Sen. John McCain switched gears suddenly Wednesday, withdrawing his support for Jeh Johnson’s confirmation for secretary of the Homeland Security Department over a flap about stalled immigration reform.
At a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing on Johnson’s confirmation, McCain, R-Ariz., started out reiterating positive comments he has made about Johnson, saying, “I’ve known you a number of years, and I’m very pleased you will be taking on these new responsibilities. I view you as an outstanding public servant. I’m confident that your confirmation process will be very smooth.”
But that happy talk disappeared abruptly when Johnson said he could not promise to give McCain information from DHS about what it would take to achieve 90 percent effective control of the U.S. border. The senator then did an abrupt about-face, saying Johnson’s demurral would cost his support for the DHS nomination.
“As we work “¦, the eight of us, to complete this comprehensive immigration [reform], which is stalled, as you know, in the House, … one major reason why it’s stalled is because [of] a lack of confidence in border security,” McCain said. “I want to know if you will give this committee the exact metrics that are needed sector-by-sector so that we can attain 90 percent effectiveness on the border.”
McCain said that Congress has responsibilities to secure the border, and unless DHS helps it figure out how, it cannot do its job.
“We have our responsibilities here”¦. So as much as I admire and appreciate you, unless you can tell me that, you will give the information that this committee has the right to have, I cannot support your nomination,” McCain said.
When Johnson said he wanted to be helpful but couldn’t make a promise, McCain called that response unacceptable.
“Let the record show you will not give a yes or no answer. Therefore I will not support your nomination until I get a yes answer,” he said.
Johnson attempted to show he was trying.
“Before I commit unequivocally to your question — and part of me very much wants to do that — I think I need to talk to people at DHS.”
In an interview with National Journal Daily after the hearing, McCain said he did not believe Johnson would provide the information because the White House would not allow it.
“The White House, we are told, … that when we were putting together comprehensive immigration reform that the White House told Homeland Security not to give us that information,” he said.
“I will not approve of his confirmation, because it is clearly information the Congress needs to make its decisions,” he added. “I’m not encouraging anybody. I act by myself on all of these things.”
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told NJ Daily that he was unsatisfied with Johnson’s answers about Americans’ privacy rights regarding domestic drones and said he was undecided on whether he would back Johnson’s confirmation.
Still, lawmakers and analysts monitoring Johnson’s confirmation overwhelmingly expect to see the administration’s former drone lawyer, who is credited with paving the way for the repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, confirmed.
“When you are confirmed — I’m not going to say if — because you are going to be confirmed,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the ranking member on the Homeland Security Committee, during the hearing.
“I personally want to thank you for stepping forward. I think it is the most difficult position of all of the Cabinet secretaries.”¦ It is clear to me that you are an honorable man, “¦ which is exactly what we want.”
What We're Following See More »
The Signal app is fast becoming the new favorite among those who are obsessed with the security and untraceabilty of their messaging. Just ask the Democratic National Committee. Or Edward Snowden. As Vanity Fair reports, before news ever broke that the DNC's servers had been hacked, word went out among the organization that the word "Trump" should never be used in their emails, lest it attract hackers' attention. Not long after, all Trump-related messages, especially disparaging ones, would need to be encrypted via the Snowden-approved Signal.
The Republican Study Committee may lose several members of the House Freedom Caucus next year, "potentially creating a split between two influential groups of House conservatives." The Freedom Caucus was founded at the inception of the current Congress by members who felt that the conservative RSC had gotten too cozy with leadership, "and its roughly 40 members have long clashed with the RSC over what tactics to use when pushing for conservative legislation." As many as 20 members may not join the RSC for the new Congress next year.
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday issued emergency authorization for a Zika diagnostics test from Swiss drugmaker Roche, skirting normal approval channels as the regulator moves to fight the disease's spread." Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that a new study in Nature identifies "about a dozen substances" that could "suppress the pathogen's replication." Some of them are already in clinical trials.
According to 37 newly released audits, "some private Medicare plans overcharged the government for the majority of elderly patients they treated." A number of Medicare Advantage plans overstated "the severity of medical conditions like diabetes and depression." The money has since been paid back, though some plans are appealing the federal audits.
"GOP leaders and House Democrats are already laying the groundwork for a short-term continuing resolution" on the budget this fall "that will set up a vote on a catch-all spending bill right before the holidays." As usual, however, the House Freedom Caucus may throw a wrench in Speaker Paul Ryan's gears. The conservative bloc doesn't appear willing to accept any CR that doesn't fund the government into 2017.