College Used to Be a Path to Success. Now It Divides Us.

Today’s educational system does more to stratify than to dissolve economic advantage.

CAMBRIDGE, MA - MAY 30: General atmosphere at 2013 Harvard University 362nd Commencement Exercises at Harvard University on May 30, 2013 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. 
Getty Images
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ronald Brownstein
Dec. 10, 2013, 4:15 a.m.

Rare is the in­ter­na­tion­al com­par­is­on in which the United States trails not only the big in­dus­tri­al­ized na­tions — Great Bri­tain, say — and the per­en­ni­al Nor­d­ic list-top­pers such as Fin­land but also lags such mid­dling eco­nom­ies as Italy, Tur­key, and Mex­ico.

But here’s one: The like­li­hood that chil­dren will ac­quire more edu­ca­tion than their par­ents is now lower in the United States than in all of those coun­tries. In fact, the odds of chil­dren ex­ceed­ing their par­ents’ edu­ca­tion­al level is “lower in the United States than in any oth­er ad­vanced na­tion,” An­thony Carne­vale and Jeff Strohl of Geor­getown Uni­versity’s Cen­ter on Edu­ca­tion and the Work­force con­cluded in “Sep­ar­ate and Un­equal,” their re­cent land­mark re­port on Amer­ic­an high­er edu­ca­tion.

In the U.S. today, they found, three-fourths of chil­dren whose par­ents ob­tained a Ph.D. or pro­fes­sion­al de­gree earn at least a four-year col­lege dip­loma. So do nearly two-thirds of young people whose par­ents earned a mas­ter’s de­gree and half of those whose par­ents ob­tained a bach­el­or’s de­gree. By com­par­is­on, only about a fourth of chil­dren whose par­ents at­ten­ded but didn’t fin­ish col­lege earned a bach­el­or’s de­gree them­selves. The num­bers fall to about one in eight for kids whose par­ents ad­vanced no fur­ther than a high school dip­loma.

Drill to bed­rock in our col­lect­ive con­vic­tions and you will find the be­lief that Amer­ica is a land of op­por­tun­ity, in which every­one can rise as far as their tal­ents will take them. In the latest Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll, con­duc­ted in Oc­to­ber, two-thirds of adults said chil­dren of all back­grounds have an ad­equate chance to suc­ceed in the United States. Ma­jor­it­ies not only of whites but also of Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans, His­pan­ics, and Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans agreed. Their faith is a source of the en­ergy and tenacity that routinely drives Amer­ic­ans to climb far bey­ond their mod­est be­gin­nings.

And yet over­all, the cross-gen­er­a­tion­al trends in edu­ca­tion­al achieve­ment mock our col­lect­ive self-im­age. In the Amer­ic­an ima­gin­a­tion, edu­ca­tion op­er­ates as our great so­cial es­cal­at­or, lift­ing any­one with enough de­term­in­a­tion to with­in reach of the Amer­ic­an Dream. But the trends Carne­vale and Strohl de­scribe show that today’s edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem does more to strat­i­fy than to dis­solve eco­nom­ic ad­vant­age.

Edu­ca­tion­al in­sti­tu­tions may not be mo­tiv­ated by ra­cial pre­ju­dice or “class bi­as,” Carne­vale noted at a re­cent for­um sponsored by Na­tion­al Journ­al. But func­tion­ally, he said, the U.S. has de­veloped a “dual sys­tem,” par­tic­u­larly in high­er edu­ca­tion, “where even these col­or-blind, class-blind in­sti­tu­tions are very re­li­ably [gen­er­at­ing] in­tergen­er­a­tion­al re­pro­duc­tion of race and class priv­ilege.”

This dual sys­tem starts young. Six dec­ades after the Su­preme Court banned school se­greg­a­tion, sep­ar­a­tion by class and race re­mains en­dem­ic in Amer­ica’s ele­ment­ary and sec­ond­ary schools. The South­ern Edu­ca­tion Found­a­tion re­cently found, in an­oth­er com­pel­ling study, that 48 per­cent of all pub­lic-school stu­dents in kinder­garten through high school now qual­i­fy for re­duced or free school lunches, which are provided to fam­il­ies earn­ing 185 per­cent or less of the fed­er­al poverty level. Those fam­il­ies are heav­ily con­cen­trated. Al­most three-fourths of young Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans and more than two-thirds of young His­pan­ics at­tend schools in which a ma­jor­ity of stu­dents qual­i­fy as low-in­come. That’s true for only about a third of Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans and just three in 10 white stu­dents.

The same track­ing con­tin­ues onto the col­lege quad. One of the bright spots for Amer­ic­an edu­ca­tion is that more Afric­an-Amer­ic­an and His­pan­ic youths are com­plet­ing high school and start­ing col­lege; as Carne­vale and Strohl note, minor­it­ies’ rep­res­ent­a­tion among first-year col­lege stu­dents jumped from 27 per­cent in 1995 to 37 per­cent in 2009. But over that peri­od, they found, about two-thirds of the new Afric­an-Amer­ic­an stu­dents and al­most three-fourths of His­pan­ics were channeled in­to com­munity col­leges and the least-se­lect­ive four-year in­sti­tu­tions. Mean­while, more than four-fifths of new white stu­dents flowed in­to the na­tion’s 468 most-se­lect­ive schools, where three-fourths of the stu­dents were white — vir­tu­ally un­changed from two dec­ades ago.

This is cru­cial. Those elite schools spend at least twice as much per stu­dent as the less-se­lect­ive in­sti­tu­tions and pro­duce far bet­ter out­comes in gradu­ation rates, post­gradu­ate de­grees, and life­time earn­ings. They mint the adults most likely to raise chil­dren who will someday at­tend these schools them­selves.

As Carne­vale notes, the di­ver­gent out­comes for chil­dren from com­fort­able and poor fam­il­ies are rooted in a “very com­plex set of mu­tu­ally re­in­for­cing factors” that start with their par­ents’ edu­ca­tion and in­come levels. Re­vers­ing those power­ful dy­nam­ics isn’t easy — es­pe­cially when pub­lic budgets are tight. But the Next Amer­ica will be a tense and tur­bu­lent place if it ac­cepts a col­lapsing lad­der of mo­bil­ity that ap­por­tions op­por­tun­ity mainly to young people with the great foresight to be born in­to it.

What We're Following See More »
PLANS TO CURB ITS POWER
Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
2 days ago
BREAKING
WOULD HAVE REPLACED FLYNN
Harward Turns Down NSC Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."

Source:
REVERSES OBAMA RULE
House Votes to Let States Block Planned Parenthood Funds
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House passed a resolution Thursday re-opening the door for states to block Planned Parenthood from receiving some federal funds. The measure, which passed 230-188, would reverse a last-minute rule from the Obama administration that said conservative states can't block the women's health and abortion provider from receiving family planning dollars under the Title X program."

Source:
FORMER PROSECUTOR
Alexander Acosta to Get Nod for Labor
3 days ago
THE LATEST
12:30 PRESS CONFERENCE
New Labor Secretary Announcement Coming
3 days ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login