Even the most optimistic interpretation of this week’s government shutdown quickly slides into the abyss of the bottomless distrust between Republicans and Democrats in the House.
The brief standoff over immigration and government funding mostly dramatized Washington’s dysfunction. But it offered one glimmer of the hope when about two dozen senators from both parties coalesced to urge a quick resolution that reopened the government.
That loose alliance is now expressing optimism it can reach agreements on other thorny issues, starting with the long-term fate of the roughly 800,000 “Dreamers” brought to the U.S. illegally as children by their parents. President Trump in September ended an Obama-era program that shielded them from deportation, though a federal district court has temporarily blocked his decision.
Yet even if the Senate can come together on the Dreamers or other issues, any such cooperation would confront the chasm between the parties in the House. GOP leaders there have already indicated they don’t feel bound even to consider the legislation if the Senate approves a deal.
Enter a new organization called With Honor.
The group, which is announcing its first campaign endorsements Thursday, has launched a major effort to elect to the House more recent military veterans who commit to working across party lines. The aim is to create a bipartisan core of House members who are inclined to seek common ground, whatever their personal views. “The goal is to get enough of a critical mass that can function as a cross-partisan coalition and is able to get things done,” said Rye Barcott, With Honor’s cofounder and CEO.
The key insight, Barcott believes, is that veterans, with their experience working in diverse teams that pursue common goals under great stress, are uniquely situated to temper the partisan hostilities in Washington. “There is some generational mind-set, in [that] a lot of these individuals are coming at this from not a particularly partisan place,” he said.
Barcott served with the Marine Corps in Africa, Bosnia, and Iraq—including a deployment to Fallujah-from 2001 to 2006. After completing his service and obtaining two graduate degrees, he spent several years working with Duke Energy in North Carolina before starting a business with another marine that invests in U.S.-based solar-energy companies.
About a year ago, Barcott says, he noticed that an unusually large number of veterans were announcing campaigns for Congress—particularly those who served after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks—about 100, by the group’s calculations. He consulted with two post-9/11 veterans already in Congress (Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher and Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton), recruited an impressive board of advisers and set a highly ambitious goal: to raise $30-35 million to elect more post-9/11 veterans from both parties to the House. From that war chest, he wants to support about 25-35 candidates with the political equivalent of “shock and awe”: independent-expenditure campaigns of about $1 million each.
Barcott says the organization will endorse from among those who pass a character screen and sign the group’s pledge, which commits them to serve with “integrity,” “civility,” and “courage.” The pledge defines “courage” as agreeing to regularly meet and cosponsor legislation with representatives from the other party. Although about two-thirds of the post-9/11 vets seeking office this year are running as Democrats, Barcott says the group will work to maintain its bipartisan balance by dividing its contributions about evenly between Democrats and Republicans.
That approach is evident in the first two endorsements With Honor is announcing Thursday, both in Texas congressional primaries. The group is backing Kenneth Sheets, a Marine veteran and self-described “limited-government conservative” running for GOP nomination to the Dallas-area seat that retiring Republican Rep. Jeb Hensarling is vacating. It is also endorsing Gina Ortiz Jones, an openly gay former Air Force intelligence officer, seeking the Democratic nomination to oppose Republican Rep. Will Hurd in San Antonio, one of the Democrats’ top 2018 targets.
The two are far apart on most issues. Sheets’s website touts his support for border security and gun ownership, and his determination to cut taxes and roll back “burdensome and unnecessary” regulations. Ortiz Jones, in an interview, stressed her support for the Affordable Care Act and ensuring legal status for the Dreamers.
Yet both second Barcott’s central insight: that veterans will be more inclined to surmount their differences to reach reasonable compromises. “The ‘With Honor’ stamp is something I look forward being able to highlight, which is that even in this political environment, there is a group of folks who want to put their country over their party,” Ortiz Jones said.
Likewise, Sheets, a former Texas state representative, told me that in the military, “we have to conduct our missions with the utmost professionalism or people die. That level of danger will … instill a willingness to work together. People who put themselves at risk for our country better understand the principle of ‘United we stand or divided we fall.’”
With Honor is swimming against the current that is transforming House elections into parliamentary contests less about individuals than about which party voters want to control the majority. Recognizing that many activists from one party will be reluctant to support candidates—however personally exemplary—from the other party, the group is allowing donors to direct their contributions only toward veterans from their own side.
But Barcott is also arguing to potential donors that both parties, and the country overall, will benefit from electing more problem-solvers. He’s about to discover whether enough donors—and voters—will accept the argument that candidates who have faced real combat are best positioned to lead Washington away from its partisan trench warfare. “We are,” Barcott acknowledged, “essentially an experiment in this.”
What We're Following See More »
"The United States is preparing to shelter as many as 20,000 migrant children on four American military bases" in Texas and Arkansas, "as federal officials struggled to carry out President Trump’s order to keep immigrant families together after they are apprehended at the border."
"House Republican leaders are further delaying a vote on a compromise immigration bill, planning to make changes to the legislation for a vote next week. The news comes after a two-hour Republican Conference meeting Thursday, in which authors of the bill walked through its contents and members raised concerns about issues the bill doesn’t address, multiple GOP lawmakers said. Many members requested the addition of a provision to require employers to use the E-Verify database to cheek the legal status of their employees."
After a conservative-backed immigration bill failed in the House, 193-231, leaders "postponed a vote on a 'compromise' immigration proposal until Friday. ... GOP leaders, however, are under no impression that they'll be able to secure the 218 votes needed in the next 24 hours to pass the text. Rather, the delay is to give members more time to read the bill."