Farmers are besieged by low commodity prices and the specter of a North American Free Trade Agreement overhaul. And now they’re digging in for a rapidly escalating—and largely unexpected—fight over ethanol that could deliver seismic shifts to the farm economy.
President Trump is set to host another summit at the White House on Thursday with ethanol producers and oil-refiner representatives, just two days after key Senate lawmakers sat down with Trump and his top agriculture and environment lieutenants.
The Trump administration is mulling new policy to pare down compliance costs for the Environmental Protection Agency’s ethanol mandate, Sen. Ted Cruz, who has spearheaded the political opposition to the mandate, told reporters following the Tuesday meeting.
“The president leaned in hard,” Cruz said. “The objective has been and remains to find a solution that stops skyrocketing [compliance credits], which are made-up regulatory licenses from bankrupting refineries across the country and costing the jobs of tens of thousands of refinery workers.”
But ethanol groups are aggressively repelling the Cruz proposals, which they say would upend the market for ethanol and more technologically advanced biofuel. That could send the farm economy, which is driven in large part by corn, into further distress.
Some lawmakers are warning against an overhaul to the mandate, known formally as the Renewable Fuel Standard.
“Say you dramatically turned off the production of ethanol. You put a huge amount of grain back into the rest of the market and what would that do to supply and demand of corn prices and other prices? It would be huge downward pressure,” Rep. Frank Lucas, who sponsored the last farm bill in 2014, told National Journal. “Not everybody raises corn, but corn is the feed grain in this country that sets the price trend for wheat and barley and oats and everything else.”
Grain-farm representatives are echoing that concern.
“If you gut the RFS you are going to cause havoc in the rural economy. You’re going to see a drop in the corn price. You’re going to see a drop in the soybean prices. You’re going to see a drop in wheat prices, land prices,” National Association of Wheat Growers CEO Chandler Goule said.
A half-dozen farm associations, including Goule’s group and the American Farm Bureau Federation, pressured Trump in a letter earlier this week to maintain support for the RFS. The Midwest turned out in impressive fashion for Trump in the 2016 election. Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin helped deliver the Republican candidate to the White House.
Corn producers currently fetch about $3.75 a bushel, a figure dwarfed by the historic high of more than $8.00 in 2012. But as recently as the year 2005, the price had dropped well below $2.
The feed market is competitive, and therefore a rise in corn prices—fueled by increased demand—would also increase other commodity values.
Nearly 40 percent of the corn produced in the U.S. annually is processed into ethanol, according to the Agriculture Department. The EPA mandate forces industry to blend 15 billion gallons of ethanol into the nation’s gasoline supply annually. Most gasoline in the U.S. contains 10 percent ethanol.
Many oil refiners, such as now-bankrupt Philadelphia Energy Solutions, don’t blend ethanol, choosing instead to purchase blending credits to comply with the program. The Philadelphia refiner’s nosedive emboldened RFS critics.
Cruz, who held a town hall at the refiner last week to drum up opposition to the mandate, is calling on the EPA to sell waivers for compliance credits at 10 cents, which would effectively implement a cap to the price of those credits, known as renewable identification numbers.
Ethanol groups and their Capitol Hill allies say that would slash demand for ethanol and upend the program.
“It’s clear this is going to be a very tough road ahead,” Sen. Joni Ernst told reporters after the Tuesday meeting on a call with Sen. Chuck Grassley. “We’re going to be fighting this out.” Both senators attended the meeting, alongside Cruz and Sen. Pat Toomey.
But others farm groups, such as pork, beef, and poultry producers, have complained in the past that the RFS raises feed prices and jeopardizes their bottom line. Many industry experts say the RFS helped to boost commodity prices to record levels between 2006 and 2012, the years which followed the enactment of energy statute that put the RFS in place.
Some critics of the RFS admit that dismantling the program would decrease a range of commodity prices and land prices in the Midwest but argue that those drops would restore traditional values.
“If you actually sort of deconstruct and look at farm incomes and farm prices over the last 15 to 20 years, we’re at or above where you expect to be for many commodities and in terms of overall cash income to the farming sector,” Vince Smith, a Montana State University professor and a visiting American Enterprise Institute scholar, told National Journal. “Are we talking about having people become destitute in Iowa? Well, probably not. Those stories are vastly exaggerated.”
Roughly 15 percent of U.S. corn production is shipped abroad, and increased exports could help to cushion the shockwaves linked to decreased ethanol demand, Smith said. That demand, meanwhile, would still likely persist in the absence of the RFS, based at least partially on demand for higher octane fuels, which ethanol blending helps to reach.
Cruz is proposing to also allow gasoline with higher ethanol blends, such as 15 percent, to be sold year-round—a favorite reform measure of ethanol supporters. Currently the EPA bans summer sales of those blends in a large part of the country, citing environmental concerns.
Still, ethanol allies on Capitol Hill are readily rejecting the Cruz proposal.
“Senator Cruz is going to continue to face stiff resistance,” Sen. Deb Fischer, one of the staunchest ethanol supporters on Capitol Hill, told National Journal.
What We're Following See More »
"The House on Friday overwhelmingly passed sweeping bipartisan opioid legislation, concluding the chamber’s two-week voteathon on dozens of bills to address the drug abuse epidemic. The measure combines more than 50 bills approved individually by the House focusing on expanding access to treatment, encouraging the development of alternative pain treatments and curbing the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. It was passed 396-14, with 13 Republicans and one Democrat voting against the package."
In a letter to Congress on Friday, President Trump wrote that he's continuing the national emergency status with respect to North Korea, citing the country's “provocative, destabilizing, and repressive actions," which "continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States. In a series of tweets following his meeting with Kim Jong-un, Trump said Americans could sleep well at night because North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat.
"The U.S. Navy is preparing plans to construct sprawling detention centers for tens of thousands of immigrants on remote bases in California, Alabama and Arizona, escalating the military’s task in implementing President Donald Trump’s 'zero tolerance' policy for people caught crossing the Southern border." The document outlines plans for "temporary and austere" internment camps for 25,000 migrants "at abandoned airfields just outside the Florida panhandle," and in Alabama, for 47,000 people near San Francisco, and "as many as 47,000 people at Camp Pendleton" in California. The document estimates that operating a camp to detain 25,000 people for six months would cost approximately $233 million.
"The United States is preparing to shelter as many as 20,000 migrant children on four American military bases" in Texas and Arkansas, "as federal officials struggled to carry out President Trump’s order to keep immigrant families together after they are apprehended at the border."
"House Republican leaders are further delaying a vote on a compromise immigration bill, planning to make changes to the legislation for a vote next week. The news comes after a two-hour Republican Conference meeting Thursday, in which authors of the bill walked through its contents and members raised concerns about issues the bill doesn’t address, multiple GOP lawmakers said. Many members requested the addition of a provision to require employers to use the E-Verify database to cheek the legal status of their employees."