It’s a dark time for President Obama. His approval ratings are sliding as confidence wanes in his competence and the government’s ability to do anything right. His allies squirm, his critics circle and lick their chops in anticipation of a kill. National newspapers wonder if this is “Obama’s Katrina,” even as George W. Bush gets better marks from the public than his successor. The president’s entire agenda seems in peril, thanks to his administration’s inability to tackle a thorny technical problem. “It’s a lot like Custer,” a former Democratic senator remarks. “He underestimated the number of Indians on the other side of the hill and paid the ultimate price.”
I’m talking, of course, of the 2010 BP oil spill. Or perhaps Hurricane Sandy. Or maybe the IRS controversy — disasters that seemed sure to doom the Obama administration, until they suddenly didn’t. And while the HealthCare.Gov fiasco is worse and more dangerous politically for the White House than probably any other controversy — this was an unforced error on his signature legislative agenda item, not a disaster to be cleaned up — it’s worth remembering in the cyclone of a news cycle that it’s easy to lose perspective and assume the current dynamic was and always will be.
Obama looks doomed today, but remember that just a few weeks ago, it was Republicans whose obituaries were being written all over cable news and newspaper op-ed pages thanks to the party’s brinkmanship on the government shutdown. A few weeks before that, it was Obama, again, whose legacy was on the line thanks to his botched handling of Syria. Many wondered if the shutdown could cost the GOP control of the House in 2014. Now, just a month later, those losses are gone and its Democrats who apparently risk losing control of the Senate.
The question on every body’s mind is: Can Obama recover?
It’s the same question that was put to Larry King’s panel in May of 2008 after Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s explosive sermons surfaced (Obama did recover from that). And again in August 2009 when the Los Angeles Times asked, “Can Obama recover on health care?” as reform stymied in Congress (he did, and so did health care reform). And again after Obama criticized the arrest of Henry Lewis Gates, when the AP asked, “Can Obama recover after Gates incident?” (He did.)
It was asked again in January 2010 by editorial boards from Orlando to Buffalo after Republican Scott Brown won a special election in Massachusetts (he did, and so did Obamacare). And again January 2011 after Democrats got shellacked in the 2010 midterm. When Sean Hannity asked his panel in August, 2011, “Can Obama recover?” from a sinking Dow and other bad economic news, Fox News analyst Peter Johnson, Jr. replied, “No, but we need America to recover.” Penny Nance of Concerned Women for America added, “I don’t think so. I think he’s done.”
And then it was asked again in June of 2012, after the president had a “horrible, no-good’ week.” And then in October again after Obama’s poor performance in his first debate against Mitt Romney. And then again in September of this year after the president faced strong congressional opposition to his planned intervention in Syria.
We could play this game with the GOP too. After the 2008 election, pundits wondered if the GOP could ever bounce back. And anyone who wondered how the GOP was possibly going to get out of the mess it created with the shutdown in October overestimated Obama’s ability to hold onto a lead.
As Ross Douthat has noted, Obamacare has been buried three times. First, there was Scott Brown’s win, when it “seemed finished, doomed, doornail-dead.” Then there was the Supreme Court challenge, when a “train wreck” of oral arguments led the New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin and many others to declare that the law “looks like it’s going to be struck down.” That was the pervasive belief until the court upheld the law four months later (though CNN and Fox initially — and erroneously — announced that the Court had killed the individual mandate). And then the third burial would be today, when some say the law won’t live to see Election Day 2014 (it will).
“If you’re feeling some déjÃ vu, there’s a reason,” Brendan Nyhan, a Dartmouth political scientist and media critic wrote in his column in the Columbia Journalism Review last week. “Journalists are falling victim to the same extrapolation fallacy that pervades so much political coverage. In these sorts of stories, reporters identify a current trend and spin out a story in which it continues to implausible extremes.”
But in reality, of course, any shifts in public opinion around specific events are transitory and limited. Obama recovered from his disastrous Denver debate and went on to win the 2012 election; the GOP recovered from its loss in 2008 and went on to win a historic victory in 2010.
Without doubt, HealthCare.Gov‘s dangers to Obama, Democrats, and the entire liberal agenda are real. But just as real a possibility is that the website gets fixed sooner or later, builds confidence and users, and we all move on to something else by New Year’s Day.
What We're Following See More »
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."
At an open hearing of the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA chief John Brennan said he saw information on Trump-Russia contacts that were worth a further look. "Having been involved in many counterintelligence cases in the past, I know what the Russians do. They try to suborn individuals," Brennan said. "And they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, whether wittingly or unwittingly. And I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons, and so therefore by the time I left office ... I had unresolved questions in my mind."
"President Trump is moving rapidly toward assembling outside counsel to help him navigate the investigations into his campaign and Russian interference in last year’s election, and in recent days he and his advisers have privately courted several prominent attorneys to join the effort. By Monday, a list of finalists for the legal team had emerged, according to four people briefed on the discussions."
"President Trump asked two of the nation’s top intelligence officials in March to help him push back against an FBI investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and the Russian government, according to current and former officials. Trump made separate appeals to the director of national intelligence, Daniel Coats, and to Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, urging them to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election."