An Energy Bill Both Parties Can Love

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 25: U.S. Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) speaks during a news conference September 25, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The House leadership held the news conference to call on the Congress to pass a clean debt ceiling increase. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Nov. 22, 2013, 12:07 p.m.

While the pas­sage of a raft of GOP-backed en­ergy bills this month ap­peared to widen the di­vide between House Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans, a pair of law­makers has forged a genu­inely bi­par­tis­an plan to in­crease en­ergy ef­fi­ciency in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.

Reps. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Cory Gard­ner, R-Colo., in­tro­duced a bill Thursday to al­low fed­er­al agen­cies to ex­pand the use of util­ity en­ergy ser­vice con­tracts, which are agree­ments with util­it­ies spe­cify­ing “the amount of en­ergy sav­ings it will achieve through ret­ro­fits and oth­er meas­ures,” ac­cord­ing to a news re­lease about the bill. “The util­ity is then paid for its per­form­ance out of the sav­ings it achieves.”

The le­gis­la­tion would al­low agen­cies to enter in­to these per­form­ance con­tracts for up to 25 years, ac­cord­ing to Welch and Gard­ner.

“The bill would al­low private con­tract­ors to in­crease en­ergy ef­fi­ciency in fed­er­al agen­cies,” Gard­ner told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “The longer con­tract leads to great­er en­ergy sav­ings, and it’s a way to max­im­ize the sav­ings to the tax­pay­er.”

This isn’t the first time Welch and Gard­ner have col­lab­or­ated on an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency meas­ure. The pair un­veiled a sim­il­ar plan to pro­mote en­ergy sav­ings in fed­er­al build­ings last Ju­ly, and Welch is a co­spon­sor of a bill put for­ward with Rep. Dav­id McKin­ley, R-W.Va., that would serve as a com­pan­ion to a Sen­ate en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill in­tro­duced by Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Rob Port­man, R-Ohio.

The util­ity ser­vice-con­tract bill dropped this week also has a com­pan­ion meas­ure in­tro­duced by Sens. Bri­an Schatz, D-Hawaii; Lamar Al­ex­an­der, R-Tenn.; and Dan Coats, R-Ind.

So far none of the pro­pos­als has made it out of com­mit­tee. What’s dif­fer­ent this time around, con­gres­sion­al aides say, is that House lead­er­ship wants to see bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion pass, in part, as a show of unity fol­low­ing the di­vis­ive par­tis­an battles sur­round­ing the gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“All of us know that the shut­down and the con­flict polit­ics that came out of it have their lim­its,” Welch said. “If we find com­mon ground on something, that will be good for the in­sti­tu­tion and for both parties.”

Welch and Gard­ner say they have also been work­ing be­hind the scenes to build a broad con­sensus for en­ergy ef­fi­ciency, point­ing to a let­ter signed this month by 70 Demo­crats and 47 Re­pub­lic­ans in the House, along with Sens. Chris­toph­er Coons, D-Del., and John Booz­man, R-Ark. The let­ter to the White House, dated Nov. 4 and re­leased Wed­nes­day, calls on Pres­id­ent Obama to ex­tend a dir­ect­ive to in­crease en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency ef­forts in fed­er­al agen­cies.

Gard­ner said he has spoken with House Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy, R-Cal­if., about mov­ing ad­di­tion­al en­ergy bills to the floor next year, in­clud­ing en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency le­gis­la­tion.

When asked wheth­er he thought the le­gis­la­tion would gain trac­tion in the deeply di­vided lower cham­ber, Gard­ner com­men­ted: “I think it can. If you’re look­ing for a trail­blazer bill to show that you can cre­ate good policy with broad sup­port, this bill is the per­fect ex­ample.”

Welch agreed. “Con­gress has got to get things done, and the only way we’ll do that is by find­ing com­mon ground,” he said. “Is­sues in en­ergy are con­ten­tious but ef­fi­ciency isn’t. Every­one agrees we need to have this done, so right now what we’re do­ing is try­ing to smooth all the edges down and make sure that we do this in a way that works for both sides.”

What We're Following See More »
DEMOCRATS WILL INTRODUCE RESOLUTION ON FRIDAY
Pelosi Pushing Legislation to End National Emergency
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Speaker Nancy Pelosi is throwing her muscle behind a legislative effort to block President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration, the first formal step to counter Trump and squeeze Republicans on the border wall. Democrats will introduce legislation Friday to terminate the emergency proclamation and Pelosi is urging House colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support the resolution, according to a letter obtained by POLITICO on Wednesday."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
5 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
5 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
5 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login