Democrats’ Net-Neutrality Resolution Poised for Senate Passage

With the continued absence of John McCain and defector Susan Collins holding firm, Senate GOP leaders are prepping for an impending loss in the net-neutrality fight.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Ed Markey
AP Photo/Susan Walsh
May 8, 2018, 8 p.m.

A Hail Mary pass thrown by Senate Democrats on net neutrality is about to find its way into the end zone.

On Wednesday, Sens. Chuck Schumer and Ed Markey will introduce a petition to force a vote on their resolution to undo last year’s rollback of the Federal Communications Commission’s net-neutrality rules, which prevented internet service providers from blocking, slowing down, or prioritizing web traffic.

The resolution is being pursued under the Congressional Review Act, which requires the support of just 30 senators to compel a vote and a simple majority to pass. And despite Republican control of the upper chamber, one GOP defection and another long-term absence is set to hand the Democrats a win on the hot-button tech issue.

A full 50 senators came out months ago in support of the resolution—including every member of the Democratic caucus and Sen. Susan Collins, the Maine Republican known for bucking her party. On Monday, Collins told reporters that, despite the best efforts of some of her GOP colleagues, she won’t be changing her mind.

But until recently, the fruitless search for another Republican to push the resolution over the edge had prevented some observers from realizing that Democrats are poised to win the vote regardless.

That’s due to the continued absence of Sen. John McCain, whose last vote was in December and who has remained in Arizona all year as he undergoes cancer treatment. Few expect the senator to return to the Capitol before June 12, when the timeline to vote on the resolution expires.

If McCain’s not there to vote and all other lawmakers hold firm, that should give Democrats the one-vote edge they need.

“We’re still looking for another Republican, but I’d say the odds are in our favor right now,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal said on Monday.

A spokeswoman for McCain did not respond when asked whether the senator could fly out to Washington to prevent a Democratic victory. But observers are skeptical that the ailing lawmaker will make the trip.

“I would be extremely surprised for McCain to return,” said Doug Brake, the director of broadband and spectrum policy at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.

Even if the resolution passes in the Senate, it would still have to pass in the House and be signed by President Trump before the FCC’s net-neutrality rules are reinstated.

“That’s a nigh impossible hill to climb,” said Brake, adding that it’d be unusual for McCain to put his health at risk in order to prevent a Democratic victory that’s unlikely to have an impact on policy anyway.

Republican leadership sees the writing on the wall, and they’re not happy.

“If it were to end up that the only Republican that we would lose would be Senator Collins, and Senator McCain not being there, it seems to me that the Democrats are going to have to answer the question about what that vote ultimately means,” Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune told reporters Tuesday.

While Thune refused to say it was inappropriate for Democrats to call a vote as McCain continues to convalesce, he strongly suggested their victory would be tainted by McCain’s absence.

“How that gets interpreted out there—given the fact that we were a vote down that otherwise would’ve been for it, it wouldn’t have passed except for that—then that’s going to be a discussion we’ll have at the time,” Thune said.

But the resolution could still pick up additional GOP defectors before the actual vote, which will likely take place before the end of the month. Progressive tech advocates and Democratic lawmakers have leaned for months on Sen. John Kennedy, who has yet to plant a foot in either camp.

Kennedy said he’s still undecided, and that he may not make a final decision until he’s forced to vote. “As soon as I figure it out, I’ll tell you,” he told National Journal on Monday.

Other possible defectors include Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada, who has remained tight-lipped about the net-neutrality resolution but is facing a tough reelection fight in November. Polls have consistently shown broad support for the FCC’s old net-neutrality rules, including with Republican voters.

Advocacy groups on both sides are stepping up their messaging to vulnerable Republican offices in advance of Wednesday’s petition. “I just never take these things for granted,” said Chris Lewis, the vice president of liberal tech group Public Knowledge, who said his organization and others like it continue to reach out to Senate offices and help citizens contact their lawmakers ahead of the vote.

Ken Cuccinelli, the director of conservative group FreedomWorks’ Regulatory Action Center, promised his organization would direct its 5 million members to email or call lawmakers in danger of flipping. “We are going to target especially Republican senators, but we want to go after all of them, really,” he said during a Tuesday press call.

Some conservatives are now arguing that the Congressional Review Act was never designed to reimpose regulations, and Thune suggested the resolution could face a legal challenge were it to pass. But the Republican lawmaker also said he’s confident that the measure won’t have an impact beyond the Senate.

“CRAs are used to prevent regulations from taking effect, to basically unwind overreaching regulations,” Thune said. “This would be the first time a CRA would be used to reregulate. It’s without precedent, and there’s no way House Republicans are ever going to vote for that.”

Democratic lawmakers dispute the notion that a successful Senate vote would be the high-water mark for their legislative efforts to restore the FCC’s net-neutrality rules.

“The CRA has been counted out before,” said Blumenthal. “If we can get it through here, it will have momentum going into the House—particularly as the individuals and groups interested in it become more mobilized.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.