Can the Senate Crack Down on NSA Spying?

Some reformers say waiting to gather support may be a stronger move.

John Inglis (L), deputy director of the National Security Agency, speaks with committee chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) after testifying during a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill July 31, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee held the hearing on privacy rights and oversight related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act amid leaks that the US National Security Agency has engaged in widespread collection of records of domestic phone calls in the United States.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Nov. 7, 2013, 2:06 p.m.

Con­ven­tion­al wis­dom holds that a de­bate on Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency sur­veil­lance tac­tics would take place when the Sen­ate takes up the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill later this month.

But a grow­ing chor­us of re­form sup­port­ers are rais­ing doubts that it will play out on the de­fense bill, even as law­makers in both parties are itch­ing to take on the is­sue with time run­ning out on the le­gis­lat­ive cal­en­dar for the year.

“That would be the worst pos­sible place,” said Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., one of the lead­ing ad­voc­ates of re­forms that would ban the NSA’s bulk col­lec­tion of phone re­cords.

“Just think of what that bill is,” Leahy said of the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion. “Let’s have it where we can have a real de­bate, not on, ‘How can we best do everything the ad­min­is­tra­tion and the De­fense De­part­ment tells us to do?’ No. We need a real de­bate.”

There’s a con­flu­ence of reas­ons the NSA is­sue could be pushed off — in­clud­ing the fact that some re­form ad­voc­ates say they may need more time to win over sup­port.

“I’ve been talk­ing to some of the oth­er sup­port­ers of the bill about it, and it is an open ques­tion right now wheth­er we will try to move for­ward,” said Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al, D-Conn., adding, “If we have some as­sur­ance that there will be oth­er op­por­tun­it­ies, wait­ing may give us more time and en­hance op­por­tun­it­ies to gain sup­port.”

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said he is weigh­ing what a Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee de­bate first might do for the re­form ef­fort on the floor. “My take is the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee has not had the op­por­tun­ity to con­sider this,” he said. “What re­formers are try­ing to do is max­im­ize our in­flu­ence. We are clearly gain­ing sup­port every single day.”

Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee lead­ers Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., and Saxby Cham­b­liss, R-Ga., passed a bill through their com­mit­tee that largely pro­tects cur­rent NSA prac­tices by adding more ac­count­ab­il­ity and trans­par­ency. But neither sen­at­or is gun­ning to bring it up on the de­fense bill. Cham­b­liss does not want that de­bate there, and Fein­stein said she plans to of­fer her amend­ment on the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion only if someone else ini­ti­ates broad­er NSA re­form.

“If some­body does put something on the de­fense bill, I will do it,” she said.

Leahy is de­term­ined to work through his com­mit­tee pro­cess to build sup­port for his bill. “Of course, that’s the way it should be,” he said.

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., an­oth­er re­form cham­pi­on, is hold­ing a hear­ing on the is­sue in the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee’s Pri­vacy, Tech­no­logy, and the Law Sub­com­mit­tee next week. And Leahy plans to bring in NSA and in­tel­li­gence lead­ers for a full com­mit­tee hear­ing Nov. 20.

Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., is slated to testi­fy in sup­port of re­form at next week’s hear­ing, but he’s de­fer­ring to Leahy’s lead.

“We’ll see what Leahy thinks—if he wants to bring it up,” Heller said. “There’s a hear­ing next week on it, so we are go­ing to have an op­por­tun­ity to have the dis­cus­sion. If Leahy wants to take the dis­cus­sion to the next step, I’ll sup­port him on that, but let’s see how the hear­ing goes. I think at that point we’ll de­cide how far we want to take it.”

There are oth­er factors push­ing against an NSA de­bate now.

Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in, D-Mich., is ask­ing his col­leagues to save the de­bate for an­oth­er day.

An­oth­er po­ten­tial hindrance is lead­er­ship’s sched­ule. Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., wants to get the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion done be­fore Thanks­giv­ing. That is an in­cred­ibly am­bi­tious time frame, giv­en that oth­er items on the agenda would prob­ably leave it only about a week. There are sev­er­al de­fense-re­lated is­sues ex­pec­ted to be de­bated when it comes up, in­clud­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al as­saults, Ir­an sanc­tions, and the fate of de­tain­ees at Guantanamo Bay. If Re­id holds to the tight time frame, it might not al­low time for a de­bate on the NSA.

The com­pel­ling reas­on to use the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act as a vehicle is that it is com­ing up soon and is one of the few bills that re­li­ably man­ages to make its way in­to law every year. The Sen­ate is out the week after Thanks­giv­ing and plans to be in ses­sion for only two weeks in Decem­ber, so the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill could well be the last le­gis­lat­ive vehicle for the is­sue this year.

That lure could still prove ir­res­ist­ible, par­tic­u­larly for those who just want to raise the is­sue. Sev­er­al re­form ad­voc­ates, in­clud­ing Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., are still weigh­ing wheth­er to ask for a vote on an amend­ment.

As it stands, seni­or Sen­ate aides say privately that they do not be­lieve the votes are there to sig­ni­fic­antly clamp down on the NSA’s data-col­lec­tion prac­tices. They reas­on that at this stage a more likely out­come would be something along the lines of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee bill.

And des­pite the fast-grow­ing pop­ular­ity of a bill from Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, R-Wis., to end the NSA’s bulk data-col­lec­tion prac­tices, which has nearly 90 co­spon­sors, House lead­ers cur­rently have no plans to take it up.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×