The State Department office tasked with the time-devouring chore of sifting through thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails needs reinforcements.
In a court filing Tuesday, State said its Freedom of Information Act office is “strained to the limit” amid the “enormous undertaking” of vetting Clinton’s messages for public release and simultaneously dealing with a huge influx of new requests over the past year.
The filing is part of a lawsuit by Vice News reporter Jason Leopold, whose case has begun prying loose Clinton’s messages but is also seeking emails of several of her former top aides.
According to Tuesday’s filing, State had nearly 11,000 FOIA requests pending at the end of fiscal year 2014, and since then over 16,500 new requests have poured in.
The ongoing review and release of roughly 30,000 messages that Clinton turned over to the department, which State is releasing in monthly batches under a judge’s order, are consuming a “significant portion” of State’s FOIA processing resources, the filing states.
But help is on the way.
Reuters reported Tuesday night that State hopes to move about 50 workers from elsewhere in the department into the FOIA office to deal with the backlog in public-records requests.
“The extra staff will not work on the monthly, court-ordered release of Clinton emails, which are being handled by about 20 permanent and 30 part-time workers, officials said. The new staff will fill in for those workers and may also handle other Clinton FOIA requests,” Reuters reports.
The news service obtained a Sept. 2 State Department notice to employees seeking people with skills that include the ability to decide what information may be declassified and released.
A State Department official, confirming the plan, told National Journal that State’s FOIA caseload has increased more than 300 percent since 2008.
“In an effort to meet these increasing demands, the department is actively adding additional staff to our FOIA office team. These additional staff members will work on a range of different FOIA requests. We believe this is a wise and prudent step to promote transparency and responsiveness,” the official said.
State also announced Tuesday that Secretary of State John Kerry has named Janice Jacobs, a former senior department official, to the new job of “transparency coordinator,” where she’ll work on “improving our systems for responding to Freedom of Information Act and congressional requests faster and more efficiently.”
However, State found itself on the defensive over the choice of Jacobs when reports surfaced that she donated $2,700 to Clinton’s presidential campaign in June.
Jacobs, asked about the donation by the Associated Press, noted she was retired at the time and did not expect to rejoin the department.
But Republicans remain skeptical that she is the right person for the job.
“Putting a maxed out Clinton donor in charge of overseeing the process of releasing her emails doesn’t just give the appearance of a conflict of interest, it is one,” said Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short.
What We're Following See More »
"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."
"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."
Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."