The U.S. Air Force will keep costs and military requirements for its future bomber aircraft tightly constrained, service Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said this week.
“Cost is going to be a no-kidding independent variable in this,” Welsh told reporters at a Wednesday breakfast session, according to Jane’s Defense Weekly.
The flying service intends to buy 80 to 100 of the nuclear- and conventional-capable aircraft beginning in the 2020s, with each bomber costing roughly $550 million. Welsh said that unit price should be enough to make the bomber a “capable machine,” Jane’s reported.
To develop the new stealthy aircraft, the Air Force is spending $440 million this year, and intends to ramp up to $1 billion for its R&D investment next year, the Air Force News Service reported.
Welsh said that to control costs, his service must avoid the temptation during the ongoing developmental phase to gold-plate the new bomber with like-to-have but unnecessary capabilities, a phenomenon sometimes called “requirements drift.”
“We are not going to go there,” he said at the Defense Writers Group forum, saying the bomber would use only proven technologies, the military news service reported.
Welsh also noted that the Air Force would cut back on the number of lethal drones it fields for counterterrorism operations, according to a Wednesday report in the Washington Post.
With a growing focus on boosting the U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific region, the Air Force will reduce drone activities from the current average of 62 combat operations per day worldwide to something more on the order of 45, Welsh said.
The service uses the drones in counterterrorism efforts in Afghanistan — where U.S. combat operations will mostly draw to a close in 2014 — and in Yemen, Somalia, West Africa and along the Turkish-Iraqi border, according to the Post report.
- 1 High Court Vacancy Spells Trouble for Congress
- 2 The Winners and Losers From the South Carolina Republican Debate
- 3 Why Four Justices Were Against the Supreme Court’s Huge Gay-Marriage Decision
- 4 How Do Presidential Candidates Spend $1 Billion?
- 5 Ted Cruz Announces Presidential Agenda Disguised as Plan for GOP Congress
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.