Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said he “felt sorry” for Secretary of State John Kerry as members of Congress and pundits skewered the Obama administration for failing to reach an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program in Geneva last week.
Speaking at the Defense One summit in Washington, Hagel defended the ongoing diplomatic outreach aimed at eventually curbing Iran’s nuclear program.
“If we can move toward some common interest, move to some higher ground, to some possible potential resolution to a problem, aren’t we smarter to do that? Engagement is not surrender. It is not appeasement,” Hagel said.
“I felt sorry for Secretary Kerry, because people jumped into this, saying ‘Well, he didn’t get anything; he didn’t get a deal.’ Wait a minute. We’ve been at some kind of unofficial war with Iran since 1979. Does anybody really think we’re all going to get together in some kind of P5+1 [negotiations] for a week and come out of that with some tiny little agreement?”
All the world powers at stake — and Iran, too — have political issues to contend with in the negotiations, Hagel continued. “It’s going to take time,” he said.
Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, members of Congress from both parties are talking tough about keeping the existing raft of sanctions against Iran in place, and possibly even levying more measures against the Islamic Republic despite the administration’s pleas for them to hold off.
Hagel cautioned against abandoning diplomacy and risking another war, especially as the U.S. draws down its forces after more than a decade of conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Still, Hagel stressed the need for keeping the U.S. military at the ready for any possibility. The threat of military force recently proved effective in convincing President Bashar al-Assad to agree to a deal to destroy chemical weapons in his country.
“I don’t think we would have had any kind of opening to get to where we are with chemical weapons in Syria “¦ without the real, live threat of military force,” Hagel said. “Whether it’s Iran or Syria, it’s how do you smartly use your military to influence outcomes.”
What We're Following See More »
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.
UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”