Analysis

Why Trump Won’t Say “You’re Fired”

The president has used tweets, media leaks, and middlemen—not face-to-face meetings—to let aides know they’re out of a job.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson steps away from the podium at the State Department after he was fired by President Trump on Tuesday.
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
March 13, 2018, 8 p.m.

President Trump’s dismissal of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Tuesday was an abrupt, messy, and dramatic show of perhaps the most surprising thing Americans have learned about their president—the showman whose trademark phrase was “You’re fired” really isn’t very good at firing people.

His firing of Tillerson was as clumsy as any dismissal of a high-level official in modern American history. No one near Tillerson’s rank has been so publicly surprised since President Truman was forced by a news leak in 1951 to confirm his firing of Gen. Douglas MacArthur before the general was officially informed.

Tillerson had been warned by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly on Friday that something may be imminent. But after almost 14 months of public taunts from the president and rampant speculation about his job security, Tillerson reportedly did not think the axe would fall on this day. At 8:44 a.m. EDT, the world learned otherwise. It was then that the president tweeted his new choice for the top diplomatic post, adding almost as an afterthought, “Thank you to Rex Tillerson for his service!”

Because the White House did not cover the firing with the traditional fig leaf of accepting a “resignation” letter and effusively praising the official they forced to walk the gangplank, Tillerson’s allies at the State Department responded in kind. Steve Goldstein, the undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs, put out a blunt statement that infuriated the White House. “The secretary had every intention of staying,” the statement said, adding pointedly, “The secretary did not speak to the president this morning and is unaware of the reason.” Goldstein was immediately fired by the White House for his truth-telling.

For Washington, this is highly unusual behavior. For Trump, it has become expected.

When he fired FBI Director James Comey last May, he dispatched his personal aide Keith Schiller to bring the news to Comey’s office. Then he leaked the firing so that Comey, who was in California, would learn he was fired from cable news. When the president fired his first chief of staff, Reince Priebus, he did it by tweet, letting the world see a humiliated Priebus leave Air Force One in the rain and go to a waiting car to whisk him away from his former duties.

“I think Donald Trump doesn’t like to fire people, period,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told Fox News the week Priebus was dumped. In an interview with Life Beyond Sport before the campaign, Trump admitted this. “People think I enjoy firing people. I don’t,” he said of the firings on his show The Apprentice.

In her book All Alone on the 68th Floor, Barbara Res, who worked with Trump for 18 years and was the top construction engineer on Trump Tower, contrasted the TV Trump with the man she saw in a real business. “Maybe Donald can unceremoniously say, ‘You’re fired’ to actors on a TV show, but in real life, he hated to do it,” she wrote. “When someone had to be fired, Donald laid the job off on an underling.”

In Washington, a city that still celebrates Truman’s “the buck stops here” slogan, that is something new at the White House. When President George H.W. Bush in 1991 wanted to push Chief of Staff John Sununu out, he sent the message first through his son, George W. Bush. Sununu dismissed the warning, and then the president had several face-to-face conversations with Sununu, allowing him to resign and calling that resignation “a class act.” Similarly, in 1987, when President Reagan wanted to oust Chief of Staff Donald Regan, he used family—first lady Nancy Reagan—to give a nudge. But Reagan used a personal meeting with Regan to set the actual departure, hoping to make it look less embarrassing to Regan. Reagan also tried to spare the feelings of Secretary of State Alexander Haig when he pushed him out in 1982.

Trump has shown no such concern for the feelings of any of the officials he has fired from his campaign or his administration, with the exception of his first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, whom he lavishly praised even while dismissing him.

“This is Trump,” said Bruce Jentleson, a veteran of the State Department when Presidents Clinton and Obama were in office and currently professor of political science at Duke University. “There is a real abruptness and in-your-faceness to the way Trump does it. We all find out at the same time as the person being fired.”

He said this allows the president to avoid facing his victims. “As tough as he likes to sound, he is unwilling to look somebody in the eyes and say, ‘I’m firing you.’ It may be because he worries about what they may say in return—like they might ask the question, ‘Why?’”

Jentleson calls it a major “temperament issue” for the president. “A bully does it like this, and thin skin is why he will not do it face to face,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
6 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
6 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login