his cred­ib­il­ity. They know what hap­pens to them—in their reelec­tion cam­paigns—if the White House doesn’t shift from spin­ning to fix­ing.

For sup­port­ers of health care re­form (dis­clos­ure: I’m one of them), the trend lines are bad. Every day, it gets worse.

What We're Following See More »
CYBER THREATS INCREASING
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

Source:
CLYBURN WEIGHING HIS OWN NOD
CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.”

Source:
MORE TENSIONS ON KOREAN PENINSULA
Senate Votes 96-0 to Sanction North Korea
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a unanimous vote Wednesday night, the Senate echoed the House’s move last month to stiffen sanctions against North Korea. The bill “would sanction anyone who engages in, facilitates or contributes to North Korea’s proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, arms-related materials, luxury goods, human rights abuses, activities undermining cyber security and the provision of materials for such activities.” Senate Democrats said they expect the president to sign the bill. In related news, after South Korea suspended operations at a jointly run power station in the North, Pyongyang declared the area a military zone and cut off a hotline between the two countries.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.

Source:
×