In the Womb, Assuring a Future

Even before there’s a child to educate, nurses in a Texas program visit low-income, first-time mothers during their pregnancy, helping them become “super-great moms” and giving their kids a very early edge in school.

National Journal
Sophie Quinton
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Quinton
Dec. 6, 2013, midnight

Ger­ie Perez has a 15-year-old cli­ent who’s ex­pect­ing her first child. As the nurse su­per­visor for a Nurse-Fam­ily Part­ner­ship agency in South Texas, Perez over­sees a group of nurses who vis­it low-in­come, first-time moth­ers twice a month dur­ing their preg­nancy, weekly for the six weeks after they give birth, then at least monthly un­til the child turns 2. “Just with that little bit of sup­port, it really lifts them up, and they are su­per-great moms,” Perez says. 

The Nurse-Fam­ily Part­ner­ship pro­gram, act­ive in 43 states, ad­dresses dis­par­it­ies in health and edu­ca­tion be­fore chil­dren ar­rive in preschool. It has suc­ceeded in im­prov­ing the health of moth­ers and ba­bies and also in help­ing moth­ers achieve fin­an­cial self-suf­fi­ciency. “We start par­ent­ing edu­ca­tion be­fore the baby’s born,” says Nancy Bo­tiller, chief op­er­at­ing of­ficer at the non­profit’s Den­ver headquar­ters.

Wo­men who en­roll in the pro­gram are more likely to carry their ba­bies to term. In Texas, where 54 per­cent of moth­ers the or­gan­iz­a­tion served in 2012 were His­pan­ic and 26 per­cent were Afric­an-Amer­ic­an, only 10 per­cent of the ba­bies were born pre­ma­turely, and just 9 per­cent were un­der­weight.

Na­tion­ally, chil­dren whose moth­ers en­roll in a Nurse-Fam­ily Part­ner­ship are 67 per­cent less likely to dis­play be­ha­vi­or­al and in­tel­lec­tu­al prob­lems at age 6. These in­ter­ven­tions have also halved the re­por­ted in­cid­ents of child ab­use and neg­lect.

Moth­ers join vol­un­tar­ily, at no cost, be­fore their 28th week of preg­nancy. Most are un­mar­ried. Na­tion­ally, their av­er­age age is about 20. Twenty-sev­en per­cent de­scribe them­selves as Afric­an-Amer­ic­an, 31 per­cent as Lat­ina, and 42 per­cent as white.

Nurses cov­er a range of top­ics with ex­pect­ant moth­ers, from pren­at­al nu­tri­tion to breast- feed­ing and deal­ing with a stress­ful home. They may help moth­ers save money on hous­ing or es­cape do­mest­ic vi­ol­ence. Moth­ers are taught how to re­spond to their ba­bies to cre­ate a strong bond, how to man­age in­fant tan­trums, and how to read and talk to their chil­dren.

Nurses use a tech­nique called mo­tiv­a­tion­al in­ter­view­ing. Rather than just telling a moth­er she ought to change a be­ha­vi­or, nurses will ask ques­tions, listen, and provide in­form­a­tion un­til cli­ents re­cog­nize the changes they must make. Mo­tiv­a­tion­al in­ter­view­ing also helps moth­ers set goals — to re­frain from smoking ci­gar­ettes be­fore the next nurse’s vis­it, say. Even if the moth­er doesn’t meet the goal, the nurse will con­grat­u­late her for mak­ing pro­gress and will help her brain­storm ways to meet the goal the fol­low­ing month. This pos­it­ive re­in­force­ment works, Perez says.

The na­tion­al or­gan­iz­a­tion has its roots in the 1970s, when Dav­id Olds, a pro­fess­or of pe­di­at­rics at the Uni­versity of Col­or­ado, star­ted a series of ran­dom­ized con­trolled tri­als to see how nurses’ vis­its could bring about healthy births. In the 1990s, pub­lic-health de­part­ments, hos­pit­als, and non­profit or­gan­iz­a­tions began rep­lic­at­ing the mod­el in their com­munit­ies. The Nurse-Fam­ily Part­ner­ship Na­tion­al Ser­vice Of­fice, es­tab­lished as a na­tion­al non­profit in 2003, has served 182,000 fam­il­ies.

The pro­gram typ­ic­ally costs $4,500 per fam­ily per year, fin­anced mainly by state and fed­er­al gov­ern­ments, but of­ten with private money as well. A 2005 study by Rand found that these ser­vices save between $1.26 and $5.70 in gov­ern­ment out­lays for every dol­lar spent, be­cause fam­il­ies are less likely to re­quire so­cial ser­vices.

COR­REC­TION: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­stated Dav­id Olds’s cre­den­tials. He is a pro­fess­or of pe­di­at­rics and holds a doc­tor­ate.

What We're Following See More »
FISHING EXPEDITION
Some Members Seek to Wrap Up Russia Investigations by Year’s End
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."

Source:
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
1 days ago
THE LATEST
Doesn’t Express Confidence in Marino
Trump to Declare Opioid Emergency Next Week
2 days ago
THE LATEST

After initially promising it in August, "President Trump said Monday that he will declare a national emergency next week to address the opioid epidemic." When asked, he also "declined to express confidence in Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), his nominee for drug czar, in the wake of revelations that the lawmaker helped steer legislation making it harder to act against giant drug companies."

Source:
IN LIGHT OF 60 MINUTES REVELATIONS
Manchin Asks Trump to Drop Marino’s Nomination for Drug Czar
2 days ago
THE LATEST
WOULD OVERTURN MARINO LEGISLATION ON DRUG DISTRIBUTORS
McCaskill Will Introduce Bill in Response to “60 Minutes” Scoop
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login