How Long Until Senate Leadership Resorts to the Nuclear Option?

The appointment of Janet Yellen probably won’t provide the last straw, but other coming nominations might.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 05: Janet Yellen (R), nominee for chair of the Federal Reserve, meets with Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) in his office at the Hart Senate Office Building, November 5, 2013 in Washington, DC. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate Yellen will replace outgoing Fed Chair Ben Bernanke. 
Getty Images
Michael Catalini
See more stories about...
Michael Catalini
Nov. 7, 2013, 4 p.m.

The Sen­ate’s nuc­le­ar-op­tion armistice is close to col­lapsing — but not quite yet.

Sen­ate Demo­crats bristled at how Re­pub­lic­ans blocked con­firm­a­tion votes last week on two of Pres­id­ent Obama’s nom­in­ees: Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., to head the agency over­see­ing Fan­nie Mae and Fred­die Mac, and Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett to serve on the U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the Dis­trict of Columbia Cir­cuit.

Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id hasn’t ruled out the op­tion of try­ing to change the Sen­ate’s rules to ban fili­busters against nom­in­a­tions and al­low for con­firm­a­tions on a simple-ma­jor­ity vote (the so-called nuc­le­ar op­tion), lead­er­ship aides say. Even Pres­id­ent Pro Tem­pore Patrick Leahy of Ver­mont took to the floor re­cently to say that if Re­pub­lic­ans do not re­verse them­selves, “drastic” meas­ures should be taken.

It is in this en­vir­on­ment that the highest-pro­file nom­in­a­tion of the fall ap­proaches. Janet Yel­len, Obama’s pick to suc­ceed Ben Bernanke as the head of the Fed­er­al Re­serve Board, will face a Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee hear­ing on Nov. 14. Yel­len, nom­in­ated in Oc­to­ber after a lib­er­al re­volt against Obama’s pre­sumptive choice of Lawrence Sum­mers, has been spend­ing time on Cap­it­ol Hill, meet­ing privately with sen­at­ors ahead of her hear­ing.

But Yel­len’s nom­in­a­tion is not likely to be the En­ola Gay in the nuc­le­ar-op­tion battle. “I don’t think this is the right line to draw in terms of mak­ing a polit­ic­al state­ment,” said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. Ad­ded Dwight Fet­tig, former staff dir­ect­or to Bank­ing Com­mit­tee Chair­man Tim John­son, D-S.D.: “Giv­en the im­port­ance of the Fed chair­man­ship, ex­pec­ted broad sup­port for Yel­len, and de­sire of both parties to avoid fur­ther mar­ket un­cer­tainty fol­low­ing the shut­down and debt-lim­it brink­man­ship, I don’t be­lieve either side will want to use this nom­in­a­tion to wage a polit­ic­al fight.”

Re­pub­lic­ans have plenty of poin­ted ques­tions for Yel­len on mon­et­ary policy, but they’re still pre­dict­ing that she will get the 60 votes she’ll need to over­come the holds against her, in­clud­ing one from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who wants to see an audit of the Fed. Bank­ing Com­mit­tee mem­ber Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee senses there’s no ap­pet­ite among fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans to block her. “I shouldn’t say things like this,” he said. “But, yeah, [she will get 60 votes.]”

Sen. Richard Shelby, the former top Re­pub­lic­an on the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee and a cur­rent pan­el mem­ber, voted against Yel­len as vice chair­wo­man. Even after a “cour­teous” meet­ing with her, Shelby said he has some prob­lems with her nom­in­a­tion. But will that be enough to vote against clo­ture and maybe ig­nite the nuc­le­ar spark? “I be­lieve, at the end of the day, the Fed­er­al Re­serve nom­in­ee — un­less bar­ring something aw­ful hap­pen­ing — should have prob­ably an up-or-down vote,” Shelby said.

Yel­len can ex­pect to face ques­tions about her time as head of the Fed­er­al Re­serve Bank of San Fran­cisco, wheth­er her views are too Keyne­sian, and wheth­er she fa­vors the Fed’s un­em­ploy­ment man­date over its in­fla­tion man­date. Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans cite in­fla­tion and quant­it­at­ive eas­ing as top wor­ries. “There is con­cern at this point about the mon­et­ary eas­ing the Fed’s go­ing through and wheth­er she’s go­ing to be care­ful so that we don’t get in­to an in­fla­tion­ary prob­lem down the road,” said Sen. John Ho­even, R-N.D.

Demo­crats are broadly sup­port­ive of Yel­len. Some, es­pe­cially Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts, will want to hear Yel­len’s views on the Fed’s reg­u­lat­ory role, but giv­en re­cent Demo­crat­ic dis­cip­line it would be sur­pris­ing to see de­fec­tions. So, if Yel­len has the votes to over­come Re­pub­lic­an holds, what sense does it make to flip the nuc­le­ar switch over her nom­in­a­tion? aides ask. “We’re not go­ing to pree­mpt­ively go nuc­le­ar,” a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide said.

But that doesn’t mean the de­bate over Sen­ate rules has been put on hold. “I think Mel Watt’s nom­in­a­tion has already re­opened that, and [weigh­ing the nuc­le­ar op­tion] is already well un­der­way,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., a Bank­ing Com­mit­tee mem­ber who sup­ports Yel­len and is one of the Sen­ate’s lead­ing pro­ponents of go­ing nuc­le­ar.

In­deed, Watt and Mil­lett could soon have com­pany as nom­in­ees un­able to win 60 votes to over­come fili­busters. Ar­guing that the D.C. Cir­cuit has too light a work­load and that judges ap­poin­ted by a Demo­crat­ic pres­id­ent would ad­opt a lib­er­al view on the bench, Re­pub­lic­ans have signaled they will block Obama nom­in­ees Cor­ne­lia T.L. Pil­lard and Robert L. Wilkins as well. Re­id’s of­fice said a clo­ture vote on their nom­in­a­tions could come as soon as Monday, but Re­pub­lic­ans are skep­tic­al of the nuc­le­ar saber-rat­tling, reas­on­ing that the Demo­crats know they could lose their ma­jor­ity some day.

“You can only run that drill so many times,” Cork­er said. “I’m sorry. I can’t take it ser­i­ously.”

If Re­id fol­lows through with an­oth­er show­down over nom­in­a­tions, it would be the first time since a Ju­ly truce, brokered in part by Sens. Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.Y., and John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., after a rare, all-sen­at­or meet­ing in the Old Sen­ate Cham­ber. The way Demo­crats see it, qual­i­fied nom­in­ees are en­titled to a simple-ma­jor­ity vote, and Re­pub­lic­ans are pick­ing on nom­in­ees whose agen­cies or po­s­i­tions they fun­da­ment­ally dis­agree with.

Re­pub­lic­ans sound weary of the fight and are ready to find out wheth­er Demo­crats are bluff­ing. “It’d be really bad form,” Cork­er said. “After all that oc­curred this sum­mer, to then come out and say — you might as well, if every time someone has con­cerns about nom­in­ees the nuc­le­ar op­tion comes up, you might as well be at a 51-vote threshold. If they do it, they do it.”

What We're Following See More »
HEADED TO PRESIDENT’S DESK
Trade Bill Would Ban Imports Made with Slave Labor
28 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

“A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban U.S. imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law.” The Senate approved the bill, which would also ban Internet taxes and overhaul trade laws, by a vote of 75-20. It now goes to President Obama.

Source:
TRUMP UP TO 44%
Sanders Closes to Within Seven Nationally in New Poll
41 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Bernie Sanders has closed to within seven points of Hillary Clinton in a new Morning Consult survey. Clinton leads 46%-39%. Consistent with the New Hampshire voting results, Clinton does best with retirees, while Sanders leads by 20 percentage points among those under 30. On the Republican side, Donald Trump is far ahead with 44% support. Trailing by a huge margin are Ted Cruz (17%), Ben Carson (10%) and Marco Rubio (10%).

Source:
LEGACY PLAY
Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

×