Burdened by the botched rollout of his health care law, President Obama has run out of good options.
He can stick to a policy he fought for and believes in, or he can throw a political lifeline to Democrats who are panicked, furious at the administration, and doing their best to keep the Senate in Democratic hands. He can’t do both.
Obama has already tried to thread this needle once, with his “fix” to address a wave of canceled insurance plans — or, more accurately, to address the bad publicity surrounding canceled insurance plans. His announcement gave Democrats some breathing room, but it frustrated allies who are more committed to the Affordable Care Act’s policies than to the party that passed them.
If Congressional Democrats keep fretting and Obama keeps caving, the allies say, the party risks tinkering its way into a political and policy disaster: a malfunctioning law full of half-measures that neither delivers on its promises nor provides anything for embattled Democrats to rally around.
“I’m concerned that the political difficulties of the moment are going to undermine the basic foundation on which the statute is built,” said Tim Jost, a Washington & Lee University law professor and a strong supporter of the health care law.
Obama’s own political legacy is on the line with health care. He needs the law to work in the long run, and even innocuous-seeming political concessions now can create bigger problems down the road. Even a change as minor as extending the law’s enrollment window, as Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., has proposed, could have unintended consequences. It’s the defined enrollment period that stops healthy people from taking their chances without insurance and signing up on their way to the emergency room if they need it.
“Our starting point has to be that anything you do right now makes the policy worse,” said Jonathan Gruber, a health care economist at MIT who helped design the law. “I think the policy will work if we leave it alone.”
That’s an increasingly hard sell, though, for congressional Democrats who have already followed Obama this far down the road, only to end up with a broken website and a raging controversy over canceled insurance plans.
Democrats essentially gave up years ago trying to reverse the law’s stubbornly ambivalent polling, saying the law would work once it was in place and everything would be fine. But that strategy hinged on the White House implementing the law well, and instead the administration delivered a bungled website whose high-profile failure made the inevitable stories about plan cancellations worse.
Now, negative perceptions are being cemented and rank-and-file lawmakers want to show their constituents either an improvement or a vote in favor of an improvement. A detailed explanation of the best ways to structure an insurance market won’t cut it.
Obama tried to deliver, but Democrats left their options open even after he announced his administrative “fix” for canceled plans, with in-cycle Senate Democrat Mary Landrieu, D-La., saying legislation was needed to make the change stick.
Policy-minded supporters of the health care law are unhappy too and worried about Obama’s willingness to wade into the issue. The way Obama addressed the issue was the “least bad thing you could do,” Gruber said, but going any further ““ as many congressional Democrats want to do ““ would only further perpetuate the two-tiered system that Obamacare is trying to equalize.
On its face, the tradeoff underlying the Affordable Care Act seems simple: Guarantee coverage to sick people, and bring healthy people into the system to offset the cost. The execution of that balance, though, is complicated. It relies on a web of specific policies that work together. Many of those specific tools ““ such as pushing healthy people off of their inexpensive plans ““ are unpopular on their own.
But pulling on any one of those threads — and there are no fewer than four Democratic plans that would do just that — could upset the law’s built-in efforts to get people covered and avoid major premium hikes next year. Letting more people keep old health care plans would upset that balance. So would delaying the individual mandate, as Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. Va., has proposed. Even Shaheen’s innocuous-looking proposal to extend the window to buy coverage is making insurance companies nervous.
All of those bills would chip away, to some extent, at policies designed to push young, healthy people into Obamacare’s marketplaces. And getting young people to sign up is the key to the law’s ultimate success.
“I would really hope that there would be some fortitude in the face of all this “¦ I can understand that they’re nervous, but I hope they can keep a longer perspective on things,” Jost said.
Obamacare Delays May Create Election Bomb for Democrats
Insurance cancellations and the employer mandate will both hit just before the 2014 midterms.
What We're Following See More »
The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."
"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.
"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.
Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.