Why Would Anyone Want to Be the Next Al Gore?

Sheldon Whitehouse’s lonely climate fight.

WASHINGTON - JUNE 11: U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) (L) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) (R) listen during a news conference after the Senate Democrats failed to invoke cloture to proceed to a no confidence vote in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales June 11, 2007 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans have blocked a Democratic effort to vote no confidence on Gonzales.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
Nov. 12, 2013, 4 p.m.

When Shel­don White­house makes his 50th cli­mate speech on the Sen­ate floor this week, he’ll likely face a deser­ted cham­ber. Cli­mate change is about as dead a polit­ic­al plat­form as you can find these days, something most politi­cians will go to great lengths to avoid. But the Rhode Is­land Demo­crat is in­tent on mak­ing it his is­sue, even if it seems like he’s talk­ing to him­self week after week.

Does it feel lonely, be­ing the only one up there talk­ing about it?

“Yeah, ab­so­lutely,” White­house said. “What’s frus­trat­ing about feel­ing lonely is that I think this is an is­sue that we would win, in that the Amer­ic­an pub­lic would win, if we simply put our minds to it, put our at­ten­tion to it and took it up.”

At 58, and after just a few years in Wash­ing­ton, the former state at­tor­ney gen­er­al has po­si­tioned him­self to be the next Al Gore, giv­ing weekly floor speeches on the per­ils of car­bon pol­lu­tion. At an event on Cap­it­ol Hill earli­er this year, the former vice pres­id­ent seemed to pass him the pro­ver­bi­al cli­mate torch. “Shel­don White­house has be­come the lead­ing United States Sen­ate ad­voc­ate for solv­ing the cli­mate crisis, and you ought to be very proud,” Gore told an audi­ence of Rhode Is­land lead­ers who’d gathered as part of White­house’s an­nu­al en­ergy and en­vir­on­ment event.

Why any­one would want that mantle, though, is an­oth­er ques­tion.

Gore’s rise and fall have been well-doc­u­mented. In the years since his Oscar-win­ning doc­u­ment­ary An In­con­veni­ent Truth and sub­sequent No­bel Peace Prize, the act­iv­ist group Gore cre­ated has waned, and with it, its mis­sion to build a glob­al non­par­tis­an move­ment around cli­mate change.

Its struggles began in 2009, when the cap and trade bill failed in the Sen­ate. There’s no Second Com­ing in sight. Any move to push a cli­mate-change bill for­ward is com­pletely at odds with cur­rent polit­ic­al real­ity: Com­pre­hens­ive le­gis­la­tion has zero chance of pas­sage in the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House and little chance even in the Demo­crat-con­trolled Sen­ate.

White­house knows this, and to date has fo­cused his ef­forts on simply mak­ing noise — edu­cated, in­formed, de­lib­er­ate noise. Work­ing with Henry Wax­man in the House, he formed a bicam­er­al cli­mate task force of a few dozen Demo­crat­ic law­makers who give speeches about cli­mate change on the House and Sen­ate floors every day Con­gress is in ses­sion. “Si­lence is the en­emy,” White­house said.

He’s cer­tainly not the only cli­mate hawk in the Sen­ate. There’s Sen. Bar­bara Box­er, chair­man of the En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee; John Kerry, who, be­fore he left to head up the State De­part­ment, spent the bet­ter part of 2009 and 2010 tucked away in a host of Sen­ate of­fices, pros­elyt­iz­ing on cli­mate change; and Ed­ward Mar­key, the staunch Mas­sachu­setts en­vir­on­ment­al­ist who re­cently moved over from the House fol­low­ing a spe­cial elec­tion.

So far White­house, a ju­ni­or sen­at­or who’s been try­ing to find an is­sue on which to dis­tin­guish him­self, has been the most vo­cal on the is­sue. But it’s Wax­man, whom White­house lis­ted as among his ment­ors, who’s been the le­gis­lat­ive muscle be­hind the move­ment. Had Wax­man not over­reached with the cli­mate bill in 2009, he might have mas­ter­minded cli­mate’s sig­na­ture re­form.

Now, however, he and White­house are locked in a wait­ing game. “It took us a dec­ade to get AIDS le­gis­la­tion. It took us 15 years to get to­bacco reg­u­la­tions,” Wax­man told Na­tion­al Journ­al earli­er this year. “Some­times when you play the long game, you get a stronger res­ult. You put everything in place, you do the work, and you wait for the right mo­ment to ar­rive.”

Cli­mate policy has inched for­ward in a num­ber of the states most af­fected by Hur­ricane Sandy, but the broad­er U.S. pub­lic has shown little in­terest in ex­tend­ing that con­ver­sa­tion at the na­tion­al level. For Rhode Is­land, known as the Ocean state, the ef­fects of cli­mate change can have ser­i­ous im­plic­a­tions along its al­most 400 miles of coast­line and in its coastal rivers, in­dus­tries, and in­fra­struc­ture. A change of just a few de­grees in the tem­per­at­ure of the wa­ter, for in­stance, can mean the death of an en­tire fish­ing in­dustry.

“It’s really on people’s minds,” said Janet Co­it, dir­ect­or of the state’s De­part­ment of En­vir­on­ment­al Man­age­ment, who over­sees nat­ur­al-re­source is­sues and en­vir­on­ment­al pro­tec­tion is­sues in Rhode Is­land. “Even since I’ve had this job, we’ve had week-long power out­ages from Sandy to Irene, and when we have these storms it really gets people’s at­ten­tion.”

But na­tion­ally, that’s not the case.

White­house in­sists it’s just a mat­ter of time. “The fu­ture is on our side, in­ev­it­ab­il­ity is on our side, the eco­nom­ics are on our side, the facts are on our side, sci­ence is on our side and the frus­tra­tion is, why am I alone now when this is a battle if we simply joined it, we’d win?”

There’s a stick­er on the com­puter on White­house’s desk that quotes Win­ston Churchill: “Nev­er, nev­er, nev­er give up.” Corny, maybe, but apt.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.