Two Years With the Tea Party

What happens when two Brooklyn filmmakers spend 30 months documenting the lives of tea-party activists? The answer may surprise you.

A still from the new documentary "Town Hall."
National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
Nov. 18, 2013, 9:31 a.m.

When Si­erra Petten­gill and Jam­ila Wignot set out to doc­u­ment the tea party phe­nomen­on in early 2010, they had no idea wheth­er the move­ment would last an­oth­er two months, let alone two years. It did, of course, and they were there to cap­ture it on film as the ragtag grass­roots act­iv­ists got or­gan­ized and evolved through the ec­stasy of the 2010 midterm to the agony of de­feat two years later.

Their new doc­u­ment­ary, “Town Hall,” screen­ing Wed­nes­day at the DOC NYC film fest­iv­al in New York City, fol­lows the lives of two act­iv­ists, both from purple Pennsylvania, but from dif­fer­ent strains of the move­ment.

Katy Ab­ram is a young moth­er and polit­ic­al novice who sud­denly gets thrust in­to the spot­light after her con­front­a­tion with the late Sen. Ar­len Specter goes vir­al, lead­ing to cable news ap­pear­ances and a job with Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, a na­tion­al tea party group. John Stahl, a lifelong Re­pub­lic­an act­iv­ist and former state le­gis­lat­or from a de­pressed mill town, starts his own tea party group while strug­gling to care for his ail­ing moth­er without put­ting her on pub­lic as­sist­ance.

There is no voice over, no stat­ist­ics, no ar­gu­ment, and only one ques­tion from the dir­ect­ors. The res­ult is a deeply in­formed piece of cinéma vérité that chal­lenges pre-ex­ist­ing views of the tea party move­ment by present­ing an in­tim­ate and com­pas­sion­ate — if not en­tirely flat­ter­ing — por­trait of its two main char­ac­ters. The fol­low­ing con­ver­sa­tion with the film­makers is ed­ited for brev­ity and clar­ity.

What made you want to make a doc­u­ment­ary about the tea party?

Petten­gill: We were look­ing from some in-depth cov­er­age of what was really hap­pen­ing here, and wer­en’t really find­ing it in the shal­low news cov­er­age. We wanted a long-term, in-depth ex­plor­a­tion of who these people were, where they were com­ing from, and what their lives were like, and we thought the way to do that was to fol­low them for sev­er­al years in a really in­tim­ate way.

When did you first meet Katy?

Wignot: We ini­tially wanted people from across the coun­try, but then found Katy’s now-in­fam­ous rant. For her to go, in 30 seconds, from an­onym­ous novice to new face of this move­ment was very in­ter­est­ing to us. We first met her in May of 2010, film­ing star­ted that sum­mer, and then fol­lowed her through Novem­ber of last year and ed­ited un­til Feb­ru­ary of 2013.

Petten­gill: When we star­ted the film, we didn’t know what would hap­pen. Maybe the tea party will die in two months, and then the rest of the film will be like, what does Katy do next?

You’re two film­makers from Brook­lyn, which sug­gests to me you’re not ex­actly tea parti­ers yourselves. What changed about your views of the tea party in mak­ing this film?

Wignot: What I real­ized that the move­ment was more than about any spe­cif­ic policy, it was about a deep un­cer­tainty about Amer­ica’s stand­ing. We all felt it in the wake of this fin­an­cial col­lapse, but it was kind of the last straw for some. They feel their val­ues were be­ing sup­planted by something un­known and feel like they are be­ing pushed aside. It’s a sense that their Amer­ic­an­ness is jeop­ardy.

Petten­gill: In that un­cer­tainty, there’s an amaz­ing sense of iden­tity and se­cur­ity that comes from be­ing en­gaged and feel­ing like you can make a dif­fer­ence in the most im­port­ant is­sues of the day. Both Katy and John get a lot out of their polit­ic­al activ­ity. It’s al­most like a hobby, but bet­ter. You could join the quilt­ing bee, or you could feel like you were al­ter­ing the course of his­tory. What could be a more sat­is­fy­ing use of your time?

Do lib­er­als fun­da­ment­ally mis­un­der­stand the tea party? Do you ever find your­self de­fend­ing them?

Petten­gill: The ra­cism charge. It’s not so simple that Obama is black and that’s the source of everything. Obama is a sym­bol of all the changes that have happened in this coun­try and how the na­tion no longer looks or feels like the one that is fa­mil­i­ar to them, so there is ob­vi­ously race in­volved, but that’s the thing I spend the most time adding nu­ance to.

What was the re­ac­tion from Katy and John?

Wignot: Katy really en­joyed it, but there are parts that are un­com­fort­able for her, like watch­ing her views do a 180 on Mitt Rom­ney. That’s dif­fi­cult, es­pe­cially for a wo­men who’s really com­mit­ted to her prin­ciples.

As for John, the last we heard from him was the phone call we show it the film the day after Elec­tion Day 2012, when he re­fused to meet with us. After the loss, he be­came ex­tremely pess­im­ist­ic about the dir­ec­tion of the coun­try and thinks we’re head­ing to­wards an­oth­er civil war. We tried call­ing, wrote notes, any­thing we could think of to re­gain con­tact with him, but heard noth­ing back.

Petten­gill: John’s ex­per­i­ence is a real bell­weth­er. Demo­graph­ic shifts are part of what’s caus­ing this deep anxi­ety, and be­ing in the com­munity where John lives, you can be­gin to un­der­stand it. Read­ing was a fairly middle-class man­u­fac­tur­ing town and be­came poorest city in the county while we were film­ing there, and it’s be­com­ing ma­jor­ity His­pan­ic.

Where do you think the tea party goes from here?

Wignot: There is a kind of lib­er­al sense that this will all go away and that this doesn’t mat­ter, but the forces be­hind it — demo­graph­ic shifts, eco­nom­ic un­cer­tainty — aren’t go­ing any­where, and for the fore­see­able fu­ture, it’s go­ing to con­tin­ue.

Petten­gill: You can’t just fact check them out of ex­ist­ence. Part of their suc­cess is just the amount of time, work, and ded­ic­a­tion they put in­to it. I just don’t know people on the left who are com­par­able. And that gives them a big in­flu­ence. We cap­tured a mo­ment of na­tion­al trans­ition. We hope this film can live on as a way to look at what things look like as they shift.

What We're Following See More »
17 ARRESTED
Trump’s First California Rally Turns Ugly
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump held his first rally in California Thursday night, and things were chaotic: "Hundreds of demonstrators filled the street outside the Orange County amphitheater where ... stomping on cars, hurling rocks at motorists and forcefully declaring their opposition to the Republican presidential candidate. Traffic came to a halt as a boisterous crowd walked in the roadway, some waving American and Mexican flags. Protesters smashed a window on at least one police cruiser, punctured the tires of a police sport utility vehicle, and at one point tried to flip a police car."

Source:
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
BUT WOULD HE THROW THE CHAIR?
Bobby Knight: Trump Would Drop the Bomb Just Like Truman
16 hours ago
THE LATEST
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
×