The U.S. Air Force will keep costs and military requirements for its future bomber aircraft tightly constrained, service Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said this week.
“Cost is going to be a no-kidding independent variable in this,” Welsh told reporters at a Wednesday breakfast session, according to Jane’s Defense Weekly.
The flying service intends to buy 80 to 100 of the nuclear- and conventional-capable aircraft beginning in the 2020s, with each bomber costing roughly $550 million. Welsh said that unit price should be enough to make the bomber a “capable machine,” Jane’s reported.
To develop the new stealthy aircraft, the Air Force is spending $440 million this year, and intends to ramp up to $1 billion for its R&D investment next year, the Air Force News Service reported.
Welsh said that to control costs, his service must avoid the temptation during the ongoing developmental phase to gold-plate the new bomber with like-to-have but unnecessary capabilities, a phenomenon sometimes called “requirements drift.”
“We are not going to go there,” he said at the Defense Writers Group forum, saying the bomber would use only proven technologies, the military news service reported.
Welsh also noted that the Air Force would cut back on the number of lethal drones it fields for counterterrorism operations, according to a Wednesday report in the Washington Post.
With a growing focus on boosting the U.S. military presence in the Asia-Pacific region, the Air Force will reduce drone activities from the current average of 62 combat operations per day worldwide to something more on the order of 45, Welsh said.
The service uses the drones in counterterrorism efforts in Afghanistan — where U.S. combat operations will mostly draw to a close in 2014 — and in Yemen, Somalia, West Africa and along the Turkish-Iraqi border, according to the Post report.
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.