Air Force Chief: Bomber Cost to Be Tightly Capped

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Nov. 15, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

The U.S. Air Force will keep costs and mil­it­ary re­quire­ments for its fu­ture bomber air­craft tightly con­strained, ser­vice Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said this week.

“Cost is go­ing to be a no-kid­ding in­de­pend­ent vari­able in this,” Welsh told re­port­ers at a Wed­nes­day break­fast ses­sion, ac­cord­ing to Jane’s De­fense Weekly.

The fly­ing ser­vice in­tends to buy 80 to 100 of the nuc­le­ar- and con­ven­tion­al-cap­able air­craft be­gin­ning in the 2020s, with each bomber cost­ing roughly $550 mil­lion. Welsh said that unit price should be enough to make the bomber a “cap­able ma­chine,” Jane’s re­por­ted.

To de­vel­op the new stealthy air­craft, the Air Force is spend­ing $440 mil­lion this year, and in­tends to ramp up to $1 bil­lion for its R&D in­vest­ment next year, the Air Force News Ser­vice re­por­ted.

Welsh said that to con­trol costs, his ser­vice must avoid the tempta­tion dur­ing the on­go­ing de­vel­op­ment­al phase to gold-plate the new bomber with like-to-have but un­ne­ces­sary cap­ab­il­it­ies, a phe­nomen­on some­times called “re­quire­ments drift.”

“We are not go­ing to go there,” he said at the De­fense Writers Group for­um, say­ing the bomber would use only proven tech­no­lo­gies, the mil­it­ary news ser­vice re­por­ted.

Welsh also noted that the Air Force would cut back on the num­ber of leth­al drones it fields for coun­terter­ror­ism op­er­a­tions, ac­cord­ing to a Wed­nes­day re­port in the Wash­ing­ton Post.

With a grow­ing fo­cus on boost­ing the U.S. mil­it­ary pres­ence in the Asia-Pa­cific re­gion, the Air Force will re­duce drone activ­it­ies from the cur­rent av­er­age of 62 com­bat op­er­a­tions per day world­wide to something more on the or­der of 45, Welsh said.

The ser­vice uses the drones in coun­terter­ror­ism ef­forts in Afgh­anistan — where U.S. com­bat op­er­a­tions will mostly draw to a close in 2014 — and in Ye­men, Somalia, West Africa and along the Turk­ish-Ir­aqi bor­der, ac­cord­ing to the Post re­port.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×