Welcome Home, Tim Geithner

You can’t blame the former Treasury chief for cashing in. But let’s not whitewash him either.

Geithner: Believes swaps have less risk.
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
See more stories about...
Michael Hirsh
Nov. 18, 2013, 9:32 a.m.

No one should be­grudge Timothy Geithner his new job. It was in­ev­it­able that a man who had been spir­itu­ally cap­tured by Wall Street would someday join it in the flesh. In truth the former Treas­ury sec­ret­ary held out far longer than the band of Ru­bin­ites he sprang from. And by join­ing a re­spect­able private-equity firm, War­burg Pin­cus — rather than one of the banks he bailed out — at least Geithner is avoid­ing the path to repu­ta­tion­al ru­in fol­lowed by his ment­or, Robert Ru­bin, who while he was in Wash­ing­ton freed up Cit­ig­roup to be­come an eco­nomy-des­troy­ing mon­ster and then went to Wall Street to join it, stand­ing by in be­fuddle­ment while the bank nearly im­ploded.

Geithner has a fam­ily to feed after all; he has every right to cash in with the vast in­dustry he saved and pro­tec­ted. It seems a bit over­ripe for Den­nis Kelle­her, head of the Bet­ter Mar­kets ad­vocacy group, to sug­gest that Geithner’s “spin through the re­volving door” will “fur­ther erode pub­lic con­fid­ence in gov­ern­ment,” when such con­fid­ence is all but un­detect­able today.

But neither should Geithner get a full pass, as CN­BC’s Ben White seems all too eager to give him in a Web piece today.

CN­BC, of course, tends to cov­er Wall Street in some­what the way Pravda once covered the So­viet Uni­on, with a lot of boos­t­er­ism and without ask­ing too many fun­da­ment­al ques­tions. But White, who also writes for Politico, is a re­spect­able fin­an­cial re­port­er and should know bet­ter. White ar­gues that the cri­ti­cism of Geithner “neg­lects to men­tion” that the former Treas­ury chief  “in­her­ited the Wall Street bail­out” and “fails to ask the fun­da­ment­al ques­tion of what, ex­actly, the ad­min­is­tra­tion was sup­posed to do with the bank­ing sec­tor, let it fail and turn a crush­ing re­ces­sion in­to a last­ing de­pres­sion?”

This is an egre­gious mis­rep­res­ent­a­tion of his­tory. No know­ledge­able ob­serv­er doubts that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion in­her­ited the crisis (though Geithner, as head of the New York Fed, did not), and that the new pres­id­ent was faced with a stark choice of bail­ing out the bank­ing sec­tor in the nerve-wrack­ing months of early 2009 or send­ing the eco­nomy in­to a De­pres­sion.

But by the time Con­gress began de­bat­ing ser­i­ous re­form in late 2009, the banks were much health­i­er. The pan­ic had passed. Yet even then Geithner re­fused to tamper with their struc­ture and bal­ance sheets — to the point where even seni­or Fed of­fi­cials like Gov­ernor Dan Tarullo today think that Dodd-Frank doesn’t have enough re­straints on the banks. Geithner’s fel­low Cab­in­et mem­ber, At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er, has pub­licly ques­tioned wheth­er the banks are not only too big to fail, but also too big to pro­sec­ute.  As Har­vard Uni­versity’s Ken­neth Ro­goff, a former ad­viser to John Mc­Cain, said of Geithner in a 2011 in­ter­view with me, echo­ing the views of many fin­an­cial ex­perts: “He was too gen­er­ous to the fin­an­cial sys­tem. He fol­lowed a set of policies aimed at pre­serving the status quo.”

White also cred­its Geithner with the best of the Dodd-Frank fin­an­cial-re­form law, say­ing, “It’s a big stretch to sug­gest Geithner stood in the way of stronger re­form in or­der to win a place for him­self on Wall Street.”

A truer his­tory of that law would re­cord that Geithner res­isted many of its toughest pro­vi­sions, in­clud­ing the “Vol­ck­er Rule,” which he avoided un­til the pres­id­ent in­sisted on it. As former Fed­er­al De­pos­it In­sur­ance Corp. chief Sheila Bair wrote in her frank mem­oir this year about her ma­jor battles with Geithner, Bull by the Horns: “I couldn’t think of one Dodd-Frank re­form that Tim strongly sup­por­ted. Res­ol­u­tion au­thor­ity, de­riv­at­ives re­form, the Vol­ck­er and Collins amend­ments — he had worked to weak­en or op­pose them all.”

Geithner, in truth, of­ten seemed in deni­al of the deep­er sys­tem­ic dangers on Wall Street that he, as a mem­ber of Ru­bin’s team back in the 1990s, had helped to cre­ate. Their sig­na­ture policy, the 1999 re­peal of Glass-Steagall, en­sured there would longer be any strong fire­walls and cap­it­al buf­fers between Wall Street in­sti­tu­tions and their af­fil­i­ates, and between banks and non­banks and in­sur­ance com­pan­ies. A year later, in 2000, then-Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Lawrence Sum­mers and Geithner pushed for the Com­mod­ity Fu­tures Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Act, which cre­ated a glob­al lais­sez-faire mar­ket worth tril­lions in un­mon­itored trades. With the re­peal of Glass-Steagall, sys­tem­ic fail­ure was largely for­got­ten while at the same time, with the pas­sage of the CFMA, huge new sys­tem­ic risks were be­ing cre­ated.

Yet Geithner, throughout his ten­ure, did not ac­know­ledge these mis­takes and res­isted more fun­da­ment­al re­forms like the Vol­ck­er Rule, which harked back to the spir­it of Glass-Steagall by seek­ing to bar fed­er­ally in­sured banks from the ris­ki­est trad­ing.

Per­son­ally, I don’t be­lieve that Geithner took the po­s­i­tions he did “in or­der to win a place for him­self on Wall Street.” He’s not that kind of fel­low. I think he did it be­cause he be­lieved in Wall Street. Wel­come home, Tim.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×