The Revolution Will Not Be GoldieBlox

If this feminist toy campaign is progress, it’s an ode to incrementalism.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
lucia graves
Nov. 28, 2013, midnight

For a minute it looked like the re­volu­tion had ar­rived. Just two years after Peggy Oren­stein spelled out the prob­lems with Amer­ica’s prin­cess cul­ture in Cinder­ella Ate My Daugh­ter, a toy com­pany with a mis­sion of “dis­rupt­ing the pink aisle” stormed the In­ter­net.

Gol­dieBlox put to­geth­er a hit video of three little girls, who, dis­gus­ted by the pink-prin­cess cul­ture in Amer­ica, take their con­ven­tion­ally girly toys and turn them in­to a Rube Gold­berg ma­chine, rock­ing out while a re­vamped ver­sion of the Beast­ie Boys song “Girls” plays. The ad dom­in­ated Up­worthy, Slate called it “stu­pendously awe­some,” and it was giv­en glow­ing re­views on the front page of The New York Times’ busi­ness sec­tion. (The video, if you haven’t seen it, is here.)

Turns out, the product doesn’t quite live up to the hype. “Why are the toys all still pink and pas­tel col­ors?” asked one Face­book com­menter. “As a mom of two daugh­ters, not sure I buy it”¦. Stick­ing with lego, planes, trains & auto­mo­biles,” tweeted an­oth­er. “It’s a hol­i­day pur­chase scam, and I am dis­ap­poin­ted at every mom who shared that video with me!”

There’s the fact that the products go heavy on pink and purple; the fact that Gol­die, the girl who “loves to build,” is thin and blond and and con­ven­tion­ally pretty; and the fact that Gol­dieBlox is still, at the end of the day, selling prin­cesses. Gol­dieBlox and the Parade Float, for in­stance, tells the story of Gol­die’s friends Ruby and Katinka who com­pete in a prin­cess pa­geant with the hopes of rid­ing in the town parade. When Katinka loses the crown, Gol­die and Ruby team up to build her a parade float as well. Not ex­actly “dis­rupt­ing the pink aisle”…

Nar­rat­ives are a trade­mark of Gol­dieBlox toys, which CEO Debbie Ster­ling says are de­signed to “in­spire the next gen­er­a­tion of fe­male en­gin­eers” by ap­peal­ing to girls’ heightened verbal skills. “Girls love stor­ies and char­ac­ters, where­as all the con­struc­tion toys are build­ing for the sake of build­ing,” Ster­ling told the Los Angeles Times. Ster­ling her­self trained as an en­gin­eer at Stan­ford, where she was frus­trated to see how few wo­men pur­sued the field at the gradu­ate level. That’s something she wanted to change; and to reach wo­men early, she set her sights on the toy aisle. (She was not able to ac­com­mod­ate an in­ter­view re­quest from Na­tion­al Journ­al un­til Decem­ber.)

A post writ­ten by De­borah Siegel, pro­poses that Gol­dieBlox is prac­ti­cing “Tro­jan fem­in­ism.” Sure the toys are con­ven­tion­ally girly, she writes, but the un­der­ly­ing concept — teach­ing girls to think cre­at­ively and build things — is what’s really im­port­ant. It’s a val­id ar­gu­ment, al­though that didn’t save pink Le­g­os from be­ing widely panned (they were a hit com­mer­cially).

“If put­ting it in a pink box can get girls in­ter­ested in spa­cial re­la­tion­ships, that’s great,” said Sean McGowen, a toy ana­lyst with Need­ham & Co. It’s prob­ably not the an­swer to get­ting wo­men in sci­ence, but it does sell toys, and there are cer­tainly less-edu­ca­tion­al ones.

Re­becca Hains, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or of com­mu­nic­a­tions at Salem State Uni­versity, sug­ges­ted that Gol­dieBlox may just be do­ing what’s re­quired to enter the main­stream mar­ket. “I think it’s a chick­en and egg thing,” she said. “Re­tail­ers aren’t go­ing to give shelf space to an un­proven com­pany, and so the com­pany has to prove it­self. And to prove it­self, from a re­tail per­spect­ive, they need to ap­peal to the largest pos­sible audi­ence.”

That de­sire has Gol­dieBlox talk­ing out both sides of its mouth: an em­power­ing mes­sage for par­ents and the me­dia, glit­tery junk for the kids. But at­tract a wide audi­ence it has. The toy line was re­cently picked up by Toys “R” Us and its new ad, re­leased last week — just be­fore Black Fri­day, nat­ur­ally — has garnered more than 8 mil­lion views and is cur­rently com­pet­ing for an ad spot in the Su­per Bowl.

But even the ad has at­trac­ted cri­ti­cism. The Hol­ly­wood Re­port­er re­vealed that Gol­dieBlox is pree­mpt­ively su­ing the Beast­ie Boys to dis­cour­age any claim of copy­right in­fringe­ment. (The Beast­ie Boys are un­der­stand­ably vexed that the toy com­pany has used their mu­sic without per­mis­sion in ser­vice of its bot­tom line.) Oth­ers have com­plained that com­pany hired a mostly male crew to cre­ate the com­plex con­trap­tion fea­tured in the video.

De­cep­tion in mar­ket­ing is noth­ing par­tic­u­larly new. We know, for in­stance, that the Ford Fu­sion can­not fly (though Ford some­what hil­ari­ously has a dis­claim­er for that). The idea that girls can build a cool con­trap­tion out of their own toys, however, is not ex­actly an im­possible scen­ario. “I really would have been much more im­pressed if I thought that thing was set up by a bunch of 8-year-old girls,” said McGow­an.

Gol­dieBlox won’t bring the re­volu­tion overnight, but it might help build it one pink (sigh) block at a time.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×