Reducing the World’s Most Powerful Woman to a Dress

Thursday’s <em>Roll Call</em> story chiding the nominee for the Federal Reserve for not switching up her wardrobe is only the beginning.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Nov. 15, 2013, 5:32 a.m.

A story on Roll Call Thursday night cast as­per­sions on Janet Yel­len, Pres­id­ent Obama’s pick to head the Fed­er­al Re­serve, for, of all things, hav­ing an in­suf­fi­ciently var­ied ward­robe. The con­sensus on Twit­ter was that such an art­icle would nev­er have been writ­ten about a man.

Ac­tu­ally it’s worse than that.

Those stor­ies have been writ­ten about men, and they’re un­fail­ingly praised for be­ing de­cis­ive lead­ers who don’t waste brain power on frivol­ous things like fash­ion. Take, for ex­ample, Obama, or Mark Zuck­er­berg, or Steve Jobs.

Obama fam­ously told Van­ity Fair that he wears only blue or gray suits. “You need to fo­cus your de­cision-mak­ing en­ergy,” he told Mi­chael Lewis. “You need to rou­tin­ize your­self.” The head­lines praised him for de­clut­ter­ing his mind and cut­ting down on “non­vital” choices. ” Barack Obama’s Secret Weapon? Routine,” read a head­line in The Guard­i­an.

Zuck­er­berg, who wore the same Face­book T-shirt al­most every day for years was lauded for sav­ing time in the morn­ing. “He’s ex­tremely busy, and pick­ing clothes takes time out of his day that could be spent do­ing oth­er things,” notes a post in The Wall Street Journ­al.

Mean­while, Steve Jobs’s de­cision to wear a black tur­tle­neck and jeans every day had him be­ing praised as a “fash­ion vis­ion­ary.” Jobs’s uni­form, ob­served one writer, “has here­to­fore seemed less like a soph­ist­ic­ated sar­tori­al choice than a savvy ex­cer­cise in per­son­al brand­ing, a sym­bol of as­cet­ic de­vo­tion to tech­no­logy.” Ac­claimed de­sign­er Ral­ph Ruc­cin­has has called it one of the most “wholly ori­gin­al” ideas in mod­ern fash­ion.

And when Ben Bernanke, Yel­len’s pre­de­cessor at the Fed, told Time in 2009 that he favored re­l­at­ively in­ex­pens­ive threads at Jos A. Bank over de­sign­er suits, he was hailed for his prag­mat­ism.

There are hun­dreds of power­ful men on Cap­it­ol Hill, and every day they wake up and put on a suit and tie. They all look the same. Day after day after day.

If you are a wo­man, the closest you can come to wear­ing a suit and tie is to wear a black dress with a fit­ted black jack­et. That is ex­actly what Yel­len was wear­ing.

Pay too much at­ten­tion to what you wear, and you be­come “a White House coun­sel known for her shoes.” Not enough, and you’re the new Fed pick who needs some new threads. Wear something wo­manly, and you’re sexu­al­ized. Wear a pant­suit, and you’re try­ing to be a man. Wear a con­ser­vat­ive black dress, and you’re fine. Un­til you wear it a second time, then you’re a head­line or a punch­line.

I’m not pick­ing on Roll Call‘s War­ren Ro­jas. I’m pick­ing on the rules of the game, rules that al­lowed the wo­man about to con­trol the world’s largest eco­nomy to be re­duced to a dress.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4570) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×