Hagel ‘Felt Sorry’ for Kerry After Iran Negotiations Faltered

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, citing the recent Pay Our Military Act, will recall to work hundreds of thousands of furloughed civilian employees of the Department of Defense next week.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Nov. 14, 2013, 11:18 a.m.

De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel said he “felt sorry” for Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry as mem­bers of Con­gress and pun­dits skewered the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion for fail­ing to reach an agree­ment on Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram in Geneva last week.

Speak­ing at the De­fense One sum­mit in Wash­ing­ton, Hagel de­fen­ded the on­go­ing dip­lo­mat­ic out­reach aimed at even­tu­ally curb­ing Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram.

“If we can move to­ward some com­mon in­terest, move to some high­er ground, to some pos­sible po­ten­tial res­ol­u­tion to a prob­lem, aren’t we smarter to do that? En­gage­ment is not sur­render. It is not ap­pease­ment,” Hagel said.

“I felt sorry for Sec­ret­ary Kerry, be­cause people jumped in­to this, say­ing ‘Well, he didn’t get any­thing; he didn’t get a deal.’ Wait a minute. We’ve been at some kind of un­of­fi­cial war with Ir­an since 1979. Does any­body really think we’re all go­ing to get to­geth­er in some kind of P5+1 [ne­go­ti­ations] for a week and come out of that with some tiny little agree­ment?”

All the world powers at stake — and Ir­an, too — have polit­ic­al is­sues to con­tend with in the ne­go­ti­ations, Hagel con­tin­ued. “It’s go­ing to take time,” he said.

Mean­while, on Cap­it­ol Hill, mem­bers of Con­gress from both parties are talk­ing tough about keep­ing the ex­ist­ing raft of sanc­tions against Ir­an in place, and pos­sibly even levy­ing more meas­ures against the Is­lam­ic Re­pub­lic des­pite the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pleas for them to hold off.

Hagel cau­tioned against abandon­ing dip­lomacy and risk­ing an­oth­er war, es­pe­cially as the U.S. draws down its forces after more than a dec­ade of con­flict in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan.

Still, Hagel stressed the need for keep­ing the U.S. mil­it­ary at the ready for any pos­sib­il­ity. The threat of mil­it­ary force re­cently proved ef­fect­ive in con­vin­cing Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad to agree to a deal to des­troy chem­ic­al weapons in his coun­try.

“I don’t think we would have had any kind of open­ing to get to where we are with chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia “¦ without the real, live threat of mil­it­ary force,” Hagel said. “Wheth­er it’s Ir­an or Syr­ia, it’s how do you smartly use your mil­it­ary to in­flu­ence out­comes.”

What We're Following See More »
VERY FEW DEMS NOW REPRESENT MINING COMMUNITIES
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
46 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE
STAFF PICKS
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Source:
‘STARTING FROM ZERO’
Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Source:
27TH AMENDMENT
Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
7 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."

×