Medicaid Work Requirements Spur Uncertainty, Legal Challenges

Experts caution there could be effects on everyone in the program, not just the intended targets.

Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin meeting with President Trump at the White House on Jan. 11.
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
Erin Durkin
Add to Briefcase
Erin Durkin
Jan. 17, 2018, 8 p.m.

The Trump administration’s move allowing states to impose work requirements in Medicaid for the first time could have a broader impact on Americans in the entitlement program than intended, experts warn, with the policy shift leading to an increased chance of disenrollment for many patients.

Potentially 1.7 million people could be directly affected by the change, according to estimates from the Kaiser Family Foundation. Under the pathway laid out for states last week, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will permit states to test work requirements for non-elderly, nonpregnant adult beneficiaries who are eligible for the program on a basis other than disability.

A day later, Kentucky became the first state to get a program approved that would require all able-bodied working-age adults to clock in at least 80 hours a month. Gov. Matt Bevin’s office described the program as a way to improve participants’ health and strengthen Medicaid’s long-term fiscal sustainability.

Although the requirements would apply only to certain beneficiaries, experts caution they could end up affecting all populations in Medicaid and result in the program dropping people who need care.

Most of the non-elderly Medicaid adults either are working already or face significant barriers to work, according to Kaiser, meaning the requirements would be imposed on only 7 percent of the population. But there are implications for everyone due to the documentation required.

“There is a real risk of eligible people losing coverage due to their inability to navigate these processes, miscommunication, or other breakdowns in the administrative process,” stated Kaiser in a brief released Tuesday. “People with disabilities may have challenges navigating the system to obtain an exemption for which they qualify and end up losing coverage.”

The overall effect of the requirements will depend on the way states implement them, Avalere Health President Dan Mendelson said. “It’s conceivable that you could stimulate some individuals to work that hadn’t been working before and that it would have a positive effect, but it’s equally conceivable that the net effects of this will result in denial of care to people who really need it,” he said.

Some experts expressed concern that the exemptions outlined in the CMS guidelines are not strong enough to ensure that people who cannot work won’t fall through the cracks. The guidance indicates that people who are eligible for Medicaid based on disability should be exempted, but that’s a narrow category, said Hannah Katch, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

“People with a mental-health disorder, someone who was injured at work and can’t work, someone with uncontrolled diabetes who sometimes can work but sometimes not—none of those people would meet that definition, and so any of them could lose their health coverage as a result of this policy,” Katch said.

CMS’s restriction on states using Medicaid funds to remove challenges to work, such as child care or transportation, has also sparked criticism from opponents. “The bottom line here: This policy is not about helping people work; it’s just about taking health coverage from people who are unemployed,” Katch said.

Some people could also become ineligible for Medicaid in certain states by working at minimum wage, the Kaiser brief notes—and they could potentially be left without an employer-sponsored alternative.

But the change to states’ Medicaid programs does not carry the permanence that a change in statute would. This is because states are using a waiver process that allows them to get the requirements approved by the Health and Human Services Department as a so-called demonstration project.

“I think we’ll see a variety of different approaches, and the beauty is that this period will now give us some experience and that hopefully will inform longer-term policy changes,” said Nina Owcharenko Schaefer, who recently served as senior counselor to the HHS secretary and is now at the Heritage Foundation.

This mechanism, however, may also prove to be the weak spot in the federal government’s strategy, as legal questions have already started to arise in the days following the guidance’s release.

Expect litigation in the wake of the Kentucky waiver, the National Health Law Program warns, with opponents arguing it does not promote the objectives of Medicaid.

“While we are still reviewing the details of this approval … the action appears designed to achieve significant cuts in Medicaid enrollment rather than Medicaid’s stated purpose of furnishing medical assistance to low-income people,” NHeLP Legal Director Jane Perkins said in a statement.

Bevin, however, on Tuesday signed an executive order saying that Kentucky will end its Medicaid expansion if any part of the waiver is stalled in the courts.

“[A]ny delay in the implementation of the Waiver due to judicial action will cause fiscal harm to the Commonwealth and will prevent Medicaid beneficiaries from realizing the benefits under the Waiver,” the order stated.

What We're Following See More »
Theresa May Encouraging Allies to Expel Russians
35 minutes ago

"The U.K. is sharing secret intelligence about the nerve agent attack on a former spy with key allies, in an effort to persuade them to expel Russian diplomats across Europe, people familiar with the matter said. ... May will deliver a hard-hitting warning over the threat posed to the whole of Europe by Vladimir Putin’s government during a dinner with fellow leaders at the EU summit in Brussels on Thursday."

China Plans Retaliatory Sanctions
36 minutes ago

President Trump is planning to announce new sanctions against Chinese technology companies Thursday, and China may respond "by targeting U.S. agricultural exports from Farm Belt states," including "soybeans, sorghum and live hogs ... The U.S. is among the top suppliers of these products to China." The Chinese sanctions are being calibrated to target states "that helped elect Donald Trump in 2016."

Charges Dropped Against Erdogan’s Bodyguards
40 minutes ago

"Federal prosecutors have dropped charges against 11 of 15 members of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s security team who were accused in connection with the beating of protesters during their visit to Washington last year, the latest twist in a case that caused a diplomatic rift between the U.S. and Turkey. The decision by the U.S. to prosecute the 15 men added to political strains as the Trump administration was trying to reset relations with Turkey, a key U.S. ally in the fight against Islamic State. Prosecutors first asked a judge in November to dismiss charges against four members of Mr. Erdogan’s security detail. Then they dropped charges against seven others on Feb. 14, the day before Secretary of State Rex Tillerson flew to Ankara for a meeting with Mr. Erdogan meant to ease tensions."

Omnibus Released
13 hours ago

The $1.3 trillion agreement to fund the government through the rest of the fiscal year is expected to come up for a vote in the House soon.

How Trade Associations Come Down on the Tariffs
17 hours ago

The Economist


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.