The Democrat Who Thinks Democrats Are Doing This Wrong

Rep. Tim Walz of Minnesota, a Trump-district Democrat, is countering the national party in his moderate bid to become governor of a purpling state.

Rep. Tim Walz
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Add to Briefcase
Zach C. Cohen
July 6, 2017, 8 p.m.

Demo­crat­ic Rep. Tim Walz was happy to show off a ma­jor Re­pub­lic­an group’s foot­age of his re­cent town hall.

The video, pro­moted by the Re­pub­lic­an Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation, showed the can­did­ate for Min­nesota gov­ernor be­moan­ing the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee’s in­struc­tion to ig­nore the Af­ford­able Care Act’s “warts.”

“I’m retweet­ing the RGA’s at­tack on me,” Walz said last week, “be­cause there are areas of the ACA that are fail­ing my con­stitu­ents,” even as he stressed that “a vast num­ber of people be­ne­fit­ted” from the law.

Walz holds the unique po­s­i­tion of be­ing the only Rust Belt Demo­crat in the House who is run­ning statewide in 2018, mak­ing him­self a test case as his party seeks to climb back from the minor­ity while hold­ing onto right­ward-trend­ing rur­al dis­tricts like Walz’s.

Walz, a former Army Na­tion­al Guards­man, also pumps the brakes on Demo­crats’ oth­er ma­jor con­gres­sion­al push: the in­vest­ig­a­tion of Rus­si­an med­dling in the 2016 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. While Walz wants Con­gress to in­vest­ig­ate the “threat,” he says the is­sue “doesn’t boil up as the first thing [voters] talk about,” even if he takes “a little flak” from the Left for say­ing so.

“I think it would be prudent for us to quit try­ing to find the middle of the polit­ics and find the middle of their lives,” Walz said.

Mean­while, Re­pub­lic­ans are en­ter­ing their fifth straight cycle of at­tack­ing the na­tion­al health care law even as a GOP-con­trolled Con­gress struggles to pass a re­place­ment plan.

RGA spokes­man Jon Thompson in an email ac­cused Walz of be­ing “disin­genu­ous” in his hand­ling of the is­sue, high­light­ing Demo­crat­ic-Farm­er-Labor Gov. Mark Dayton’s Oc­to­ber re­mark that “the Af­ford­able Care Act is no longer af­ford­able to in­creas­ing num­bers of people.”

“Con­gress­man Walz voted for Obama­care, Obama­care is im­plod­ing, and no mat­ter how hard he tries to walk it back, Min­nesota voters won’t for­get that he has been a strong sup­port­er of Pres­id­ent Obama’s failed health law,” Thompson said.

The con­gress­man faces a crowded field of primary op­pon­ents to re­place Dayton, who isn’t seek­ing reelec­tion. Walz, a former geo­graphy teach­er, will need to win rur­al votes—in­clud­ing in his Rochester- and Mankato-based seat—to com­ple­ment pro­gress­ive turnout in the Twin Cit­ies.

Walz’s elect­or­al path is not unique. Dayton, a former sen­at­or, won the 2010 gubernat­ori­al primary by do­ing well in the Iron Range and rur­al Min­nesota. He went on to nar­rowly de­feat now-Rep. Tom Em­mer.

“I think any­one who’s run­ning in the primary is go­ing to try to mir­ror that path,” said Justin Per­pich, who led an un­suc­cess­ful ef­fort to draft rur­al Demo­crat­ic Rep. Rick No­lan in­to the race.

Walz’s statewide bid has left open a vul­ner­able con­gres­sion­al seat. Demo­crats don’t have a clear front-run­ner in Walz’s dis­trict, which voted for Don­ald Trump by nearly 15 points in Novem­ber. Re­pub­lic­an Jim Haged­orn is already mak­ing a third bid for the seat. He came with­in 2,500 votes of un­seat­ing Walz in 2016, des­pite the in­cum­bent’s fun­drais­ing ad­vant­age.

“After 12 years of a lib­er­al Demo­crat on most of the is­sues, I think they’re ready for a change back to the Re­pub­lic­an Party,” Haged­orn said. “We’re very op­tim­ist­ic, but we’re go­ing to work hard. We take noth­ing for gran­ted.”

Re­pub­lic­ans have not won the gov­ernor’s man­sion—or any statewide of­fice in Min­nesota—since 2006. But Trump came with­in 2 points of snap­ping the state’s his­tor­ic run of back­ing Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates, and the le­gis­lature is con­trolled by Re­pub­lic­ans.

Walz views the race as a high-stakes battle for Demo­crats in Min­nesota, jok­ing that his slo­gan should be “Walz or Wis­con­sin?” in ref­er­ence to con­ser­vat­ive policies en­acted in the neigh­bor­ing Badger State un­der Gov. Scott Walk­er.

Walz will still have to win over Demo­crats in Min­neapol­is and St. Paul, edging out loc­al com­pet­it­ors like St. Paul May­or Chris Cole­man as well as cur­rent Twin-Cit­ies-area state Reps. Paul This­sen and Erin Murphy, who both served in le­gis­lat­ive lead­er­ship. State Aud­it­or Re­becca Otto is also run­ning, and strategists are watch­ing state At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Lori Swan­son’s likely en­trance as well.

“It is ab­so­lutely crit­ic­al for a Demo­crat to do ex­tremely well in the Twin Cit­ies,” Cole­man said in an in­ter­view in May, not­ing that Hil­lary Clin­ton car­ried the state by do­ing well there in Novem­ber. “But as Demo­crats,” he ad­ded, “we need to do much bet­ter in great­er Min­nesota.”

Walz also runs the risk of ali­en­at­ing pro­gress­ive act­iv­ists, who have an out­sized in­flu­ence in Min­nesota. The state party will en­dorse a can­did­ate at its an­nu­al con­ven­tion two months be­fore the Au­gust primary. Walz, like the rest of the field, has not ruled out run­ning in the primary against the party-en­dorsed can­did­ate.

“It’s a per­il­ous place to be to cri­ti­cize Obama­care and the im­pact of it, even though it’s fa­cing chal­lenges,” said one Demo­crat­ic con­sult­ant with ex­per­i­ence in the state. “DFLers in the state are ob­vi­ously very pro­tect­ive of Obama’s leg­acy, and they see [Obama­care] as such a huge part of that.”

For his part, DFL Chair Ken Mar­tin wor­ries about “snatch­ing de­feat from the jaws of vic­tory,” giv­en the “late, crowded primary” and “the land­scape.”

“Tim’s a great can­did­ate; we have a lot of good can­did­ates in the field,” Mar­tin said. “But we could cer­tainly lose this race.”

Cor­rec­tion: This story ori­gin­ally stated Re­pub­lic­ans have not held a statewide of­fice in Min­nesota since 2006. That is the year they last won a statewide elec­tion there.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.