Trump’s Standing Lower Than Predecessors’ Before Midterm Losses

His advisers are starting the year divided over what should be next legislatively.

Hanna Trudo
Add to Briefcase
Hanna Trudo
Jan. 2, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

“As the 2018 election year begins, one question above all is likely to shape its outcome: Will Americans vote to constrain President Donald Trump by electing a Democrat-led Congress that will challenge and resist him, or to empower the Republicans who are increasingly working in harness with him? … The ominous precedent for Republicans is that Trump’s standing with the public now is weaker than each of” his three most recent “predecessors’ was when their party lost unified control during midterm elections” of 1994, 2006, and 2010. (CNN)

“After ending their first year on a high, signing a sweeping tax reform bill into law,” President Trump’s advisers “are divided about how to capitalize on that victory and maintain momentum going forward with Hill Republicans again at odds over their legislative agenda.

“They’re facing a brain drain on a White House that already had trouble recruiting top talent. Many senior West Wing aides are expected to depart in the coming year, with no replacements lined up. White House chief of staff John Kelly–who has already fired several presidential aides–wants to push out more, but has struggled to find suitable alternatives.

“And they’re still working under the shadow of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, despite repeated assurances from the White House legal team that the inquiry is wrapping up.” (Politico)

RUSSIA. In a wide-ranging interview, Trump said over the holiday break that he believes Mueller will be fair in conducting the Russian investigation, a shift from the previous tone he has often taken when addressing the scandal. “There’s been no collusion. But I think he’s going to be fair,” he said of Mueller. (New York Times)

Meanwhile, “a growing campaign by President Trump’s most ardent supporters to discredit the special counsel … and the law enforcement agencies assisting his investigation is opening new fissures in the Republican Party, with some lawmakers questioning the damage being done to federal law enforcement and to a political party that has long championed law and order.

“A small but vocal group of conservative lawmakers, much of the conservative media and, at times, the president himself have launched a series of attacks to paint not only Mr. Mueller but institutions once considered sacrosanct to Republicans like the F.B.I. and Justice Department as dangerously biased against Mr. Trump. One of them, Representative Francis Rooney of Florida, called on Tuesday for top F.B.I. and Justice Department officials to be ‘purged.’

“Now some Republican lawmakers are speaking out, worried that Trump loyalists, hoping for short-term gain, could wind up staining the party, dampening morale at the F.B.I. and Justice Department, and potentially recasting Democrats as the true friends of law enforcement for years to come.” (New York Times)

2020. “Many Democrats and some Republicans predict there’s a chance Trump may not be on the ballot in 2020 for any number of reasons: He resigns; gets removed from office; chooses not to seek re-election; or loses in a GOP primary. Steve Bannon, the former White House chief strategist, placed Trump’s odds of completing his first term at 30 percent.

“But Trump, who filed the paperwork for re-election the day he took office, is already testing out campaign themes on the trail. Speaking at a rally in Pensacola, Florida, last month, Trump said the next election will boil down to the performance of the stock market.”

“There’s been a lot of chatter in political circles about Trump facing a primary challenger—perhaps Ohio Gov. John Kasich, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska or retiring Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, a vocal critic of the president. Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, who campaigned for Clinton in 2016, has said that if he runs for president, he will probably do so as a Republican.” (NBC News)

RNC. “Fresh from interviewing former White House press secretary Sean Spicer over what he was doing on the fifth floor of Trump Tower on election night, Democrats now want to interview former Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus.

“Spicer’s presence that night has caused some unease among Republicans because the expiration of a 35-year-old settlement, or consent decree, barring the RNC from engaging in ballot security operations may depend on it. The fifth floor … was the nerve center of then-candidate Donald Trump’s poll-watching operations. … The Democratic request to interview Priebus may be the last gasp in the party’s quest to keep the consent decree alive.” (Politico)

IOWA. “Iowa has seemingly soured on the president and his party.” The end-of-year Iowa Poll (Dec. 3-6; 802 Iowa adults; 3.5%), “an industry standard conducted by Des Moines-based Selzer and Co., found Trump with just 35% approval in the state. Only 34% of Iowans said they would back Republicans for Congress in 2018, and 61% said they were turned off by politics altogether.

“The discrepancy between the rosy economic picture and the public’s distaste for Trump in Iowa has confounded both parties and complicated one of the major political stories of the decade—the Republican romp through the Midwest.

“Why Iowa has turned against Trump and Republicans is a mystery that both parties are eager to figure out ahead of the 2018 midterms, looking to understand whether it’s an aberration or a sign of a greater political trend.” (Washington Post)

IDAHO. The agenda during the Idaho GOP’s winter meeting “includes a proposal asking Republican candidates to disclose their support of the Idaho party platform. If approved, the chairman would be required to announce which candidates either failed to support the whole oath or took exceptions to parts of it.

“The party dumped the so-called loyalty oath last year after first adopting it in 2011. Opponents argued the oath was used to narrow the party’s base, rather than promote healthy debate, by pinpointing candidates as ‘unfaithful’ to the GOP.” (AP)

What We're Following See More »
Trump Backtracks on Putin's "Incredible Offer"
2 days ago
Russians Refer to "Verbal Agreements" with Trump
3 days ago

"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.

Trump Was Shown Proof of Russian Interference Before Inauguration
3 days ago

"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."

Trump: High IQ People Loved the Putin Meeting
3 days ago
Comey Says to Vote Democratic This Fall
4 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.