The Environmental Promise Obama Completely Abandoned

Five years ago, the administration vowed to regulate coal ash, a toxic power-plant byproduct. Green groups are still waiting.

An aerial image of the Kingston ash spill from Dec. 23, 2008. 
National Journal
Patrick Reis
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Nov. 17, 2013, 4 p.m.

Be­fore Pres­id­ent Obama had even taken the oath of of­fice, his ad­min­is­tra­tion was prom­ising to pro­tect the pub­lic from tox­ic coal waste pro­duced by power plants. But well in­to the pres­id­ent’s second term — and nearly five years after Amer­ic­ans learned of the dangers of coal ash after a massive spill dev­ast­ated a Ten­ness­ee town — that pledge is a green dream that is at least de­ferred, and quite pos­sibly dead.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has all but hal­ted its re­view of the ex­ist­ing policies for stor­ing coal ash, and al­though en­vir­on­ment­al­ists are eagerly await­ing a fi­nal an­swer on the is­sue, they’re not op­tim­ist­ic. While they’re loathe to ad­mit it pub­licly, en­vir­on­ment­al ad­voc­ates will privately con­cede they no longer ex­pect the ad­min­is­tra­tion to is­sue the tough rules they’ve long sought.

En­vir­on­ment­al groups — in­clud­ing the Si­erra Club, Earthjustice, and Ap­palachi­an Voices — were handed a minor vic­tory two weeks ago when a fed­er­al judge gave the ad­min­is­tra­tion two months to set a dead­line to fin­ish its re­view of coal-ash stor­age rules. But the vic­tory is bit­ter­sweet at best, be­cause even se­cur­ing that dead­line re­quired the en­vir­on­ment­al groups to sue an ad­min­is­tra­tion that once seemed all but cer­tain to side with them.

Mo­mentum built for new rules in Decem­ber 2008, when the con­tain­ment wall of a coal-ash pond at a Ten­ness­ee Val­ley Au­thor­ity power plant gave way, send­ing more than 1 bil­lion gal­lons of the ar­sen­ic- and lead-laden waste in­to the town of King­ston. The spill flooded homes and dumped linger­ing tox­ins in­to the loc­al wa­ter sup­ply.

At her con­firm­a­tion hear­ing weeks later, Lisa Jack­son, the in­com­ing ad­min­is­trat­or of the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency, prom­ised to re­view the ex­ist­ing rules for stor­ing coal waste, and by Oc­to­ber of that year agency sci­ent­ists had pre­pared a plan to rad­ic­ally change them. EPA was ready to pro­pose re­clas­si­fy­ing coal ash as a haz­ard­ous waste and to is­sue the first set of bind­ing fed­er­al stand­ards for its stor­age and dis­pos­al.

Be­fore EPA could pub­li­cize its pre­ferred ap­proach, however, of­fi­cials had to route it through the White House Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget, which con­ducts in­ter­agency re­views of reg­u­la­tions that are deemed to be eco­nom­ic­ally sig­ni­fic­ant. And that’s where everything changed. The rules lingered at the White House for nearly sev­en months, and when they emerged, the un­am­bigu­ous push for stricter stand­ards had been re­moved.

The draft that EPA sent to the White House also men­tioned a second op­tion for reg­u­lat­ing the waste, which would as­sign the ash non­haz­ard­ous status and leave en­force­ment to the states — an ar­range­ment that has been in place for dec­ades. But the agency didn’t en­dorse that ap­proach, say­ing it “would not be pro­tect­ive of hu­man [health] and the en­vir­on­ment.” Dur­ing the White House re­view, however, the haz­ard­ous and non­haz­ard­ous op­tions were placed on equal foot­ing.

The coal-min­ing and util­ity in­dus­tries ap­plauded the el­ev­a­tion of the non­haz­ard­ous op­tion in 2010, say­ing it was enough to en­sure pub­lic safety and that the stricter al­tern­at­ive would place an un­ne­ces­sary bur­den on coal-fired power plants.

EPA re­leased that “mul­tiple choice” pro­pos­al in May 2010. Since then, little has happened. More than three years later, the agency has not re­leased a fi­nal rule, and the only sign of life on the is­sue was EPA’s Oc­to­ber 2011 re­quest to the pub­lic for more in­form­a­tion.

Why did the ad­min­is­tra­tion re­verse course on coal ash? The White House re­ferred ques­tions about the 2009 change to OMB’s press of­fice, which did not reply. For its part, EPA in­sists that it’s simply do­ing due di­li­gence. The agency is eval­u­at­ing new data and look­ing through the nearly half-mil­lion com­ments it has re­ceived on the pro­posed rule, said EPA spokes­wo­man Al­isha John­son. She de­clined to com­ment on when the agency might com­ply with the fed­er­al court’s or­der to pub­lish a sched­ule for fin­ish­ing the rule.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s en­vir­on­ment­al crit­ics, however, say the troubles are not tech­nic­al or sci­entif­ic but polit­ic­al. The push for coal-ash rules has few con­gres­sion­al cham­pi­ons and no short­age of crit­ics. The House in June voted to block EPA from de­clar­ing the waste haz­ard­ous, with 39 Demo­crats join­ing a Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity. Also vot­ing in fa­vor was Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, whose Ten­ness­ee dis­trict in­cludes the site of TVA’s King­ston spill. The bill is likely dead in the Sen­ate.

That op­pos­i­tion led the White House to blunt EPA’s reg­u­lat­ory push in 2009, and the same forces with­in the ad­min­is­tra­tion are delay­ing it now, said Rena Stein­zor, a Uni­versity of Mary­land law-school pro­fess­or and the pres­id­ent of the Cen­ter for Pro­gress­ive Re­form. “I con­tin­ue to be­lieve it is a mat­ter of polit­ic­al con­veni­ence and weak­ness,” she said. “I’m just wait­ing to hear about the next spill. It’s a dis­aster wait­ing to hap­pen.”

But tired though they are of wait­ing, pa­tience may be en­vir­on­ment­al­ists’ best hope for the coal-ash rules they say are vi­tal. The White House now has a dif­fer­ent re­la­tion­ship with the coal in­dustry, as well as with coal-state law­makers, than it did in 2009. Then, the ad­min­is­tra­tion was still woo­ing both groups in a bid to get sup­port for cap-and-trade le­gis­la­tion to cut car­bon emis­sions. Now the cli­mate bill is dead, and so is the charm cam­paign.

Con­gres­sion­al op­pos­i­tion, in­clud­ing from mod­er­ate Demo­crats, did noth­ing to de­ter EPA from in­tro­du­cing green­house-gas reg­u­la­tions for power plants. And a bi­par­tis­an re­volt has made no pro­gress in lift­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s tight new rules for moun­tain­top min­ing. If this ad­min­is­tra­tion wants to de­clare coal ash a health haz­ard, noth­ing is really stand­ing in the way. Ex­cept, of course, it­self.

What We're Following See More »
REPEATS CONTROVERSIAL CLAIM
Trump: Clinton “Doesn’t Have The Stamina” to be President
2 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

At the end of the debate, moderator Lester Holt asked Donald Trump if he stands by his statement that Hillary Clinton didn't have the look of a president. Trump responded by saying Holt misquoted him, instead saying that Clinton "doesn't have the stamina." Clinton responded by saying that when Trump visits 112 countries as secretary of state, he can talk to her about stamina.

WIDELY DEBUNKED CLAIM
Trump: Clinton Camp Started Birtherism
3 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

Donald Trump, when pressed by Lester Holt on why he finally admitted that President Obama was born in America, repeated his widely debunked claim that it was started by Hillary Clinton.

“AFRICAN AMERICANS” ARE “LIVING IN HELL”
Conversation Shifts to Race
3 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

Hillary Clinton went point by point on how race can so often determine the treatment that people receive, mentioning recent shootings in Tulsa and Charlotte, calling for restored trust between communities and police, and demanding criminal justice reform. Trump responded by calling for law and order and touting his endorsements from police unions. He then said that “African Americans are living in hell,” saying they are just walking down the street and getting “shot ... being decimated by crime."

JUST AS CLINTON INVITES VIEWERS TO VISIT HER SITE
During Debate, Trump Site Appears to Be Down
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Just as Hillary Clinton was inviting debate viewers to visit her site for real-time fact checking, there appeared to be a problem with Donald Trump's own campaign website. For about a 15-minute period, a blank page or an error message appeared when we tried to load the Trump site.

INTERRUPTS CLINTON MULTIPLE TIMES
Trump Comes Out Swinging
4 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

Donald Trump has come out in the first segment of this debate raring to go. Trump has interrupted nearly every answer being given by Hillary Clinton, talking over her time and again. Clinton is sticking to her guns, smiling while Trump speaks and then calling on people to go to her website and see the fact checking being done.

×