"President Trump named John R. Bolton, a hard-line former American ambassador to the United Nations, as his third national security adviser on Thursday, continuing a shake-up that creates one of the most hawkish national security teams of any White House in recent history. Mr. Bolton will replace Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the battle-tested Army officer who was tapped last year to stabilize a turbulent foreign policy operation but who never developed a comfortable relationship with the president." Bolton was an outspoken advocate of military action during the George W. Bush administration, and has "called for action against Iran and North Korea."
Donald Trump’s polarizing presidency has provided few reasons for optimism about any aspect of American race relations.
From violence in Charlottesville to the repeal of the deferred-action program for young undocumented immigrants, from battles over voter-identification laws to a border wall, racially barbed conflict has been a defining feature of the Trump era—with the president appealing to white racial resentments more explicitly than any national political figure since George Wallace.
But demographic trends offer some guarded reasons for hope that the United States is living through peak years of discord over its growing racial and ethnic diversity—even if the temperature isn’t likely to lower very quickly. That sliver of good news is embedded in an otherwise sobering new study from PolicyLink and the Program for Environmental and Regional Equity (PERE) at the University of Southern California.
The two groups track the trajectory and implications of the twin demographic revolutions remaking American society. The country is simultaneously diversifying, especially among young people, and aging. While kids of color are expected to become a majority of the under-18 population by around 2020, nearly four-fifths of today’s senior population is white.
The contrast and conflict between these kaleidoscopically diverse younger generations and preponderantly white older ones—groups I’ve called the brown and the gray—has emerged as one of the central fault lines in American life. Hillary Clinton won overwhelming majorities among younger minority voters. Trump, meanwhile, carried over three-fifths of whites older than age 45, and they provided a majority of his votes.
The new study quantifies another implication of what the authors call the “racial generation gap,” a concept initially developed by demographer William Frey. Analyzing state spending trends, they found that since 1990 states and counties with the biggest gaps between mostly white seniors and mostly nonwhite kids “tend to spend less” on K-12 public education on a per capita basis. (PolicyLink and PERE have partnered with The Atlantic on similar data projects.)
Many of the states with the widest racial generation gaps, including Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, California, and Florida, spend the least per person on public education. Conversely, many states that are more racially homogeneous, from Vermont, Connecticut, and New Hampshire to West Virginia, Wyoming, and North Dakota, spend more.
As the authors note, the resistance by so many older whites to invest in future generations is extraordinarily shortsighted. One of the central dynamics of 21st-century America is that an increasingly nonwhite workforce will be paying the taxes that fund Social Security and Medicare for a growing and mostly white retiree population. As I’ve written before, there is no financial security for the gray without economic opportunity for the brown.
Trump has implicitly mobilized his coalition, centered on older and working-class whites, around the opposite argument: that diverse younger generations can rise only at their expense. Not only does his agenda on crime and immigration target white anxieties, he also tilts starkly toward the gray in his budget proposals. He would preserve Social Security and Medicare, which benefit mostly white seniors, while slashing domestic-discretionary programs that invest in the productivity of the highly diverse rising generations.
Even so, PERE director Manuel Pastor finds reason for optimism. Since the 1990s, the racial generation gap rapidly widened as the minority share of the youth population exploded, from 34 percent in 1995 to 48 percent in 2013. That share has grown much more slowly among seniors, rising only from 16 percent to 21 percent in that same period. In future years, the Census Bureau projects that minorities will increase their share of the youth population somewhat more slowly and steadily age into a growing portion of the elderly. The result is that the racial generation gap likely peaked around 2013, and will decline, albeit slowly, in years ahead.
One possible political consequence is that as whites recede to less than half the population, even more of them will respond to Trump-like appeals to racial nationalism. But Pastor notes that California, a state at the forward edge of demographic change, experienced its greatest racial tension—with initiatives to ban affirmative action, bilingual education, and services for undocumented immigrants—precisely as its racial generation gap peaked in the mid-1990s. As the gap has diminished, so has the state’s racial conflict.
As Pastor points out, the racial generation gap won’t close nearly as fast nationally as it did in California, which means that waiting for demographic change alone to defuse tension “could be a long and grinding process.” That raises the stakes in finding new ways to build bridges across generations. “The task,” he said, “is to speed up the process of intergenerational understanding and interdependence.”
What We're Following See More »
"When a Russian news agency reached out to George Papadopoulos to request an interview shortly before the 2016 election," deputy communications director Bryan Lanza encouraged him to respond. "You should do it," Lanza wrote in a September 2016 email, "emphasizing the benefits of a U.S. 'partnership with Russia.'" The Trump campaign has "sought to paint the 30-year old energy consultant as a low level volunteer" in the campaign, but recently disclosed emails show that Papadopoulos had contact with "senior campaign figures" in the Trump campaign, "such as chief executive Stephen K. Bannon and adviser Michael Flynn," who encouraged him to "broker ties between Trump and top foreign officials."