How Mobile Apps Could Transform Rural Health Care

Telemedicine is transforming health care for Americans. But the system still needs work.

National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Nov. 11, 2013, midnight

When it comes to rur­al health care, broad­band is a mat­ter of life or death.

Rur­al res­id­ents seek ser­vices from primary-care doc­tors and emer­gency rooms, which works if the pa­tient doesn’t have a chron­ic or life-threat­en­ing con­di­tion. But when they do, rur­al pa­tients don’t al­ways have ac­cess to the most com­pre­hens­ive care. Med­ic­al spe­cial­ists prac­tice in cit­ies, leav­ing rur­al doc­tors to weigh the choice between send­ing a pa­tient away for treat­ment — cost­ing both the pa­tient and prac­tice — or keep­ing them in house, where they risk pa­tient out­comes but keep the paycheck.

Ac­cess to health ser­vices was an obstacle in rur­al Col­or­ado un­til 2008, when the Col­or­ado Tele­health Net­work was formed. Rur­al fa­cil­it­ies could trans­mit X-ray res­ults and oth­er dia­gnost­ic tests to lar­ger pro­viders in a mat­ter of minutes, and treat­ment re­com­mend­a­tions from ex­perts in urb­an cen­ters could be car­ried out re­motely. Today, 201 fa­cil­it­ies are con­nec­ted to the broad­band net­work that ex­tends across Col­or­ado’s 104,000 square miles.

But ac­cess to care doesn’t im­prove pop­u­la­tion health overnight — es­pe­cially for rur­al areas where one in four people re­main un­in­sured. The next fron­ti­er for im­prov­ing rur­al pa­tients’ ac­cess to health ser­vices is mo­bile ap­plic­a­tions.

“There’s a cer­tain glam­our about this new tech­no­logy,” said Ed Bo­stick, CTN’s ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or. “But there’s also push­back that it is just one more thing for people to di­gest.”

As smart­phones be­come a way of life, Amer­ica is on the cusp of turn­ing telemedi­cine and mo­bile tech­no­logy in­to daily health prac­tice.

“I think we could see tre­mend­ous growth in the next five years,” said Mur­ray Aitken, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the IMS In­sti­tute for Health­care In­form­at­ics, which provides policy makers with in­sight in­to the health care in­dustry.

There are chal­lenges, however, that keep tech­no­lo­gic­al ad­vances in health care from en­ter­ing main­stream prac­tice. Im­per­fect pay­ment sys­tems, lag­ging gov­ern­ment­al reg­u­la­tions, con­sumers’ pri­vacy and se­cur­ity con­cerns, sat­ur­a­tion of the app mar­ket, and a lack of re­search show­ing im­proved health out­comes rep­res­ent some of the hurdles telemedi­cine and mo­bile health apps have yet to over­come.

On iTunes, for ex­ample, there are more than 40,000 health apps, but that’s few­er than 10 per­cent of all apps in the store. Moreover, roughly 50 per­cent of health apps have been down­loaded few­er than 500 times, which Aitken says sig­nals a lack of aware­ness about which apps are the best to use.

“Apps can clearly be a very cost-ef­fect­ive means for pa­tients to en­gage in their health care,” Aitken said. “They’re help­ing keep pa­tients out of doc­tors’ of­fices.”

While apps are not a sub­sti­tute for doc­tors’ vis­its, pro­viders are con­fid­ent that in­teg­rat­ing apps in­to health care could re­duce doc­tors vis­its and help mit­ig­ate the doc­tor short­age that will be ex­acer­bated by the in­flux of newly in­sured con­sumers once the Af­ford­able Care Act takes full ef­fect next year.

“We can see that apps have the abil­ity to cap­ture in­form­a­tion about a pa­tient and trans­mit that data to a doc­tor re­motely,” Aitken said.

It’s not such an easy choice for doc­tors, be­cause few­er pa­tient vis­its mean lower pay. Al­though laws vary by state, in­sur­ance com­pan­ies are re­luct­ant to re­im­burse phys­i­cians for mo­bile apps and telemedi­cine.

“In­sur­ance com­pan­ies want to see evid­ence that this is an ef­fect­ive de­liv­ery meth­od of health care,” said Dar­rell West, found­ing dir­ect­or of the Cen­ter for Tech­no­logy In­nov­a­tion at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion.

That means cre­at­ing more pi­lot pro­grams where in­surers can see pos­it­ive res­ults.

In Arkan­sas, for in­stance, rur­al pa­tients seek­ing gyneco­lo­gic­al and ob­stet­rics care have be­nefited from telemedi­cine, even though fixes to the pay­ment struc­ture have yet to be made, said Curtis Lowery, chair­man of the Uni­versity of Arkan­sas med­ic­al sci­ences de­part­ment of ob­stet­rics and gyneco­logy.

“If the pa­tients need to be seen by the uni­versity, then we’d have them come in,” Lowery said. “But few­er than 10 per­cent ever come to the uni­versity.”

About 48 per­cent of Arkansans live in rur­al areas, ac­cord­ing to the uni­versity’s data. At telemedi­cine hubs in re­mote parts of the state, ul­tra­sounds are streamed to UAMS for eval­u­ation.

“In­stead of send­ing a pa­tient away and nev­er com­ing back,” Lowery said, “it’s as if a vir­tu­al spe­cial­ist is prac­ti­cing with you.”

That has proven to be one way of re­mov­ing the pres­sure of a paycheck from de­term­in­ing a pa­tient’s course of treat­ment. Medi­care and Medi­caid re­im­burse for telemedi­cine, but some private in­surers are still hold­ing out.

State li­cens­ing boards also haven’t caught up with the tech­no­logy, which cre­ates ad­di­tion­al hurdles for doc­tors who are will­ing to look at pa­tient-sub­mit­ted pho­tos and video to make dia­gnoses.

“The li­cens­ing boards ex­ist to en­sure the phys­i­cians have met the cre­den­tials to be provid­ing care,” Lowery said. “But in Arkan­sas, a phys­i­cian de­veloped an app for people to send pho­tos of skin le­sions, and then he’d eval­u­ate and send his dia­gnos­is back to them. What if that’s not a qual­ity im­age? Should he be able to do that or not?”

But con­sumer de­mand for the ser­vices is there. Es­pe­cially for rur­al pop­u­la­tions, it is faster and cheap­er to dia­gnose re­motely.The un­answered ques­tion is wheth­er it im­proves health out­comes.

“We’re all hop­ing that apps change be­ha­vi­or,” Bo­stick said.

There isn’t enough re­search to lay the ground­work for a case that mo­bile apps and telemedi­cine im­prove health out­comes, which is one of the reas­ons in­surers and the app-de­vel­op­ing com­munity are re­luct­ant to jump in, Aitken said.

Re­gard­less of health out­comes, mo­bile apps and telemedi­cine do im­prove ac­cess to health ser­vices for rur­al Amer­ic­ans. And with one of every five un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans clas­si­fied as rur­al, mo­bile health tech­no­logy is the next battle­ground for open­ing path­ways to care.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
4 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
×