In the Aftermath of a Post-Nuclear Senate, Everyone’s Dug in Deeper

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 21: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) talks with reporters after stepping off the Senate floor at the U.S. Capitol November 21, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Senate voted 52-48 to invoke the so-called 'nuclear option', voting to change Senate rules on the controversial filibuster for most presidential nominations with a simple majority vote.
National Journal
Michael Catalin and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin Elahe Izadi
Nov. 21, 2013, 3:24 p.m.

The sun had not set on the post-nuc­le­ar Sen­ate, when Demo­crats began look­ing for­ward to con­firm­ing a slate of White House nom­in­ees as Re­pub­lic­ans dished out dooms­day fore­casts on the fu­ture of the in­sti­tu­tion.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., in­voked the rules change — first dubbed the “nuc­le­ar op­tion” and later called the “Re­id Rule” — and began a pro­cess in which ex­ec­ut­ive and ju­di­cial nom­in­ees, though not Su­preme Court justices, could be con­firmed via a simple, 51-vote ma­jor­ity.

The up­per cham­ber is on track to con­firm Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett to the U.S. Court of Ap­peals-D.C. Cir­cuit after Thanks­giv­ing re­cess, and the White House has sub­mit­ted a slate of oth­er nom­in­ees to oth­er posts. But when it comes to budget deals and oth­er le­gis­la­tion — par­tic­u­larly bills that need 60 votes to pass — the rules change hasn’t done much to cre­ate a bi­par­tis­an at­mo­sphere.

“It puts a chill on the en­tire United States Sen­ate,” said Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz. “It puts a chill on everything that re­quires bi­par­tis­an­ship.”

Mc­Cain, who reached a deal to thwart a rules change back in the sum­mer, now says it’s “too late” to forge an agree­ment to go back. He had been work­ing for two weeks to avert what happened Thursday, in­clud­ing an hour-long meet­ing in Re­id’s of­fice Wed­nes­day night.

“I’ve reached [out] un­til my arm aches, OK?” Mc­Cain said. “They are gov­erned by these hard-over, new­er mem­bers of the Demo­crat­ic caucus who have nev­er been in the minor­ity, who are primar­ily driv­ing this is­sue and they suc­ceeded. And they will pay a very, very heavy price for it.”

And what could that price be? Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., isn’t lay­ing out a play-by-play on how Re­pub­lic­ans will bite back. “I don’t think this is a time to be talk­ing about re­pris­al. I think it is a time to be sad about what’s been done to the United States Sen­ate, the greatest de­lib­er­at­ive body in the world.”

Re­pub­lic­ans, like Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina, warned that ju­di­cial nom­in­ees would be­come more and more par­tis­an be­cause, “the party in power is go­ing to be pushed by base votes,” he said. “The polit­ic­al nature of who you pick changes be­cause you are not go­ing to have to ac­com­mod­ate any­body on the oth­er side.”

In­deed, the Sen­ate Demo­crats who were most vo­cal in sup­port of the rules change did in­clude a cadre of new­er mem­bers who haven’t served in the minor­ity. Their ar­gu­ments in fa­vor of the change took hold this week, par­tic­u­larly as some of their weary, more ex­per­i­enced col­leagues felt they had no oth­er op­tions.

“I feel like we’ve been forced in­to it, and I think it’s ter­ribly un­for­tu­nate,” Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., said. “You can’t de­cide you want to re­move judges from a cir­cuit without get­ting a law passed to re­duce the num­ber of judges on that cir­cuit. You don’t get to block nom­in­ees in or­der to ef­fect le­gis­lat­ive policy, and that’s what they’re try­ing to do.”

A num­ber of Demo­crats are thrilled that, as they put it, the fever has been broken and they can move on to con­firm judges that hadn’t been blocked be­cause of their qual­i­fic­a­tions, but be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted to Obama filling the court with his choices. “I’m not afraid of demo­cracy,” said re­tir­ing Sen. Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa.

“Not un­easy at all. Happy about it,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. “I’ve been sup­port­ive of it for a long time. It took us awhile to get the whole caucus there. I am thrilled to get the Sen­ate back to work.”

Re­pub­lic­ans have ar­gued that the rules change was a dis­trac­tion, de­signed to re­move the fo­cus on the prob­lems as­so­ci­ated with the rol­lout of Obama­care. Landrieu, who faces a tough reelec­tion fight back home, countered that the rules change had noth­ing to do with the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“It had to do with the fact that the Sen­ate has been at a dead stand­still and there are a hand­ful of sen­at­ors led by Ted Cruz, sup­por­ted by Mitch Mc­Con­nell, and flamed on by Dav­id Vit­ter, that think they own this floor and they don’t,” she said. “The Amer­ic­an people do and we’re go­ing to get back to their busi­ness.”

Re­id’s chan­ging of the rules ba­sic­ally de­livered on something many Re­pub­lic­ans say they’ve been ex­pect­ing. Very “mat­ter of fact,” was how Sen. Johnny Isak­son, R-Ga., put it. “This is something that every­body thought would come, they just didn’t know when.”

“We were all tired of be­ing threatened by it,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

Oth­er law­makers tried to find a way out. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, had din­ner Monday night with a group of sen­at­ors who con­vened dur­ing the shut­down, to come up with a short-term com­prom­ise.

“It was very short­sighted of the Demo­crats to force this. There was a group of us work­ing to try to come up with some sort of com­prom­ise and I think it’s un­for­tu­nate that we were not giv­en the time to try to come up with something that might have pro­duced a dif­fer­ent end­ing,” Collins said.

Demo­crats, par­tic­u­larly the more ap­pre­hens­ive ones, were acutely aware of how their votes on Thursday could come back to haunt them. “If you’ve been around awhile, I think you worry about everything — in­clud­ing the sun com­ing up — com­ing back to haunt you,” Mc­Caskill said. “There’s noth­ing I do that I don’t worry about.”

What We're Following See More »
SANS PROOF
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
1 days ago
UPDATE
NEW TRAVEL BAN COMING SOON
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
1 days ago
UPDATE
“WE’RE CHANGING IT”
Trump Rails On Obamacare
1 days ago
UPDATE

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."

FAKE NEWS
Trump Goes After The Media
1 days ago
UPDATE

Donald Trump lobbed his first attack at the “dishonest media” about a minute into his speech, saying that the media would not appropriately cover the standing ovation that he received. “We are fighting the fake news,” he said, before doubling down on his previous claim that the press is “the enemy of the people." However, he made a distinction, saying that he doesn't think all media is the enemy, just the "fake news."

FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login