The Wish Lists That Could Doom Obamacare Repeal

Several Republicans are against or wavering on the GOP health bill, and each one has a different set of demands.

Sen. Susan Collins speaks amid a crush of reporters Thursday after Republicans released their long-awaited bill to scuttle much of the Affordable Care Act.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Alex Rogers
Add to Briefcase
Alex Rogers
June 26, 2017, 8:41 p.m.

The hunt is on.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell is find­ing it in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult to cor­ral 50 out of 52 Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans and pass a bill re­form­ing much of the Af­ford­able Care Act, im­per­il­ing one of the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion’s top pri­or­it­ies in Con­gress and the core prom­ise Re­pub­lic­ans have made to their voters for years.

Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers has tar­geted a vote to­wards the end of the week, but four of their rank-and-file sen­at­ors—Ron John­son of Wis­con­sin, Susan Collins of Maine, Dean Heller of Nevada and Rand Paul of Ken­tucky—in­dic­ated Monday that they won’t sup­port a pro­ced­ur­al vote, po­ten­tially deal­ing a crit­ic­al blow to the bill. A few more Re­pub­lic­ans are waver­ing—each for slightly dif­fer­ent reas­ons—mak­ing Mc­Con­nell’s task es­pe­cially tricky.

The in­tra­party cri­ti­cism comes after the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice an­nounced Monday that the bill, known as the Bet­ter Care Re­con­cili­ation Act, would in­crease the num­ber of un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans by 22 mil­lion, and cut over $500 bil­lion in rev­en­ues primar­ily through cut­ting taxes on the af­flu­ent and more than $770 bil­lion in Medi­caid spend­ing re­duc­tions over the next 10 years. While some Re­pub­lic­ans poin­ted out the pos­it­ive—the bill would ul­ti­mately lower premi­ums by 20 per­cent and de­crease the de­fi­cit by $331 bil­lion—oth­ers re­cog­nized the polit­ic­al per­il for vot­ing in fa­vor of the bill. Heller, per­haps the most vul­ner­able Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or up for reelec­tion in 2018, came out against the bill last week.

“If you’re on the fence—you were look­ing at this as a polit­ic­al vote—this CBO score didn’t help you,” said Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham on Monday.

The GOP lead­er­ship now must act quickly to push through the vote be­fore mem­bers go home for the Ju­ly 4 hol­i­day. Here are eight sen­at­ors to watch out for:

Susan Collins of Maine

Per­haps the Re­pub­lic­ans’ most mod­er­ate sen­at­or, Collins has pri­or­it­ized cov­er­age dur­ing the en­tire health care de­bate this year. On Monday night, she tweeted that she would not vote to ad­vance the bill be­cause “ac­cess to health­care in rur­al areas [is] threatened,” not­ing the deep cuts to Medi­caid. The bill also denies fund­ing for Planned Par­ent­hood for a year, an idea she re­cently said on ABC “makes ab­so­lutely no sense.”

“I want to work w/ my GOP & Dem col­leagues to fix the flaws in ACA,” tweeted Collins on Monday night. “CBO ana­lys­is shows Sen­ate bill won’t do it.”

Ron John­son of Wis­con­sin

Last year, many Re­pub­lic­ans coun­ted John­son out long be­fore he won on Elec­tion Day. He doesn’t owe his vic­tory to the Sen­ate GOP lead­er­ship, and has cri­ti­cized its pro­cess as se­cret­ive and rushed. On Monday night, he said, “I have a hard time be­liev­ing I will have enough in­form­a­tion” to sup­port a pro­ced­ur­al vote on the bill. His oth­er cri­ti­cisms lie in the bill not be­ing con­ser­vat­ive enough; “Like Obama­care, it re­lies too heav­ily on gov­ern­ment spend­ing,” he wrote in a New York Times op-ed.

Rand Paul of Ken­tucky

Paul has al­ways been viewed as one of the most dif­fi­cult votes to get. The pres­id­ent has re­cently talked to Paul, but Sen­ate lead­er­ship has not, ac­cord­ing to Paul and his staff. When Trump and Paul spoke, the sen­at­or “re­it­er­ated his is­sues with the cur­rent bill—how it isn’t ser­i­ous re­peal, and what things he will need to be con­vinced it can lower costs for Amer­ic­ans,” ac­cord­ing to Paul spokes­man Ser­gio Gor.

“We prom­ised re­peal; we didn’t prom­ise that we were keep­ing Obama­care,” Paul told re­port­ers on Monday. “But if we don’t fun­da­ment­ally fix the mar­ket­place we’re go­ing to own health care.”

“I think there’s ac­tu­ally more blame to be at­tached to not do­ing a real thor­ough fix­ing than there is to do­ing noth­ing,” he ad­ded.

Ted Cruz of Texas

The man who led the 2013 gov­ern­ment shut­down over de­fund­ing Obama­care says he wants to get to yes, even though he has been in­volved for months with the work­ing group that came up with the bill. But so far, Cruz has with­held his sup­port, say­ing that premi­ums need to de­crease not only over time, but in the next couple of years, too. He also has con­cerns over pro­cess, say­ing on Monday night that “re­forms to lower premi­ums need to be re­flec­ted in the base bill” rather than through the amend­ment pro­cess.

“CBO pro­jec­ted the next two years would go up 30 per­cent,” Cruz told re­port­ers on Monday. “That’s a dis­aster. That’s the dis­aster that’s already hap­pen­ing with Obama­care. This cur­rent draft doesn’t solve that prob­lem.”

Rob Port­man of Ohio

Port­man hails from one of the 31 states that ex­pan­ded the Medi­caid pro­gram un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, which has helped his con­stitu­ents ob­tain ac­cess to treat­ment through Medi­caid. Port­man and Sen. Shel­ley Moore Capito of West Vir­gin­ia have re­ques­ted $45 bil­lion over 10 years to re­spond to the opioid crisis. The cur­rent bill only has $2 bil­lion, so look for Port­man and Capito to push for more fund­ing.

Dean Heller of Nevada

Heller is per­haps the most vul­ner­able Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or up for reelec­tion in 2018. Nevada Gov. Bri­an San­dov­al, who is pop­u­lar in the state, has de­fen­ded the Medi­caid ex­pan­sion as a reas­on for the state’s de­clin­ing un­in­sured rate. In a press con­fer­ence last week with San­dov­al, Heller said that he would not sup­port the bill as writ­ten, say­ing it’s a “lie” that it would lower premi­ums, and that in fact it would take in­sur­ance away from “hun­dreds of thou­sands” of Nevadans.

Mike Lee of Utah

Lee, a staunch con­ser­vat­ive, would not vote for the cur­rent bill, out­lining in a state­ment last week his grand price: an “opt-out” pro­vi­sion for states and/or in­di­vidu­als that would greatly change the con­tours of the bill.

“Far short of ‘re­peal,’ the Sen­ate bill keeps the Demo­crats’ broken sys­tem in­tact, just with less spend­ing on the poor to pay for cor­por­ate bail­outs and tax cuts,” he wrote.

Lisa Murkowski of Alaska

On Monday night, Murkowski said on CNN that she doesn’t have “enough data” to vote for the bill, echo­ing the con­cerns of John­son and oth­ers. Murkowski, who has built a brand on her in­de­pend­ence from Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship, wants great­er ac­cess and re­duced costs, but re­peal­ing the Medi­caid ex­pan­sion would cur­tail cov­er­age in her state. Alaska has some of the highest health care costs in the coun­try, and early ana­lyses of the Sen­ate bill have found that it would in­crease premi­ums, par­tic­u­larly for older people, over Obama­care.

Erin Durkin contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
USED IN LAS VEGAS SHOOTING SPREE
Trump Says He Signed Order Recommending Ban on Bump Stocks
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
PRIORITIZES ELECTION HACKING
Sessions Forms Cyber Task Force
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
ESCORT SERVICES USED TO WOO RECRUITS
NCAA Strips Louisville of Basketball Championship
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

The N.C.A.A. "upheld penalties against Louisville’s men’s basketball program related to a sex scandal involving players, recruits and prostitutes, and ordered the university to forfeit dozens of victories, including its 2013 national championship." Andre McGee, a former Louisville player serving on the basketball staff in 2013, solicited an escort service that he used to entertain recruits in an on-campus dormitory. Louisville officials called the decision "wrong." It is the first time the N.C.A.A. has stripped a program of the national championship.

Source:
HEARING THIS AFTERNOON
Mueller Indicts Attorney for Making False Statements About Gates
16 hours ago
THE LATEST
THE QUESTION
What’s the Value of Suspicious Transactions by Paul Manafort that Mueller Is Investigating?
16 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About $40 million, "a much larger sum than was cited in his October indictment on money laundering charges."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login