Joe Lieberman: Iran Agreement Is a ‘Mistake’

Joseph Leiberman during a ceremony at the at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services December 19, 2012 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Matt Berman
Nov. 25, 2013, 9:23 a.m.

Joe Lieber­man may not be in the Sen­ate any­more, but the former Demo­crat­ic vice pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee turned polit­ic­al in­de­pend­ent still has thoughts on the U.S.-Ir­an re­la­tion­ship. And he is not a big fan of the agree­ment an­nounced this week­end.

“Don’t treat your en­emies like friends un­til they prove that they’ve changed,” Lieber­man told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Monday. “Ir­an is an en­emy.” He called the in­ter­im agree­ment a “mis­take” for the U.S. and its al­lies.

The former sen­at­or from Con­necti­c­ut knocked Ir­an for hav­ing a “ter­rible re­cord of not keep­ing agree­ments and, frankly, of ly­ing,” and said he would have held out for a com­pre­hens­ive agree­ment.

“This prob­ably is a his­tor­ic agree­ment, but we won’t know un­til six months or bey­ond,” he said. Lieber­man con­tin­ued:

If it sets up the situ­ation for a com­pre­hens­ive agree­ment, which I doubt, then it’ll be his­tor­ic­ally pos­it­ive. If as I fear it cre­ate a new nor­mal where people de­cide, “Ir­an’s open for busi­ness again,” and yet they’ve giv­en up none of their nuc­le­ar in­fra­struc­ture really and are just as ready to break out and build a nuc­le­ar weapon as they were yes­ter­day, then this will be seen as a his­tor­ic­ally cata­stroph­ic agree­ment which really made the world much more in­sec­ure.

So, per Lieber­man, the six-month deal on Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram is likely no good, more likely cata­stroph­ic. Pretty lousy news for Lieber­man’s old col­league, John Kerry.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.