How Harry Reid Keeps Democrats in Lockstep

Senate Democrats have displayed remarkable discipline because Harry Reid so rarely asks it of them.

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks to members of the media after the Senate Democratic weekly policy luncheon November 19, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Michael Catalin and Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin Shane Goldmacher
Nov. 21, 2013, 9:03 a.m.

Harry Re­id doesn’t rule his Sen­ate Demo­crats with an iron fist. For the most part, the ma­jor­ity lead­er is fine with his col­leagues speak­ing their minds and be­ing flex­ible in their votes. He asks for party dis­cip­line only when it mat­ters. And with the rol­lout of Pres­id­ent Obama’s sig­na­ture health law fa­cing severe tur­bu­lence, it mat­ters now.

Signs of un­rest abound. Most prom­in­ently, Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., is back­ing a le­gis­lat­ive fix to the health pro­gram’s can­celed in­sur­ance policies, des­pite Obama’s in­sist­ence that he’s hand­ling it ad­min­is­trat­ively. Still, there has been no open re­bel­lion. Re­id’s troops are com­plain­ing about the pres­id­ent; they’re not set­ting out to em­bar­rass their lead­er.

Even Re­pub­lic­ans are im­pressed by how Re­id’s troops are fall­ing in line. “Frankly, I’m amazed that they stick to­geth­er as well as they do, be­cause it’s not in their best in­terests to fol­low some of the things that the lead­er­ship de­mands of them,” said Sen. Or­rin Hatch, R-Utah.

Dur­ing the re­cent gov­ern­ment shut­down, Sen­ate Demo­crats un­an­im­ously swat­ted away bill after bill au­thored by House Re­pub­lic­ans, even as the meas­ures were de­signed to em­bar­rass the Demo­crats and feed in­to 2014 at­tack ads. Re­id’s lead­er­ship looked more re­mark­able when com­pared with the un­rest on the oth­er side of the Cap­it­ol, where House Speak­er John Boehner has muddled through a series of in­tern­al de­fec­tions and in­sur­rec­tions in the last year.

There’s noth­ing par­tic­u­larly fanci­ful about Re­id’s tac­tics. The Nevadan grinds out long hours listen­ing to his party’s sen­at­ors, of­ten tak­ing their calls or drop-ins in the midst of oth­er meet­ings. He shields them from as many dif­fi­cult votes as pos­sible.

Most im­port­ant, he gives al­most total lat­it­ude to sen­at­ors who are next up on the bal­lot.

“The first people you give passes to are the most vul­ner­able,” said a seni­or Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide. It’s no co­in­cid­ence that the only four de­fec­tions when Sen­ate Demo­crats passed a budget earli­er this year were mem­bers fa­cing reelec­tion in 2014 in states that Mitt Rom­ney car­ried. Those who had just won in such states — Sens. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri, and Jon Test­er of Montana — car­ried the vot­ing load. “When you’re up, you’re up. When you’re not up, you’re to help those who are up,” the lead­er­ship aide said.

To hear Sen. Bri­an Schatz of Hawaii tell it, Re­id spends a lot of his time as a so­cial work­er coun­sel­ing needy sen­at­ors, each with his or her own spe­cif­ic prob­lem — a tough race back home, a con­tested primary (as in Schatz’s case), or a par­tic­u­lar home-state in­dustry that needs a boost.

“It’s mem­ber man­age­ment and mak­ing sure that every­body’s home-state pri­or­it­ies and polit­ic­al pre­dis­pos­i­tions are ac­coun­ted for, and that’s no small task,” Schatz said. “He’s been ex­traordin­ary in his abil­ity to keep us to­geth­er.”

Re­id’s No. 1 un­writ­ten rule: no sur­prises. Sen. Max Baucus of Montana vi­ol­ated that edict back in March when he voted against his party’s budget — the meas­ure passed 50-49 — des­pite chair­ing the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee. Re­id’s team didn’t know Baucus’s no vote was com­ing, aides have said; they were even more taken aback when Baucus an­nounced his re­tire­ment a month later: He had voted against the budget and wouldn’t even be fa­cing the elect­or­ate again.

Chris Kofinis, a former chief of staff to Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia, per­haps the Sen­ate’s most mod­er­ate Demo­crat, said Re­id’s op­er­a­tion nev­er once pun­ished Manchin for veer­ing from the party line. “There was al­ways un­der­stand­ing about what you needed to do,” Kofinis said.

Kofinis said Re­id and his top ad­viser, Chief of Staff Dav­id Krone, were al­ways avail­able to talk ahead of key votes. “They build sup­port the old-fash­ioned way,” he said. “They earn it.”

Re­pub­lic­ans say Re­id has won his troops’ loy­alty by con­tort­ing the Sen­ate’s rules to stifle GOP amend­ments at will. Just this week, as the Sen­ate de­bated the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill, Re­pub­lic­ans sought to have more of their amend­ments con­sidered. Re­id said no. “Every­one has to un­der­stand that this is not go­ing to be an open amend­ment pro­cess,” Re­id said. “It is not go­ing to hap­pen.”

However Re­id built his party’s unity, the com­bin­a­tion of the dis­astrous rol­lout of the health re­form web­site — already 39 Demo­crats in the House have voted for a Re­pub­lic­an meas­ure aimed at nick­ing the law — and the loom­ing fight over re­writ­ing the Sen­ate’s rules to curb fu­ture fili­busters could prove Re­id’s biggest test yet.

Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors are lin­ing up with le­gis­lat­ive fixes for Obama­care. Manchin is sup­port­ing a GOP bill to delay the in­di­vidu­al man­date for a year. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hamp­shire has pushed le­gis­la­tion to delay the en­roll­ment dead­line by two months or more. And Alaska’s Mark Be­gich wants to cre­ate a new, cheap­er “cop­per” health care op­tion. Then there’s Landrieu’s bill to let people keep their can­celed health plans.

While red-state Demo­crats who talk about those bills — and score polit­ic­al points by pro­pos­ing them — have Re­id’s bless­ing, ac­tu­ally vot­ing on them does not. None of the meas­ures are cur­rently sched­uled for floor time. Re­id is keep­ing them at bay un­til at least Decem­ber.

How suc­cess­ful Re­id can be bey­ond that could de­pend on wheth­er the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion cleans up the health care mess. If the web­site woes, in­sur­ance can­cel­la­tions, and tales of doc­tors axed from in­sur­ance plans drag in­to the elec­tion year, Re­id may be forced to ac­com­mod­ate his vul­ner­able in­cum­bents. Whatever hap­pens, law­makers say Re­id has the in­stincts to main­tain his gov­ern­ing ma­jor­ity.

“That’s why he gets the big bucks,” Be­gich said. “That’s his role.”

What We're Following See More »
Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
2 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
4 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
6 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
6 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.

Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
7 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.