Americans Feel Good About Paying Bills; Just Don’t Ask About Retirement

New polling shows that people do not feel like they’re saving enough money for the long term.

Money Roll
National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
Nancy Cook
Nov. 25, 2013, 5 a.m.

Amer­ic­ans feel con­fid­ent that they can pay their monthly bills, even if they ex­press doubt about their abil­ity to plan and save for their fin­an­cial fu­tures.

That’s ac­cord­ing to new res­ults from an All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll, which re­cently gauged Amer­ic­an’s at­ti­tudes to­ward their per­son­al fin­ances five years after the glob­al fin­an­cial re­ces­sion.

Ninety per­cent of those sur­veyed said they felt fine about cov­er­ing day-to-day costs, an in­crease of 8 per­cent since April 2013. But Amer­ic­ans’ con­fid­ence level de­creased when it came to their abil­ity to pay med­ic­al bills for them­selves and their fam­ily (just 71 per­cent said that this seemed “real­ist­ic”). Sixty-eight per­cent had faith in their abil­ity to make mort­gage pay­ments, or pay off their debts, while just 58 per­cent felt like they were in­vest­ing their money for their fu­ture.

The abil­ity to make fin­an­cial plans splits starkly among those with col­lege de­grees and those without them. Four in 10 Amer­ic­ans, without col­lege edu­ca­tions, said they rarely had enough money left over each month after pay­ing their bills. Only 19 per­cent of col­lege grads found them­selves in such a paycheck-to-paycheck ex­ist­ence.

To in­crease their abil­ity to save money in the long run, the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans said that it was worth mak­ing sac­ri­fices in their daily spend­ing habits. They would make this trade-off, re­spond­ents said, even if it meant a lower qual­ity of life.

Few Amer­ic­ans be­lieved that any fin­an­cial wind­fall would ar­rive in the form of an in­her­it­ance. Sev­enty-four per­cent of Amer­ic­ans nev­er re­ceived this type of money from fam­ily mem­bers; 68 per­cent did not ex­pect to, either.

Over­all, the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans (53 per­cent) still be­lieve the U.S. re­mains in the throes of a re­ces­sion, a few years after the down­turn tech­nic­ally ended. It’s a com­ment­ary on the fra­gile fin­an­cial state that many Amer­ic­ans still feel like they find them­selves in, es­pe­cially when it comes to sav­ing for re­tire­ment, col­lege, or a rainy day fund.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
18 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×