Burdened by the botched rollout of his health care law, President Obama has run out of good options.
He can stick to a policy he fought for and believes in, or he can throw a political lifeline to Democrats who are panicked, furious at the administration, and doing their best to keep the Senate in Democratic hands. He can’t do both.
Obama has already tried to thread this needle once, with his “fix” to address a wave of canceled insurance plans — or, more accurately, to address the bad publicity surrounding canceled insurance plans. His announcement gave Democrats some breathing room, but it frustrated allies who are more committed to the Affordable Care Act’s policies than to the party that passed them.
If Congressional Democrats keep fretting and Obama keeps caving, the allies say, the party risks tinkering its way into a political and policy disaster: a malfunctioning law full of half-measures that neither delivers on its promises nor provides anything for embattled Democrats to rally around.
“I’m concerned that the political difficulties of the moment are going to undermine the basic foundation on which the statute is built,” said Tim Jost, a Washington & Lee University law professor and a strong supporter of the health care law.
Obama’s own political legacy is on the line with health care. He needs the law to work in the long run, and even innocuous-seeming political concessions now can create bigger problems down the road. Even a change as minor as extending the law’s enrollment window, as Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., has proposed, could have unintended consequences. It’s the defined enrollment period that stops healthy people from taking their chances without insurance and signing up on their way to the emergency room if they need it.
“Our starting point has to be that anything you do right now makes the policy worse,” said Jonathan Gruber, a health care economist at MIT who helped design the law. “I think the policy will work if we leave it alone.”
That’s an increasingly hard sell, though, for congressional Democrats who have already followed Obama this far down the road, only to end up with a broken website and a raging controversy over canceled insurance plans.
Democrats essentially gave up years ago trying to reverse the law’s stubbornly ambivalent polling, saying the law would work once it was in place and everything would be fine. But that strategy hinged on the White House implementing the law well, and instead the administration delivered a bungled website whose high-profile failure made the inevitable stories about plan cancellations worse.
Now, negative perceptions are being cemented and rank-and-file lawmakers want to show their constituents either an improvement or a vote in favor of an improvement. A detailed explanation of the best ways to structure an insurance market won’t cut it.
Obama tried to deliver, but Democrats left their options open even after he announced his administrative “fix” for canceled plans, with in-cycle Senate Democrat Mary Landrieu, D-La., saying legislation was needed to make the change stick.
Policy-minded supporters of the health care law are unhappy too and worried about Obama’s willingness to wade into the issue. The way Obama addressed the issue was the “least bad thing you could do,” Gruber said, but going any further ““ as many congressional Democrats want to do ““ would only further perpetuate the two-tiered system that Obamacare is trying to equalize.
On its face, the tradeoff underlying the Affordable Care Act seems simple: Guarantee coverage to sick people, and bring healthy people into the system to offset the cost. The execution of that balance, though, is complicated. It relies on a web of specific policies that work together. Many of those specific tools ““ such as pushing healthy people off of their inexpensive plans ““ are unpopular on their own.
But pulling on any one of those threads — and there are no fewer than four Democratic plans that would do just that — could upset the law’s built-in efforts to get people covered and avoid major premium hikes next year. Letting more people keep old health care plans would upset that balance. So would delaying the individual mandate, as Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. Va., has proposed. Even Shaheen’s innocuous-looking proposal to extend the window to buy coverage is making insurance companies nervous.
All of those bills would chip away, to some extent, at policies designed to push young, healthy people into Obamacare’s marketplaces. And getting young people to sign up is the key to the law’s ultimate success.
“I would really hope that there would be some fortitude in the face of all this “¦ I can understand that they’re nervous, but I hope they can keep a longer perspective on things,” Jost said.
Obamacare Delays May Create Election Bomb for Democrats
Insurance cancellations and the employer mandate will both hit just before the 2014 midterms.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."