Former President Carter called for a national moratorium on capital punishment in the United States on Tuesday, declaring in a speech, “We should abolish the death penalty here and throughout the world.”
Carter proceeded to meticulously enumerate the oft-cited ethical, financial, and legal reasons for his opposition, which are nothing new for the octogenarian; he expressed doubt about the death penalty as far back as his presidential campaigns.
“Perhaps the strongest argument against the death penalty is its extreme bias against the poor, minorities, and those with mental disabilities,” Carter said at a national symposium hosted by the American Bar Association at the Carter Center in Atlanta. “It’s hard to imagine a rich white man or woman going to the death chamber after being defended by expensive lawyers.”
Carter’s remarks come at a time when support for the death penalty among Americans has fallen to 60 percent, the lowest reading since 1972 and down from a mid-1990s high of 80 percent. States with capital punishment are also facing unprecedented challenges in their efforts to secure the drugs necessary to perform executions by way of lethal injection.
But 60 percent is still a strong majority, and Carter’s political battle is nothing if not lonely. Capital punishment has not infiltrated mainstream political debate since at least 1988, when Vice President Bush effectively used Democratic opponent Michael Dukakis’s opposition to paint him as soft on crime. Virtually every presidential candidate during the past several cycles has supported the death penalty, although former New York Gov. Mario Cuomo condemned the practice in 2011 for killing “many innocent people.”
Still, public sentiment on capital punishment moves more than on abortion rights, and Carter sees other options for banning the practice, including the Supreme Court. He suggested that the all the legal system needed was a punch in the gut to consider resuming the moratorium handed down in 1972 as a result of the Supreme Court’s Furman v. Georgia opinion.
“The Supreme Court is heavily influenced by public opinion,” Carter said. “I don’t think there’s any doubt that the Supreme Court changes its mind on a number of issues, particularly social issues, because of public opinion.”
What We're Following See More »
"An emerging theory among U.S. military investigators is that the Army Special Forces soldiers ambushed in Niger were set up by terrorists, who were tipped off in advance about a meeting in a village sympathetic to local ISIS affiliates...The group of American Green Berets and support soldiers had requested a meeting with elders of a village that was seen as supportive of the Islamic State, and they attended the meeting at around 11 a.m. local time Oct. 4...Such meetings are a routine part of the Green Beret mission, but it wasn't clear whether this meeting was part of the unit's plan."
"The long-awaited sentencing of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was delayed Monday after a legal battle erupted over the word 'but' in President Donald Trump's most recent remarks about the case. Bergdahl's defense team argued that their client could not get a fair shake from the court because Trump, during a Rose Garden appearance on Oct. 16, at first said he couldn't talk about the case and then added: 'But I think people have heard my comments in the past.'" Trump has called him a traitor and suggested he should be executed.
"The Trump administration is coming under increased pressure from Congress to kill a landmark deal between Boeing and an Iranian airline known for engaging in terrorism over concerns the Western airline company would enable Tehran's transfer of militant fighters across the region, according to multiple sources, who told the Washington Free Beacon the administration is likely to nix the multi-billion dollar deal. The Obama administration's nuclear agreement with Iran paved the way for U.S. aerospace corporation Boeing to ink a deal with Iran's state-controlled airline, Iran Air, which was recently caught using its commercial planes to ferry Iranian militants to regional hotspots."
"Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, three sources with knowledge of the matter told NBC News. The probe of Podesta and his Democratic-leaning lobbying firm grew out of Mueller's inquiry into the finances of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort."