Senate Poised to Debate Defense Policy Bill

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Nov. 14, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

The Sen­ate on Thursday began the pro­cess of con­sid­er­ing le­gis­la­tion that cov­ers nuc­le­ar-weapons spend­ing and may be amended to in­clude in­creased sanc­tions against Ir­an.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id (D-Nev.) filed a so-called clo­ture mo­tion that will com­pel the start of de­bate on the fisc­al 2014 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill in the com­ing days, The Hill news­pa­per re­por­ted. Re­id said he wants the cham­ber to wrap up its multi-day de­bate on the Pentagon policy le­gis­la­tion be­fore Thanks­giv­ing.

Sen­at­ors are ex­pec­ted to of­fer hun­dreds of pro­posed amend­ments, in­clud­ing at least one that would ex­pand eco­nom­ic sanc­tions against Ir­an, in an at­tempt to force the Per­sian Gulf coun­try to reach a deal with the United States and five oth­er na­tions to curb its nuc­le­ar-de­vel­op­ment work. Sen­at­or Lind­sey Gra­ham (R-S.C.) has vowed to of­fer such an amend­ment.

The de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill also cov­ers Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion fund­ing.

The Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee ap­proved its de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion le­gis­la­tion in June, the same month that the Re­pub­lic­an-led House passed its con­trast­ing ver­sion of the bill.

The Sen­ate pan­el wants to au­thor­ize $526.6 bil­lion in spend­ing for the De­fense De­part­ment’s base budget, or $9 mil­lion less than re­ques­ted by Pres­id­ent Obama. The le­gis­la­tion pro­poses $17.8 bil­lion in fund­ing for na­tion­al-se­cur­ity pro­grams in the En­ergy De­part­ment, which is $16 mil­lion less than the ad­min­is­tra­tion pro­posed for them.

The au­thor­iz­a­tion bill sets over­all spend­ing amounts, but the sep­ar­ate de­fense ap­pro­pri­ations bill more dir­ectly dic­tates the na­tion­al-se­cur­ity fund­ing.

Fisc­al 2014 star­ted on Oct. 1.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login