Big business wants to get more involved in Republican primaries. It does so at its own peril.
On Wednesday, the Club for Growth criticized GOP Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho for accepting the endorsement of the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry, a business group that recently decided to support expanding Medicaid in the state as part of the Affordable Care Act. Many conservatives consider backing any part of Obamacare heresy, and a spokesman for the free-market group questioned whether Simpson thought the same way.
“Does Mike Simpson support or oppose expanding Medicaid under Obamacare in Idaho, just as his supporters in the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry do?” said Club spokesman Barney Keller. “Medicaid expansion will cost taxpayers billions and stick future generations with the bill. Conservatives across the country are rejecting Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion, and Mike Simpson should have to answer if he joins with the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry in supporting Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion in Idaho.”
The Club has endorsed Simpson’s primary opponent, lawyer Bryan Smith, making the state’s 2nd District race one of the premier battles between establishment and conservative Republicans. The IACI, meanwhile, has not only announced its support of Simpson, it has formed a super PAC to help him win reelection. After the government shutdown in October, business groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said they would begin to aggressively support business-friendly Republicans over tea-party conservatives.
But as Wednesday’s episode demonstrates, their increased involvement carries risk for themselves and the candidates they back. Candidates who ally themselves with business risk being seen as the establishment choice, which some conservatives see as synonymous with being too moderate. As the Club did, they will question whether Simpson — who has voted to repeal Obamacare dozens of times in Congress — is OK with Medicaid expansion in Idaho.
In other words, the groups’ involvement can hurt more than it helps. It’s why some political operatives working with them are deeply skeptical they can do anything to affect the outcome of these primaries.
The Simpson campaign, which was also endorsed by Mitt Romney earlier this week, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.