Wednesday Q+A With Terry McAuliffe

The political operative turned governor talks economics, redistricting, and the presidency.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, photographed in National Journal's offices.
Chet Susslin
July 11, 2017, 8 p.m.

Vir­gin­ia Gov. Terry McAul­iffe’s first and fi­nal term ends next year. As chair of the Na­tion­al Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation and a former Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee head, he is vo­cal on na­tion­al polit­ics and policy. McAul­iffe talked with Zach C. Co­hen at Na­tion­al Journ­al’s of­fices about bal­an­cing fisc­al and so­cial policy, the “cor­ros­ive” ef­fect of ger­ry­man­der­ing, and the “fun” he’s had as gov­ernor. Tran­script ed­ited for length.

As you wrap up, what do you con­sider to be your biggest leg­acy over the last four years?

Clearly eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment. Un­em­ploy­ment rate has gone from 5.4 to 3.8, the low­est in nine years. We’re now the No. 1 state in Amer­ica for cy­ber­se­cur­ity. My chal­lenge now is we have so many high-pay­ing jobs that we’re not filling.

I’ve prob­ably been the most pro­gress­ive gov­ernor in Vir­gin­ia his­tory. I was one of the first statewide in the South to come out for mar­riage equal­ity. I told the [Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation] they can go jump off a cliff. I told wo­men I’d be a brick wall to pro­tect their rights. I’ve re­stored more felon rights than any gov­ernor.

You’ve ve­toed more le­gis­la­tion than any oth­er Vir­gin­ia gov­ernor. Is there any­thing you re­gret not be­ing able to do?

I ve­toed 120 bills. I was nev­er over­rid­den once. Sev­enty-eight per­cent of my le­gis­la­tion got passed with a very Re­pub­lic­an le­gis­lature, and to be hon­est with you, we work very closely to­geth­er on eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment. I got everything I wanted. A spec­tac­u­lar fail­ure—not for want of try­ing—has been [not passing] Medi­caid ex­pan­sion.

As chair of the NGA, you’ve talked to oth­er gov­ernors about fed­er­al health care policy. Do they see their role in this de­bate dif­fer­ently from oth­er fed­er­al de­bates?

Oh, yeah. You’ve seen such a co­ali­tion of Demo­crat and Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors come to­geth­er. Those 31 ex­pan­sion states and D.C.—it’s a lot of money for them. And then us non-ex­pan­sion states—we’re per­petu­ally go­ing to be locked out of this fund­ing go­ing for­ward.

Would you run for a second term if you could?

Listen, I’m fine with four years. But of course if there was an op­por­tun­ity to run again, of course you would. I’ve prob­ably had more fun than any­one’s ever en­titled to have. I’m sure you’ve seen the Twit­ter; I was out on the moon bounce the oth­er day, ra­cing kids. I jumped out of a plane at 10,000 feet in­to a Wounded War­ri­or con­cert. I’m the first gov­ernor to go up in an un­manned drone; I flew it with a laptop. My se­cur­ity team is at the point where [they say], “Well, let him do what he wants. We can’t stop him if we wanted to.” Three-hun­dred new winer­ies, 206 craft brew­er­ies—I’m try­ing to do my best to vis­it them all.

Demo­crats last month nom­in­ated Lt. Gov. Ral­ph Northam to re­place you. What do you an­ti­cip­ate his gov­ernor­ship would look like?

He was my lieu­ten­ant gov­ernor, [and] God knows I kept get­ting sued—thank good­ness I had At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Mark Her­ring—but we were a team, the three of us. And these ac­com­plish­ments are not Terry McAul­iffe’s ac­com­plish­ments. They’re our ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ac­com­plish­ments. That’s what Ral­ph’s go­ing to run on, a con­tinu­ation of those policies.

[GOP nom­in­ee] Ed [Gillespie] has been a good friend. You’d prob­ably kill him by writ­ing that.

You served at the same time as na­tion­al party chairs.

Ed and I did a lot of TV to­geth­er. We come from the same place. Polit­ics isn’t per­son­al. You can dis­agree; it doesn’t mean you’re a bad per­son. And un­for­tu­nately what’s happened in Amer­ic­an polit­ics today is every­body takes it so mean-spir­ited.

What are you go­ing to be do­ing after your term?

The tax­pay­ers are pay­ing me, so I’m really fo­cused on the next six months. And then I’m really lean­ing in on the [Na­tion­al Demo­crat­ic Re­dis­trict­ing Com­mit­tee]. I view this ger­ry­man­der­ing as so cor­ros­ive. These lines are drawn such that nobody will work with each oth­er any­more. And if I had my druth­ers, I’d have an in­de­pend­ent, non­par­tis­an com­mis­sion in all 50 states.

You haven’t ruled out run­ning for pres­id­ent in 2020. Do you think there is an ap­pet­ite for some­body with your re­cord?

I get asked this a lot. I have no idea what I’m do­ing in the fu­ture. I love be­ing gov­ernor. It’s the one job—hon­est—I’ve al­ways wanted.

Take me out of it, be­cause this is not something I’m think­ing about: We need a stand­ard-bear­er of our party who fo­cuses ob­sess­ively on eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment and job growth, and con­nects that to a so­cially pro­gress­ive agenda. But talk­ing about a so­cially pro­gress­ive agenda without eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment to me is a mean­ing­less con­ver­sa­tion.

What We're Following See More »
Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
1 days ago
Biden Running
1 days ago
Mueller Made 14 Criminal Referrals
2 days ago
The Report Is Here
2 days ago
Nadler Asks Mueller to Testify By May 23
2 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.