In the Aftermath of a Post-Nuclear Senate, Everyone’s Dug in Deeper

None

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 21: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) talks with reporters after stepping off the Senate floor at the U.S. Capitol November 21, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Senate voted 52-48 to invoke the so-called 'nuclear option', voting to change Senate rules on the controversial filibuster for most presidential nominations with a simple majority vote.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi Michael Catalini
See more stories about...
Elahe Izadi Michael Catalini
Nov. 21, 2013, 3:24 p.m.

The sun had not set on the post-nuc­le­ar Sen­ate, when Demo­crats began look­ing for­ward to con­firm­ing a slate of White House nom­in­ees as Re­pub­lic­ans dished out dooms­day fore­casts on the fu­ture of the in­sti­tu­tion.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., in­voked the rules change — first dubbed the “nuc­le­ar op­tion” and later called the “Re­id Rule” — and began a pro­cess in which ex­ec­ut­ive and ju­di­cial nom­in­ees, though not Su­preme Court justices, could be con­firmed via a simple, 51-vote ma­jor­ity.

The up­per cham­ber is on track to con­firm Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett to the U.S. Court of Ap­peals-D.C. Cir­cuit after Thanks­giv­ing re­cess, and the White House has sub­mit­ted a slate of oth­er nom­in­ees to oth­er posts. But when it comes to budget deals and oth­er le­gis­la­tion — par­tic­u­larly bills that need 60 votes to pass — the rules change hasn’t done much to cre­ate a bi­par­tis­an at­mo­sphere.

“It puts a chill on the en­tire United States Sen­ate,” said Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz. “It puts a chill on everything that re­quires bi­par­tis­an­ship.”

Mc­Cain, who reached a deal to thwart a rules change back in the sum­mer, now says it’s “too late” to forge an agree­ment to go back. He had been work­ing for two weeks to avert what happened Thursday, in­clud­ing an hour-long meet­ing in Re­id’s of­fice Wed­nes­day night.

“I’ve reached [out] un­til my arm aches, OK?” Mc­Cain said. “They are gov­erned by these hard-over, new­er mem­bers of the Demo­crat­ic caucus who have nev­er been in the minor­ity, who are primar­ily driv­ing this is­sue and they suc­ceeded. And they will pay a very, very heavy price for it.”

And what could that price be? Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., isn’t lay­ing out a play-by-play on how Re­pub­lic­ans will bite back. “I don’t think this is a time to be talk­ing about re­pris­al. I think it is a time to be sad about what’s been done to the United States Sen­ate, the greatest de­lib­er­at­ive body in the world.”

Re­pub­lic­ans, like Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina, warned that ju­di­cial nom­in­ees would be­come more and more par­tis­an be­cause, “the party in power is go­ing to be pushed by base votes,” he said. “The polit­ic­al nature of who you pick changes be­cause you are not go­ing to have to ac­com­mod­ate any­body on the oth­er side.”

In­deed, the Sen­ate Demo­crats who were most vo­cal in sup­port of the rules change did in­clude a cadre of new­er mem­bers who haven’t served in the minor­ity. Their ar­gu­ments in fa­vor of the change took hold this week, par­tic­u­larly as some of their weary, more ex­per­i­enced col­leagues felt they had no oth­er op­tions.

“I feel like we’ve been forced in­to it, and I think it’s ter­ribly un­for­tu­nate,” Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., said. “You can’t de­cide you want to re­move judges from a cir­cuit without get­ting a law passed to re­duce the num­ber of judges on that cir­cuit. You don’t get to block nom­in­ees in or­der to ef­fect le­gis­lat­ive policy, and that’s what they’re try­ing to do.”

A num­ber of Demo­crats are thrilled that, as they put it, the fever has been broken and they can move on to con­firm judges that hadn’t been blocked be­cause of their qual­i­fic­a­tions, but be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted to Obama filling the court with his choices. “I’m not afraid of demo­cracy,” said re­tir­ing Sen. Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa.

“Not un­easy at all. Happy about it,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. “I’ve been sup­port­ive of it for a long time. It took us awhile to get the whole caucus there. I am thrilled to get the Sen­ate back to work.”

Re­pub­lic­ans have ar­gued that the rules change was a dis­trac­tion, de­signed to re­move the fo­cus on the prob­lems as­so­ci­ated with the rol­lout of Obama­care. Landrieu, who faces a tough reelec­tion fight back home, countered that the rules change had noth­ing to do with the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“It had to do with the fact that the Sen­ate has been at a dead stand­still and there are a hand­ful of sen­at­ors led by Ted Cruz, sup­por­ted by Mitch Mc­Con­nell, and flamed on by Dav­id Vit­ter, that think they own this floor and they don’t,” she said. “The Amer­ic­an people do and we’re go­ing to get back to their busi­ness.”

Re­id’s chan­ging of the rules ba­sic­ally de­livered on something many Re­pub­lic­ans say they’ve been ex­pect­ing. Very “mat­ter of fact,” was how Sen. Johnny Isak­son, R-Ga., put it. “This is something that every­body thought would come, they just didn’t know when.”

“We were all tired of be­ing threatened by it,” said Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

Oth­er law­makers tried to find a way out. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, had din­ner Monday night with a group of sen­at­ors who con­vened dur­ing the shut­down, to come up with a short-term com­prom­ise.

“It was very short­sighted of the Demo­crats to force this. There was a group of us work­ing to try to come up with some sort of com­prom­ise and I think it’s un­for­tu­nate that we were not giv­en the time to try to come up with something that might have pro­duced a dif­fer­ent end­ing,” Collins said.

Demo­crats, par­tic­u­larly the more ap­pre­hens­ive ones, were acutely aware of how their votes on Thursday could come back to haunt them. “If you’ve been around awhile, I think you worry about everything — in­clud­ing the sun com­ing up — com­ing back to haunt you,” Mc­Caskill said. “There’s noth­ing I do that I don’t worry about.”

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×