Connecticut gubernatorial hopeful Tom Foley is already airing campaign ads on TV — but not in his home state.
The 2010 Republican nominee, who is exploring another bid for the state’s top office, launched the first TV spot of the 2014 Nutmeg State race on Monday. The ad, which is running only on cable in New York City, invites city residents wary of Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio’s progressive policies to consider moving to Connecticut next year when the state “will probably elect a new governor.”
The spot opens with an image of a recent New York Post cover that put de Blasio’s face next to a Soviet hammer and sickle. “Hey, New York City,” Foley says while talking directly to the camera. “With your new mayor, I know many of you are thinking about leaving. Connecticut, with the same progressive policies you’re about to see in your city, may not be first on your mind. But wait a second. Connecticut next year will probably elect a new governor. When it does, Connecticut once again will be the place that people want to be in the Northeast.”
The “small” ad buy was scheduled to begin Monday on Fox News Channel and NY1 in New York City, according to the Hartford Courant. The unusual tactic of running the ad out of state speaks to what is probably Foley’s true aim: Generating a lot of attention and raising money as a result.
So far, it has worked, at least in the attention department: Foley’s ad generated coverage late Monday in outlets throughout Connecticut and New York. Asked Tuesday if he was concerned the strategy might backfire, Foley laughed and simply said, “No.”
Foley lost to Democratic Gov. Dannel Malloy by just 1 percentage point in 2010, and Republicans are hopeful that Malloy’s mediocre polling numbers give them a solid chance to knock him off next year. But Foley faces a crowded GOP primary field, with state Senate Minority Leader John McKinney, state Sen. Toni Boucher, and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton, who was Foley’s running mate in 2010, all readying campaigns of their own.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.