Americans feel confident that they can pay their monthly bills, even if they express doubt about their ability to plan and save for their financial futures.
That’s according to new results from an Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor Poll, which recently gauged American’s attitudes toward their personal finances five years after the global financial recession.
Ninety percent of those surveyed said they felt fine about covering day-to-day costs, an increase of 8 percent since April 2013. But Americans’ confidence level decreased when it came to their ability to pay medical bills for themselves and their family (just 71 percent said that this seemed “realistic”). Sixty-eight percent had faith in their ability to make mortgage payments, or pay off their debts, while just 58 percent felt like they were investing their money for their future.
The ability to make financial plans splits starkly among those with college degrees and those without them. Four in 10 Americans, without college educations, said they rarely had enough money left over each month after paying their bills. Only 19 percent of college grads found themselves in such a paycheck-to-paycheck existence.
To increase their ability to save money in the long run, the majority of Americans said that it was worth making sacrifices in their daily spending habits. They would make this trade-off, respondents said, even if it meant a lower quality of life.
Few Americans believed that any financial windfall would arrive in the form of an inheritance. Seventy-four percent of Americans never received this type of money from family members; 68 percent did not expect to, either.
Overall, the majority of Americans (53 percent) still believe the U.S. remains in the throes of a recession, a few years after the downturn technically ended. It’s a commentary on the fragile financial state that many Americans still feel like they find themselves in, especially when it comes to saving for retirement, college, or a rainy day fund.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."