How Long Until Senate Leadership Resorts to the Nuclear Option?

The appointment of Janet Yellen probably won’t provide the last straw, but other coming nominations might.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 05: Janet Yellen (R), nominee for chair of the Federal Reserve, meets with Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) in his office at the Hart Senate Office Building, November 5, 2013 in Washington, DC. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate Yellen will replace outgoing Fed Chair Ben Bernanke. 
Getty Images
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin
Nov. 7, 2013, 4 p.m.

The Sen­ate’s nuc­le­ar-op­tion armistice is close to col­lapsing — but not quite yet.

Sen­ate Demo­crats bristled at how Re­pub­lic­ans blocked con­firm­a­tion votes last week on two of Pres­id­ent Obama’s nom­in­ees: Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C., to head the agency over­see­ing Fan­nie Mae and Fred­die Mac, and Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett to serve on the U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the Dis­trict of Columbia Cir­cuit.

Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id hasn’t ruled out the op­tion of try­ing to change the Sen­ate’s rules to ban fili­busters against nom­in­a­tions and al­low for con­firm­a­tions on a simple-ma­jor­ity vote (the so-called nuc­le­ar op­tion), lead­er­ship aides say. Even Pres­id­ent Pro Tem­pore Patrick Leahy of Ver­mont took to the floor re­cently to say that if Re­pub­lic­ans do not re­verse them­selves, “drastic” meas­ures should be taken.

It is in this en­vir­on­ment that the highest-pro­file nom­in­a­tion of the fall ap­proaches. Janet Yel­len, Obama’s pick to suc­ceed Ben Bernanke as the head of the Fed­er­al Re­serve Board, will face a Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee hear­ing on Nov. 14. Yel­len, nom­in­ated in Oc­to­ber after a lib­er­al re­volt against Obama’s pre­sumptive choice of Lawrence Sum­mers, has been spend­ing time on Cap­it­ol Hill, meet­ing privately with sen­at­ors ahead of her hear­ing.

But Yel­len’s nom­in­a­tion is not likely to be the En­ola Gay in the nuc­le­ar-op­tion battle. “I don’t think this is the right line to draw in terms of mak­ing a polit­ic­al state­ment,” said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. Ad­ded Dwight Fet­tig, former staff dir­ect­or to Bank­ing Com­mit­tee Chair­man Tim John­son, D-S.D.: “Giv­en the im­port­ance of the Fed chair­man­ship, ex­pec­ted broad sup­port for Yel­len, and de­sire of both parties to avoid fur­ther mar­ket un­cer­tainty fol­low­ing the shut­down and debt-lim­it brink­man­ship, I don’t be­lieve either side will want to use this nom­in­a­tion to wage a polit­ic­al fight.”

Re­pub­lic­ans have plenty of poin­ted ques­tions for Yel­len on mon­et­ary policy, but they’re still pre­dict­ing that she will get the 60 votes she’ll need to over­come the holds against her, in­clud­ing one from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who wants to see an audit of the Fed. Bank­ing Com­mit­tee mem­ber Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee senses there’s no ap­pet­ite among fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans to block her. “I shouldn’t say things like this,” he said. “But, yeah, [she will get 60 votes.]”

Sen. Richard Shelby, the former top Re­pub­lic­an on the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee and a cur­rent pan­el mem­ber, voted against Yel­len as vice chair­wo­man. Even after a “cour­teous” meet­ing with her, Shelby said he has some prob­lems with her nom­in­a­tion. But will that be enough to vote against clo­ture and maybe ig­nite the nuc­le­ar spark? “I be­lieve, at the end of the day, the Fed­er­al Re­serve nom­in­ee — un­less bar­ring something aw­ful hap­pen­ing — should have prob­ably an up-or-down vote,” Shelby said.

Yel­len can ex­pect to face ques­tions about her time as head of the Fed­er­al Re­serve Bank of San Fran­cisco, wheth­er her views are too Keyne­sian, and wheth­er she fa­vors the Fed’s un­em­ploy­ment man­date over its in­fla­tion man­date. Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans cite in­fla­tion and quant­it­at­ive eas­ing as top wor­ries. “There is con­cern at this point about the mon­et­ary eas­ing the Fed’s go­ing through and wheth­er she’s go­ing to be care­ful so that we don’t get in­to an in­fla­tion­ary prob­lem down the road,” said Sen. John Ho­even, R-N.D.

Demo­crats are broadly sup­port­ive of Yel­len. Some, es­pe­cially Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts, will want to hear Yel­len’s views on the Fed’s reg­u­lat­ory role, but giv­en re­cent Demo­crat­ic dis­cip­line it would be sur­pris­ing to see de­fec­tions. So, if Yel­len has the votes to over­come Re­pub­lic­an holds, what sense does it make to flip the nuc­le­ar switch over her nom­in­a­tion? aides ask. “We’re not go­ing to pree­mpt­ively go nuc­le­ar,” a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide said.

But that doesn’t mean the de­bate over Sen­ate rules has been put on hold. “I think Mel Watt’s nom­in­a­tion has already re­opened that, and [weigh­ing the nuc­le­ar op­tion] is already well un­der­way,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., a Bank­ing Com­mit­tee mem­ber who sup­ports Yel­len and is one of the Sen­ate’s lead­ing pro­ponents of go­ing nuc­le­ar.

In­deed, Watt and Mil­lett could soon have com­pany as nom­in­ees un­able to win 60 votes to over­come fili­busters. Ar­guing that the D.C. Cir­cuit has too light a work­load and that judges ap­poin­ted by a Demo­crat­ic pres­id­ent would ad­opt a lib­er­al view on the bench, Re­pub­lic­ans have signaled they will block Obama nom­in­ees Cor­ne­lia T.L. Pil­lard and Robert L. Wilkins as well. Re­id’s of­fice said a clo­ture vote on their nom­in­a­tions could come as soon as Monday, but Re­pub­lic­ans are skep­tic­al of the nuc­le­ar saber-rat­tling, reas­on­ing that the Demo­crats know they could lose their ma­jor­ity some day.

“You can only run that drill so many times,” Cork­er said. “I’m sorry. I can’t take it ser­i­ously.”

If Re­id fol­lows through with an­oth­er show­down over nom­in­a­tions, it would be the first time since a Ju­ly truce, brokered in part by Sens. Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.Y., and John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., after a rare, all-sen­at­or meet­ing in the Old Sen­ate Cham­ber. The way Demo­crats see it, qual­i­fied nom­in­ees are en­titled to a simple-ma­jor­ity vote, and Re­pub­lic­ans are pick­ing on nom­in­ees whose agen­cies or po­s­i­tions they fun­da­ment­ally dis­agree with.

Re­pub­lic­ans sound weary of the fight and are ready to find out wheth­er Demo­crats are bluff­ing. “It’d be really bad form,” Cork­er said. “After all that oc­curred this sum­mer, to then come out and say — you might as well, if every time someone has con­cerns about nom­in­ees the nuc­le­ar op­tion comes up, you might as well be at a 51-vote threshold. If they do it, they do it.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF IS PUSHING BACK
Trump Wants Scaramucci to Helm WH Communications
21 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump is expected to announce that Wall Street financier Anthony Scaramucci will be White House communications director, according to two sources familiar with the planning. Trump has left the role open since Mike Dubke resigned in May, and the President has vented frequently to his friends about the performance of his press operation." According to NBC News, Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus are resisting the move.

Source:
NEW GALLUP POLL
Trump’s Approval Rating a Record Low at 6-Month Point
40 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump's second-quarter job approval rating has fallen below what any other past president has gotten during the same time frame. A new Gallup poll found that Trump averaged a 38.8% rating between April 20 and July 19. The average approval rating for that time is 62%. President Obama was at the average during this time period, as was President Nixon. President Clinton is the only president who was below 50% by the second quarter, coming in with a 44% approval rating." There is also a large partisan gap. "Just 8% of Democrats approved of Trump's job performance during the second quarter, but 85% of Republicans did. Approval ratings have become increasingly polarized in recent administrations, but the 77-point gap for Trump is a new record."

Source:
ANNOUNCEMENT IMMINENT
Government to Bar Americans from Visiting N. Korea
41 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The US government will soon prohibit American citizens from traveling to North Korea, according to two tour groups that cater to Western tourists who want to visit the secretive country. The US will announce the ban within a couple of days, said Simon Cockerell, general manager of Beijing-based Koryo Tours. The agency was informed of the development by officials of the Swedish government, which represents America's interests in North Korea, he told CNN."

Source:
NEA AND NEH GET $145 MIL EACH
House Appropriations Ignore Trump’s Proposed Arts Cuts
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Federal arts and humanities programs targeted for elimination by the Trump administration would get a lifeline from House appropriators willing to ignore the president’s proposal and keep them running. The $31.5 billion fiscal 2018 Interior-Environment spending bill approved by the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday includes $145 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. While that’s still a 3.2 percent cut from the fiscal year 2017 enacted level, it is more than $116 million above Trump’s budget request. The National Endowment for the Humanities would receive $145 million in fiscal 2018, which is $103.7 million above the White House budget request."

Source:
469 WITHDRAWN, 391 BEING REEVALUATED
Trump Nixes Hundreds of Obama Regs
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The White House’s Office of Management and Budget detailed Thursday how it would jettison hundreds of existing or planned regulations as part of its larger push to ease federal restrictions on the private sector, upending federal policies on labor, the environment and public health. ... The Trump administration said it was pulling or suspending 860 pending regulations."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login