The Emerging Democratic Divide Over Obamacare

President Obama is facing the reality that longtime allies are now looking out for their own survival, not taking one for the team.

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) listens during a Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works meeting discussing global warming on January 30, 2007.
National Journal
Josh Kraushaar
Nov. 13, 2013, 5:48 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are in the midst of a messy civil war between their es­tab­lish­ment wing and the tea-party in­sur­gents. But with Pres­id­ent Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ings col­lapsing amid prob­lems with his sig­na­ture health care law, Demo­crats are start­ing to face their own di­vi­sions.

Pres­id­ent Obama v. the Clin­tons. It’s hard to be­lieve Bill Clin­ton’s re­com­mend­a­tion that Obama hon­or his health care prom­ise was an ac­ci­dent. Not only did it provide cov­er for con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats to break with the White House, it also ad­ded to the pres­sure on an ad­min­is­tra­tion des­per­ately try­ing to come up with any last-ditch ad­min­is­trat­ive fix to stop the bleed­ing — without harm­ing the law it­self. Clin­ton knows how dam­aging the Obama­care prob­lems could be to Sen­ate Demo­crats and, if not re­solved soon, that they could have a last­ing im­pact on his wife’s (likely) pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. Hil­lary Clin­ton can’t tweak her old boss, but her hus­band cer­tainly can (and has be­fore).

Con­gres­sion­al di­vide between red-state Demo­crats and Obama loy­al­ists. We’re already see­ing red-state Demo­crats and sen­at­ors on the bal­lot in 2014 be­gin to break away from the White House. As polit­ic­ally pal­at­able le­gis­la­tion to al­ter Obama­care comes through with bi­par­tis­an sup­port, there will be a lot of pres­sure on oth­ers to join in (pa­ging re­li­ably lib­er­al Sens. Di­anne Fein­stein and Ben Cardin). The White House may res­ist, but a veto-proof ma­jor­ity may soon be build­ing to make sig­ni­fic­ant changes to the law, giv­en the cur­rent polit­ic­al sen­ti­ment. Des­pite dif­fi­cult re­la­tions with Con­gress, Obama usu­ally could count on party loy­alty to get him through rocky patches. Not any­more.

The party’s Hil­lary Clin­ton-Eliza­beth War­ren split. Clin­ton looks closer to a lock than any­one for the 2016 Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion this far out — as­sum­ing she runs. But the party’s pro­gress­ive wing is already star­ted to push Eliza­beth War­ren as a cred­ible can­did­ate. That’s un­likely. War­ren, des­pite the buzz, isn’t a smooth cam­paign­er. She would ap­peal mainly to a nar­row, af­flu­ent slice of the Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ate, and many of her Mas­sachu­setts Sen­ate donors would go with Clin­ton. But as 2016 draws closer, Demo­crats may start to worry about Obama’s bag­gage spread­ing to the party’s fu­ture nom­in­ee. Ex­pect to hear grow­ing pro­gress­ive angst to find any lib­er­al out­sider to chal­lenge the for­mid­able front-run­ner.

Amer­ic­an polit­ic­al his­tory shows that the pres­id­ent’s party tends to be united, while the op­pos­i­tion of­ten looks lead­er­less, rud­der­less, and di­vided. But when the pres­id­ent’s ap­prov­al rat­ing sinks in­to dan­ger­ous ter­rit­ory, that for­mula be­comes in­op­er­at­ive. And Obama is fa­cing the real­ity that many long­time al­lies are now look­ing out more for their polit­ic­al sur­viv­al than his leg­acy or the fate of his name­sake law.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×