In the Aftermath of a Post-Nuclear Senate, Everyone’s Dug in Deeper

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 21: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) talks with reporters after stepping off the Senate floor at the U.S. Capitol November 21, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Senate voted 52-48 to invoke the so-called 'nuclear option', voting to change Senate rules on the controversial filibuster for most presidential nominations with a simple majority vote.
National Journal
Michael Catalin and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin Elahe Izadi
Nov. 21, 2013, 3:24 p.m.

The sun had not set on the post-nuc­le­ar Sen­ate, when Demo­crats began look­ing for­ward to con­firm­ing a slate of White House nom­in­ees as Re­pub­lic­ans dished out dooms­day fore­casts on the fu­ture of the in­sti­tu­tion.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., in­voked the rules change — first dubbed the “nuc­le­ar op­tion” and later called the “Re­id Rule” — and began a pro­cess in which ex­ec­ut­ive and ju­di­cial nom­in­ees, though not Su­preme Court justices, could be con­firmed via a simple, 51-vote ma­jor­ity.

The up­per cham­ber is on track to con­firm Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett to the U.S. Court of Ap­peals-D.C. Cir­cuit after Thanks­giv­ing re­cess, and the White House has sub­mit­ted a slate of oth­er nom­in­ees to oth­er posts. But when it comes to budget deals and oth­er le­gis­la­tion — par­tic­u­larly bills that need 60 votes to pass — the rules change hasn’t done much to cre­ate a bi­par­tis­an at­mo­sphere.

“It puts a chill on the en­tire United States Sen­ate,” said Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz. “It puts a chill on everything that re­quires bi­par­tis­an­ship.”

Mc­Cain, who reached a deal to thwart a rules change back in the sum­mer, now says it’s “too late” to forge an agree­ment to go back. He had been work­ing for two weeks to avert what happened Thursday, in­clud­ing an hour-long meet­ing in Re­id’s of­fice Wed­nes­day night.

“I’ve reached [out] un­til my arm aches, OK?” Mc­Cain said. “They are gov­erned by these hard-over, new­er mem­bers of the Demo­crat­ic caucus who have nev­er been in the minor­ity, who are primar­ily driv­ing this is­sue and they suc­ceeded. And they will pay a very, very heavy price for it.”

And what could that price be? Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., isn’t lay­ing out a play-by-play on how Re­pub­lic­ans will bite back. “I don’t think this is a time to be talk­ing about re­pris­al. I think it is a time to be sad about what’s been done to the United States Sen­ate, the greatest de­lib­er­at­ive body in the world.”

Re­pub­lic­ans, like Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina, warned that ju­di­cial nom­in­ees would be­come more and more par­tis­an be­cause, “the party in power is go­ing to be pushed by base votes,” he said. “The polit­ic­al nature of who you pick changes be­cause you are not go­ing to have to ac­com­mod­ate any­body on the oth­er side.”

In­deed, the Sen­ate Demo­crats who were most vo­cal in sup­port of the rules change did in­clude a cadre of new­er mem­bers who haven’t served in the minor­ity. Their ar­gu­ments in fa­vor of the change took hold this week, par­tic­u­larly as some of their weary, more ex­per­i­enced col­leagues felt they had no oth­er op­tions.

“I feel like we’ve been forced in­to it, and I think it’s ter­ribly un­for­tu­nate,” Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., said. “You can’t de­cide you want to re­move judges from a cir­cuit without get­ting a law passed to re­duce the num­ber of judges on that cir­cuit. You don’t get to block nom­in­ees in or­der to ef­fect le­gis­lat­ive policy, and that’s what they’re try­ing to do.”

A num­ber of Demo­crats are thrilled that, as they put it, the fever has been broken and they can move on to con­firm judges that hadn’t been blocked be­cause of their qual­i­fic­a­tions, but be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted to Obama filling the court with his choices. “I’m not afraid of demo­cracy,” said re­tir­ing Sen. Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa.

“Not un­easy at all. Happy about it,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. “I’ve been sup­port­ive of it for a long time. It took us awhile to get the whole caucus there. I am thrilled to get the Sen­ate back to work.”

Re­pub­lic­ans have ar­gued that the rules change was a dis­trac­tion, de­signed to re­move the fo­cus on the prob­lems as­so­ci­ated with the rol­lout of Obama­care. Landrieu, who faces a tough reelec­tion fight back home, countered that the rules change had noth­ing to do with the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“It had to do with the fact that the Sen­ate has been at a dead stand­still and there are a hand­ful of sen­at­ors led by Ted Cruz, sup­por­ted by Mitch Mc­Con­nell, and flamed on by Dav­id Vit­ter, that think they own this floor and they don’t,” she said. “The Amer­ic­an people do and we’re go­ing to get back to their busi­ness.”

Re­id’s chan­ging of the rules ba­sic­ally de­livered on something many Re­pub­lic­ans say they’ve been ex­pect­ing. Very “mat­ter of fact,” was how Sen. Johnny Isak­son, R-Ga., put it. “This is something that every­body thought would come, they just didn’t know when.”

“We were all tired of be­ing threatened by it,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

Oth­er law­makers tried to find a way out. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, had din­ner Monday night with a group of sen­at­ors who con­vened dur­ing the shut­down, to come up with a short-term com­prom­ise.

“It was very short­sighted of the Demo­crats to force this. There was a group of us work­ing to try to come up with some sort of com­prom­ise and I think it’s un­for­tu­nate that we were not giv­en the time to try to come up with something that might have pro­duced a dif­fer­ent end­ing,” Collins said.

Demo­crats, par­tic­u­larly the more ap­pre­hens­ive ones, were acutely aware of how their votes on Thursday could come back to haunt them. “If you’ve been around awhile, I think you worry about everything — in­clud­ing the sun com­ing up — com­ing back to haunt you,” Mc­Caskill said. “There’s noth­ing I do that I don’t worry about.”

What We're Following See More »
BIGGEST SHAKEUP OF ALL?
Bannon Is Out at the White House
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

First, it was Sean Spicer. Then Reince Priebus. Now, presidential adviser Steve Bannon, perhaps the administration's biggest lightning rod for criticism, is out. “White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and Steve Bannon have mutually agreed today would be Steve’s last day,” the White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said in a statement. “We are grateful for his service and wish him the best.” That's not to say the parting of ways isn't controversial. Bannon says he submitted his resignation on Aug. 7, but earlier today, "the president had told senior aides that he had decided to remove Mr. Bannon."

Source:
INITIATIVE TARGETED GUN RETAILERS, OTHERS
Trump Ends Obama’s “Operation Choke Point”
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration has ended Operation Choke Point, the anti-fraud initiative started under the Obama administration that many Republicans argued was used to target gun retailers and other businesses that Democrats found objectionable. Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told GOP representatives in a Wednesday letter that the long-running program had ended, bringing a conclusion to a chapter in the Obama years that long provoked and angered conservatives who saw Choke Point as an extra-legal crackdown on politically disfavored groups."

Source:
LIBERALS RAISE CONFLICT OF ISSUE QUESTIONS
Gorsuch to Deliver Speech at Trump Hotel
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Liberal groups are raising questions about a speaking appearance Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch plans to make next month at the Trump International Hotel in Washington. Gorsuch is scheduled to headline a luncheon celebrating the 50th anniversary of conservative group The Fund for American Studies on September 28, days before the next SCOTUS term begins October 2. Steve Slattery, a spokesman for The Fund for American Studies, said Gorsuch had nothing to do with venue choice, which was made long before the group asked Gorsuch to speak."

Source:
CYBER COMMAND ELEVATED AT DOD
Administration Faces Exodus of Top Cybersecurity Officials
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration has lost a handful of individuals serving in top cybersecurity roles across the federal government in recent weeks, even as it has struggled to fill high-ranking IT positions. The developments present hurdles for the new administration and speak to the longstanding challenge the federal government faces in competing with the private sector for top tech talent." Among those resigning is Richard Staropoli, "a former U.S. Secret Service agent who served as chief information officer (CIO) of the Department of Homeland Security for just three months," and Dave DeVries, the CIO at OPM. Separately, the White House announced today that President Trump has directed that United States Cyber Command be elevated to the status of a Unified Combatant Command focused on cyberspace operations.

Source:
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login