Why Assange Evades U.S. Charges While Manning Sits in Jail

Prosecuting Julian Assange would mean implicating the journalists who worked with him.

Julian Assange
National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
Nov. 26, 2013, 6:12 a.m.

From a U.S. leg­al stand­point, Ju­li­an As­sange made a smart move in 2010 — he de­cided to share his bounty of 500,000 leaked cables with tra­di­tion­al news out­lets like The Guard­i­an and The New York Times. Today, The Wash­ing­ton Post re­ports that As­sange is un­likely to face U.S. charges for his role in fa­cil­it­at­ing the greatest in­tel­li­gence leak in Amer­ic­an his­tory. Why? Be­cause do­ing so would im­plic­ate the journ­al­ists who worked with As­sange. The Post re­ports:

Justice of­fi­cials said they looked hard at As­sange but real­ized that they have what they de­scribed as a “New York Times prob­lem.” If the Justice De­part­ment in­dicted As­sange, it would also have to pro­sec­ute The New York Times and oth­er news or­gan­iz­a­tions and writers who pub­lished clas­si­fied ma­ter­i­al, in­clud­ing The Wash­ing­ton Post and Bri­tain’s Guard­i­an news­pa­per, ac­cord­ing to the of­fi­cials, who spoke on the con­di­tion of an­onym­ity to dis­cuss in­tern­al de­lib­er­a­tions.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has not been soft on leak­ers, and it has been cri­ti­cized for be­ing too ag­gress­ive with the press. But the gov­ern­ment makes a care­ful dis­tinc­tion here: Chelsea Man­ning and Ed­ward Snowden are clear crim­in­als. They leaked clas­si­fied doc­u­ments they swore not to re­lease. They did so be­cause of a sense of act­iv­ism. As­sange fa­cilil­ated, in Man­ning’s case, the leaks. But yet As­sange will not be charged with aid­ing the crime be­cause he was the mes­sen­ger, des­pite the fact that his in­tent to leak the doc­u­ments is also based in the same vein of protest or act­iv­ism as the oth­ers.

Bill Keller, the former Times ex­ec­ut­ive ed­it­or, wrote that As­sange was an “elu­sive, ma­nip­u­lat­ive, and volat­ile” part­ner to work with. His 2011 re­count of the epis­ode makes As­sange out to be more of an act­iv­ist seek­ing a mega­phone than a journ­al­ist who wants to un­cov­er the truth. For in­stance,  “He was angry that we de­clined to link our on­line cov­er­age of the War Logs to the WikiLeaks web­site,” Keller wrote, “a de­cision we made be­cause we feared — rightly, as it turned out — that its trove would con­tain the names of low-level in­form­ants and make them Taliban tar­gets.”

At sur­face level, one can ar­gue that As­sange is no dif­fer­ent from Man­ning and Snowden. But as The Post re­ports, “Justice of­fi­cials said [As­sange] would al­most cer­tainly not be pro­sec­uted for re­ceiv­ing clas­si­fied ma­ter­i­al from Man­ning.”

Which is to say, if you don’t want to be in­dicted for leak­ing in­form­a­tion, don’t steal the in­form­a­tion your­self.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
16 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×