Political Connections

Can Military Vets Bridge the House’s Partisan Divide?

A new political group hopes to elect problem-solvers from both parties.

Former Texas state Rep. Kenneth Sheets, a Marine and Iraq war veteran, is running to succeed retiring Rep. Jeb Hensarling.
AP Photo/Eric Gay
Jan. 24, 2018, 8 p.m.

Even the most optimistic interpretation of this week’s government shutdown quickly slides into the abyss of the bottomless distrust between Republicans and Democrats in the House.

The brief standoff over immigration and government funding mostly dramatized Washington’s dysfunction. But it offered one glimmer of the hope when about two dozen senators from both parties coalesced to urge a quick resolution that reopened the government.

That loose alliance is now expressing optimism it can reach agreements on other thorny issues, starting with the long-term fate of the roughly 800,000 “Dreamers” brought to the U.S. illegally as children by their parents. President Trump in September ended an Obama-era program that shielded them from deportation, though a federal district court has temporarily blocked his decision.

Yet even if the Senate can come together on the Dreamers or other issues, any such cooperation would confront the chasm between the parties in the House. GOP leaders there have already indicated they don’t feel bound even to consider the legislation if the Senate approves a deal.

Enter a new organization called With Honor.

The group, which is announcing its first campaign endorsements Thursday, has launched a major effort to elect to the House more recent military veterans who commit to working across party lines. The aim is to create a bipartisan core of House members who are inclined to seek common ground, whatever their personal views. “The goal is to get enough of a critical mass that can function as a cross-partisan coalition and is able to get things done,” said Rye Barcott, With Honor’s cofounder and CEO.

The key insight, Barcott believes, is that veterans, with their experience working in diverse teams that pursue common goals under great stress, are uniquely situated to temper the partisan hostilities in Washington. “There is some generational mind-set, in [that] a lot of these individuals are coming at this from not a particularly partisan place,” he said.

Barcott served with the Marine Corps in Africa, Bosnia, and Iraq—including a deployment to Fallujah-from 2001 to 2006. After completing his service and obtaining two graduate degrees, he spent several years working with Duke Energy in North Carolina before starting a business with another marine that invests in U.S.-based solar-energy companies.

About a year ago, Barcott says, he noticed that an unusually large number of veterans were announcing campaigns for Congress—particularly those who served after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks—about 100, by the group’s calculations. He consulted with two post-9/11 veterans already in Congress (Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher and Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton), recruited an impressive board of advisers and set a highly ambitious goal: to raise $30-35 million to elect more post-9/11 veterans from both parties to the House. From that war chest, he wants to support about 25-35 candidates with the political equivalent of “shock and awe”: independent-expenditure campaigns of about $1 million each.

Barcott says the organization will endorse from among those who pass a character screen and sign the group’s pledge, which commits them to serve with “integrity,” “civility,” and “courage.” The pledge defines “courage” as agreeing to regularly meet and cosponsor legislation with representatives from the other party. Although about two-thirds of the post-9/11 vets seeking office this year are running as Democrats, Barcott says the group will work to maintain its bipartisan balance by dividing its contributions about evenly between Democrats and Republicans.

That approach is evident in the first two endorsements With Honor is announcing Thursday, both in Texas congressional primaries. The group is backing Kenneth Sheets, a Marine veteran and self-described “limited-government conservative” running for GOP nomination to the Dallas-area seat that retiring Republican Rep. Jeb Hensarling is vacating. It is also endorsing Gina Ortiz Jones, an openly gay former Air Force intelligence officer, seeking the Democratic nomination to oppose Republican Rep. Will Hurd in San Antonio, one of the Democrats’ top 2018 targets.

The two are far apart on most issues. Sheets’s website touts his support for border security and gun ownership, and his determination to cut taxes and roll back “burdensome and unnecessary” regulations. Ortiz Jones, in an interview, stressed her support for the Affordable Care Act and ensuring legal status for the Dreamers.

Yet both second Barcott’s central insight: that veterans will be more inclined to surmount their differences to reach reasonable compromises. “The ‘With Honor’ stamp is something I look forward being able to highlight, which is that even in this political environment, there is a group of folks who want to put their country over their party,” Ortiz Jones said.

Likewise, Sheets, a former Texas state representative, told me that in the military, “we have to conduct our missions with the utmost professionalism or people die. That level of danger will … instill a willingness to work together. People who put themselves at risk for our country better understand the principle of ‘United we stand or divided we fall.’”

With Honor is swimming against the current that is transforming House elections into parliamentary contests less about individuals than about which party voters want to control the majority. Recognizing that many activists from one party will be reluctant to support candidates—however personally exemplary—from the other party, the group is allowing donors to direct their contributions only toward veterans from their own side.

But Barcott is also arguing to potential donors that both parties, and the country overall, will benefit from electing more problem-solvers. He’s about to discover whether enough donors—and voters—will accept the argument that candidates who have faced real combat are best positioned to lead Washington away from its partisan trench warfare. “We are,” Barcott acknowledged, “essentially an experiment in this.”

What We're Following See More »
Mueller's Team Down to 10 Lawyers
1 days ago

"Mueller’s team, once filled with 17 lawyers, will soon be down to 10. The special counsel’s office confirmed in recent days that Zainab Ahmad’s detail has ended, and Andrew Weissmann will soon be leaving for the private sector. No one has been charged by the special counsel since longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone was indicted in January for allegedly lying to Congress."

Rosenstein Not Leaving DOJ Yet
2 days ago
Prosecutors Weighing Whether to Charge Greg Craig
3 days ago

A long-running federal investigation into former Obama White House counsel Gregory Craig "is reaching a critical stage, presenting the Justice Department with a decision about whether to charge a prominent Democrat as part of a more aggressive crackdown on illegal foreign lobbying." Federal prosecutors in New York have transferred the case to Washington. ... The investigation centers on whether Mr. Craig should have disclosed work he did in 2012 — while he was a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom — on behalf of the Russia-aligned government of Viktor F. Yanukovych, then the president of Ukraine. The work was steered to Mr. Craig by Paul Manafort."

Feds Raided Broidy's Offices Last Year
3 days ago

"Federal authorities raided the office of Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy last summer, seeking records related to his dealings with foreign officials and Trump administration associates, according to a sealed search warrant obtained by ProPublica. Agents were authorized to use the megadonor’s hands and face to unlock any phones that required fingerprint or facial scans."

House Approves Resolution to Release Mueller Report, 420-0
1 weeks ago

"The House on Thursday overwhelmingly passed a resolution calling on the Justice Department to make special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings and full report public and available to Congress. The 420-0 vote came after a fiery debate on the House floor, during which some Democratic lawmakers were admonished for their criticisms of President Donald Trump. Republicans said the resolution was unnecessary and a waste of time, but ultimately joined Democrats to approve it. Four Republicans — Reps. Justin Amash of Michigan, Matt Gaetz of Florida, Paul Gosar of Arizona, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky — voted 'present.'"


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.