Gillibrand, McCaskill Duel for Votes on Sex Assault Bill

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 19: Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) speaks at a news conference supporting passage of the Military Justice Improvement Act November 19, 2013 in Washington, DC. The legislation would help address increasing numbers of sexual assaults in the U.S. military by establishing an independent military justice system. Also pictured are (L-R) Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-NY), former U.S. Marine Sarah Plummer, Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV) and U.S. Army veteran Kate Weber.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Nov. 19, 2013, 2:48 p.m.

Though sen­at­ors have had months to think through their po­s­i­tion on meas­ures to curb mil­it­ary sexu­al as­saults, more than 20 have shied away from tak­ing pub­lic po­s­i­tions — in­clud­ing ma­jor fig­ures such as Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., and Ma­jor­ity Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

Some Sen­ate aides say privately they be­lieve that many just do not want to ad­mit they are plan­ning to op­pose the le­gis­la­tion head­ing to the floor, and they want to avoid tak­ing a stand on an is­sue the Pentagon is heav­ily lob­by­ing.

Still, many of those sen­at­ors who say they are on the fence ap­pear to be hung up over lo­gist­ic­al ques­tions sur­round­ing how the amend­ment sponsored by Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand, D-N.Y. — which would re­move as­sault cases from the chain of com­mand — would work.

With the ad­di­tion­al sup­port of Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., and Sens. Dean Heller, R-Nev., and Cory Book­er, D-N.J., an­nounced this week, the bill has 50 sen­at­ors pub­licly be­hind it but is still shy of the 60 needed, as the vote ap­proaches.

“I per­son­ally will make sure I call or speak to every single un­de­cided sen­at­or today,” Gil­librand said Tues­day. She has en­lis­ted former mil­it­ary lead­ers and sur­viv­ors of mil­it­ary sexu­al as­sault to make per­son­al ap­peals to se­lect col­leagues, and she as­serts that 20 to 25 sen­at­ors are un­de­cided.

Yet even as these fence-sit­ters mull their op­tions, those choices are in­creas­ing, as an amend­ment by Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., has emerged as a primary al­tern­at­ive to Gil­librand’s le­gis­la­tion. It would add ad­di­tion­al mod­est re­forms that en­joy broad bi­par­tis­an sup­port and are ex­pec­ted to be eas­ily ad­op­ted.

And Mc­Caskill her­self has emerged as the lead op­pon­ent to Gil­librand’s ef­fort.

Mc­Caskill says that per­haps only five or six sen­at­ors are un­de­cided, and she in­sists that her ef­forts lob­by­ing col­leagues against Gil­librand’s amend­ment are about en­sur­ing the best policy to ad­dress sexu­al as­saults.

“Policy mat­ters,” she said. “This is just about the policy: what is best for vic­tims, what will put more per­pet­rat­ors in pris­on.”

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., has not de­clared a po­s­i­tion pub­licly. “I’ve just been care­ful about this,” he said. “I want to com­pare Gil­librand’s pro­pos­al to the steps that the mil­it­ary is tak­ing on their own and what’s in the un­der­ly­ing bill.”

Murphy ad­ded, “The un­der­ly­ing is­sue for me is what will cut down on re­tali­ation; the fear of re­tali­ation is what prompts a lot of these crimes to go un­re­por­ted, and I thought from the very be­gin­ning it is not a clear-cut case that an out­side re­port­ing sys­tem will ne­ces­sar­ily cut down on re­tali­ation. It likely will in­crease pro­sec­u­tions, but I’m still tak­ing a look at the is­sue of re­tali­ation.”

Murphy said he has talked to Mc­Caskill, Gil­librand, Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Carl Lev­in, D-Mich., and the De­fense De­part­ment.

He said some of the Pentagon’s ar­gu­ments leave him un­per­suaded.

“Their ar­gu­ment is that the chain of com­mand will be dam­aged. I’m also not con­vinced of that ar­gu­ment. I’m not sure why a com­mand­ing of­ficer would care any less about root­ing out sexu­al as­sault simply be­cause he doesn’t have pro­sec­utori­al power any longer”¦. I don’t really think the sky will fall if you set up a pro­cess out­side the chain of com­mand to fer­ret out the worst crimes.”

Greg Jac­ob, the policy dir­ect­or with the Ser­vice Wo­men’s Ac­tion Net­work, said his group is field­ing sev­er­al tech­nic­al ques­tions.

“All the of­fices we are talk­ing to, they are not just un­de­cided just to be un­de­cided,” he said. “They really have ques­tions. They are really drilling down and ask­ing for de­tailed ex­plan­a­tions on this stuff — wheth­er it’s the bill, wheth­er it’s mil­it­ary law, they want to make the right de­cision. For them, it is a big deal.”

Gil­librand has mod­i­fied her amend­ment so it would ap­ply to any ma­jor crime that is pun­ish­able by a year or more in pris­on, but it would ex­empt 37 spe­cif­ic mil­it­ary crimes.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×