Best Time(s) to Help a Kid Succeed

A timely intervention can help a disadvantaged youngster find economic success as an adult. Stepping in early, scholars say, is cheaper and more effective.

Ms. Arzola's class: A year inpreschool prepares children to learn.  
National Journal
Janell Ross
Add to Briefcase
Janell Ross
Dec. 6, 2013, 2 a.m.

SAN ANT­O­NIO — Early last month, Mari­cella Perez thought she had all the pieces to­geth­er. Her es­says were done. The let­ters of re­com­mend­a­tion, re­ques­ted and com­plete. Her 99.7 grade-point av­er­age, and her track re­cord of co­ordin­at­ing stu­dent blood drives, rais­ing money for can­cer re­search, and serving as Theodore Roosevelt High School’s stu­dent-coun­cil pres­id­ent were de­scribed in de­tail. Perez’s ap­plic­a­tion for the Uni­versity of Texas (Aus­tin), her dream school, was done.

One Sat­urday af­ter­noon, however, sit­ting on her liv­ing-room couch, the pieces of her ap­plic­a­tion spread across the cof­fee table, the 18-year-old spot­ted a prob­lem: The ap­plic­a­tion cost $90 to file. “Hon­estly, I filled out the whole thing “¦ and then kind of sat on it,” she says. “I thought my mom was go­ing to kill me when it came time to put $90 in the mail.”

In Perez’s fam­ily, money is tight and ex­per­i­ence with col­lege ap­plic­a­tions is lim­ited. Her moth­er, the sole sup­port for Mari­cella and two young­er sib­lings, works as a med­ic­al as­sist­ant and at­tends night classes to be­come a li­censed vo­ca­tion­al nurse. Perez’s aunt, the only per­son in the ex­ten­ded fam­ily who has gradu­ated from col­lege, earned a de­gree from an on­line uni­versity last year.

Dur­ing the next two weeks, Perez grew so anxious that a high school guid­ance coun­selor no­ticed and pulled her in­to his of­fice. Perez, with her ster­ling re­cord, wasn’t even sure she would be able to ap­ply. The coun­selor in­tro­duced Perez to a nov­el concept: a fee waiver for low-in­come stu­dents.

Perez’s guid­ance coun­selor may have changed her life — a re­mind­er that an in­ter­ven­tion at the right mo­ment can have huge pay­offs that en­dure. In­deed, there are mul­tiple points dur­ing the life of a dis­ad­vant­aged child when a timely in­ter­ven­tion can help hugely. But in an era of slow eco­nom­ic growth and tight budgets, the re­sources aren’t avail­able to help every child at every crit­ic­al point. This raises a ques­tion: Which of these in­ter­ven­tions prom­ise the most bang for the buck?

Con­sider the choices. The first point of lever­age ar­rives be­fore birth: An ex­pect­ant moth­er’s men­tal and phys­ic­al health can help avoid a pre­ma­ture de­liv­ery, thereby im­prov­ing the child’s chances of learn­ing later. Then, ex­pand­ing ac­cess to high-qual­ity pre­kinder­garten pro­grams can in­crease a child’s odds of en­ter­ing school with es­sen­tial skills, ready to learn more. Once they’re in school, ex­tend­ing the amount of time chil­dren spend in the classroom has been shown to boost stu­dents who’ve fallen be­hind. Later come the col­lege conun­drums — help­ing dis­ad­vant­aged stu­dents get in­to col­lege and then com­plete a use­ful de­gree.

In­ter­ven­ing isn’t al­ways as simple or in­ex­pens­ive as meet­ing with a guid­ance coun­selor. As schol­ars grapple with the costs and be­ne­fits of in­ter­ven­ing at cru­cial times, poli­cy­makers around the coun­try have star­ted to weigh the ad­vant­ages and polit­ic­al risks of these com­pet­ing — and worthy — ob­ject­ives. Any de­bate that touches on poverty, preg­nancy, or how to edu­cate Amer­ica’s chil­dren is bound to raise ideo­lo­gic­al hackles.

In San Ant­o­nio, as in Wash­ing­ton, the res­ult of such a cal­cu­lus has pro­duced a push for great­er ac­cess to preschool. “We know a lot about the re­wards of provid­ing high-qual­ity early-child­hood edu­ca­tion,” said Cecil­ia Muñoz, dir­ect­or of Pres­id­ent Obama’s do­mest­ic policy staff. “The re­turn on in­vest­ment is huge.”

But things aren’t so simple. “We’ve looked at the num­bers,” said Isa­bel Sawhill, co­dir­ect­or of the Cen­ter on Chil­dren and Fam­il­ies at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. “Early is al­ways bet­ter. It’s of­ten cheap­er.” Still, she urges cau­tion. “There is no one pro­gram, one in­vest­ment. The ma­gic bul­let does not ex­ist.”


The fate of Mari­cella Perez, and of oth­ers like her, mat­ters not only to them but to every­one else. The no­tion that the United States can main­tain its glob­al eco­nom­ic edge by re­ly­ing on a shrink­ing share of re­l­at­ively af­flu­ent whites — who at­tend good schools with good teach­ers and ample re­sources, pre­kinder­garten through col­lege — amounts to a na­tion­al form of ma­gic­al think­ing. But dis­ad­vant­aged youths of every race and eth­ni­city find it hard to suc­ceed in an eco­nomy that in­creas­ingly re­quires more than a high school dip­loma to sur­vive in a shaky middle class.

Young Amer­ic­ans of col­or will soon dom­in­ate the na­tion’s work­force. Black and Latino stu­dents, nearly half of them from low-in­come house­holds, are already two-fifths of the pub­lic-school pop­u­la­tion. By 2038, fed­er­al pro­gnost­ic­at­ors say, ra­cial and eth­nic minor­it­ies will make up a ma­jor­ity of the coun­try’s work­force — and of the en­tire pop­u­la­tion by 2043. Lati­nos alone are pro­jec­ted to ac­count for 38 mil­lion new mem­bers of the labor force by 2050 — about 80 per­cent of its growth.

Few if any places in the United States are work­ing harder than San Ant­o­nio to pre­pare minor­ity youths to join an edu­cated work­force. The city pretty much has to.

“San Ant­o­nio is really at the van­guard of the way in which the demo­graphy of the United States is chan­ging,” said Char Miller, the au­thor of a book on San Ant­o­nio who was a long­time his­tory pro­fess­or at Trin­ity Col­lege here. “We have a minor­ity ma­jor­ity. Their edu­ca­tion­al fate, their health, their eco­nom­ic and so­cial op­por­tun­it­ies, are really go­ing to re­define what it means to be an Amer­ic­an — who we are and what people un­der­stand about us as a coun­try.”

Not long ago, San Ant­o­nio was known mostly for the Alamo. Now, as a city of 1.3 mil­lion, the sev­enth-most-pop­u­lous in the na­tion, more than 63 per­cent of res­id­ents are Latino, and 19 per­cent are poor.

Ju­li­an Castro has staked his may­or­alty — and his rising na­tion­al pro­file — on his am­bi­tions to help young San Ant­o­nians from de­prived back­grounds move in­to the eco­nom­ic main­stream. He has the street cred. The second-term may­or and his identic­al twin, Rep. Joa­quin Castro, D-Texas, were born to a poor single moth­er and — sup­por­ted by fam­ily and good teach­ers — wound up gradu­at­ing from Stan­ford Uni­versity and Har­vard Law School.

“I just want to make sure every oth­er young per­son has the op­por­tun­it­ies that I had,” the may­or said in an in­ter­view, dash­ing from a City Coun­cil meet­ing to a com­mem­or­a­tion of John F. Kennedy at a nearby Air Force base. “What we are do­ing is, we are try­ing to build a brain­power com­munity, mean­ing a very well-edu­cated mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion that is ready, will­ing, and able to take on jobs for the 21st cen­tury. You can’t get there without in­vest­ing in those that we know need the most help.”

San Ant­o­nio is pur­su­ing a full spec­trum of in­ter­ven­tions, ran­ging from dis­patch­ing med­ic­al spe­cial­ists and so­cial work­ers to ex­pect­ant moth­ers at high risk for pre­ma­ture de­liv­ery, to help­ing high school seni­ors fill out col­lege fin­an­cial-aid forms. The center­piece of Castro’s cam­paign was last year’s ref­er­en­dum on his pro­pos­al to raise the city sales tax by one-eighth of a cent to bring qual­ity pre­kinder­garten classes with­in every­one’s reach. Backed by loc­al busi­ness lead­ers, Castro ar­gued that too few 4-year-olds at­ten­ded pre-K to as­sure the city’s eco­nom­ic fu­ture. Des­pite op­pos­i­tion from the city’s af­flu­ent pre­cincts, 53.6 per­cent of voters agreed.

By 2020, San Ant­o­nio hopes — “needs,” Castro says — to raise the pro­por­tion of third-graders able to read at an ad­vanced level from the cur­rent 18 per­cent to 80 per­cent. Some pro­gress is ap­par­ent. The pro­por­tion of chil­dren who gradu­ate from high school, at 86 per­cent, has already ex­ceeded the city’s goal for 2020. But the pro­por­tion of third-graders who can read at grade level has shrunk (al­beit on a more rig­or­ous state test) to 73 per­cent.

“It’s a jour­ney,” Castro said.


On a week­day in early Novem­ber, at San Ant­o­nio’s Uni­versity Hos­pit­al, nurses in blue scrubs slipped around the neonat­al in­tens­ive-care unit. Nearly all of the 43 tiny res­id­ents were Latino ba­bies who had been born too soon. Some of the most crit­ic­ally ill lay in cut­ting-edge in­cub­at­ors that re­cre­ate the tem­per­at­ure and hu­mid­ity of the womb. In the new­est sec­tion of the unit, dim lights, the sound-sup­press­ing rub­ber floors, even the bed­side re­clin­ing chairs for par­ents have all been de­signed to min­im­ize the phys­ic­al and neur­o­lo­gic­al stressors that can cause preem­ies to lose, rather than gain, much-needed weight.

“We provide a truly es­sen­tial ser­vice for chil­dren in San Ant­o­nio — and, really, all over South Texas — every day,” said Rachel Rivas, the hos­pit­al’s dir­ect­or of new­born ser­vices. “But there is no ques­tion that it would be bet­ter “¦ if few­er chil­dren needed this kind of care.” 

She’s right. A grow­ing body of re­search shows a strong con­nec­tion between the so­cial con­di­tions in which chil­dren are con­ceived and brought to term and how well they will learn. Moth­ers who are poor dur­ing their preg­nan­cies are more likely to suf­fer from chron­ic stress, a bio­lo­gic­ally de­tect­able con­di­tion, ac­cord­ing to Eliza­beth Cor­win, dean of re­search at Emory Uni­versity’s School of Nurs­ing. The same is also true, she said, of middle-class black wo­men and second- and later-gen­er­a­tion Lat­i­nas. They face so­cial and eco­nom­ic dis­crim­in­a­tion that cre­ates physiolo­gic­al con­di­tions akin to the struggles of the poor. A re­cent study by Cor­win and col­leagues, mon­it­or­ing more than 100 moth­ers-to-be dur­ing their third tri­mester, found that chron­ic stress was as­so­ci­ated with poor reg­u­la­tion of in­flam­ma­tion, a risk factor for pre­ma­ture birth.

This, in turn, can have long-term ef­fects on a child’s edu­ca­tion. Mi­chael Kramer, an epi­demi­olo­gist at Emory’s School of Pub­lic Health, ex­amined the birth and school re­cords of thou­sands of Geor­gi­ans born between 1998 and 2003. When these chil­dren took state aca­dem­ic-as­sess­ment tests in first grade, those born pre­ma­turely were more likely to fail. The more pre­ma­ture the birth, the worse the child per­formed. Only 13 per­cent of the ba­bies born on time or less than three weeks early fell short on the first-grade test, com­pared with a third of the chil­dren born 13 to 20 weeks pre­ma­turely.

“What we found ex­plains some, but by no means all, of the aca­dem­ic achieve­ment gap,” Kramer said. “There are real dif­fer­ences we can make in edu­ca­tion by in­vest­ing in what hap­pens long be­fore chil­dren reach school.”

Last year, a ninth of Amer­ic­an chil­dren were born be­fore 37 weeks’ gest­a­tion, the highest rate in the in­dus­tri­al­ized world, ac­cord­ing to Ed­ward Mc­Cabe, med­ic­al dir­ect­or at the March of Dimes. That in­cluded nearly 17 per­cent of Afric­an-Amer­ic­an ba­bies, nearly 12 per­cent of Lati­nos, and 10.5 per­cent of whites.

At least one state with a siz­able pres­ence of minor­it­ies has made strides in re­du­cing pre­ma­ture births. Cali­for­nia, where 38 per­cent of the popu­lace is Latino and nearly 7 per­cent is black, has been in­vest­ing in ex­pand­ing health care cov­er­age for wo­men of child-bear­ing age and in help­ing them stop smoking. The state re­duced its rate of pre­ma­ture births from 10.9 per­cent in 2007 to 9.6 per­cent in 2012. The rate in Texas, which has re­jec­ted the Af­ford­able Care Act’s ex­pan­sion of Medi­caid ser­vices for the poor, stands at 12.4 per­cent.


Just after 7 a.m., on the north side of San Ant­o­nio, chil­dren barely big­ger than their back- packs hurry in­to the Pre-K 4 SA cen­ter. It’s un­season­ably chilly this fall morn­ing, and the preschool is sur­roun­ded by live oaks that fil­ter the sun. But that isn’t the only reas­on for the sense of ur­gency, as the chil­dren, par­ents, teach­ers, and ad­min­is­trat­ors make their way in.

San Ant­o­nio is in the first year of a city­wide ex­per­i­ment in all-day preschool. The pro­gram, which voters agreed to fund a year ago, re­serves most of its slots for stu­dents who are poor, don’t speak Eng­lish at home, or face oth­er dis­ad­vant­ages. The city’s first two Pre-K 4 SA cen­ters serve 660 stu­dents this year; two more schools are to open in 2014. With­in eight years, the sys­tem is ex­pec­ted to reach about 20,000 stu­dents — only a fifth, however, of the chil­dren un­der 5 who cur­rently live in San Ant­o­nio.

Even the law­makers in this small-gov­ern­ment state have joined in. For dec­ades, the Texas Le­gis­lature has fin­anced half-day pre-K for chil­dren who are poor, home­less, de­fi­cient in Eng­lish, in foster care, or (since 2005) have a par­ent on act­ive mil­it­ary duty. Still, few­er than three-fifths of the eli­gible chil­dren in San Ant­o­nio are en­rolled. Na­tion­wide, about 70 per­cent of 4-year-olds went to preschool in 2012, ac­cord­ing to an Or­gan­iz­a­tion of Eco­nom­ic Co­oper­a­tion and De­vel­op­ment study that ranked the U.S. 28th among 38 in­dus­tri­al­ized na­tions.

Chil­dren of sim­il­ar so­cioeco­nom­ic back­grounds but of dif­fer­ent races ar­rive in preschool and kinder­garten without much of an aca­dem­ic-skills gap, ac­cord­ing to a study by eco­nom­ists Ro­land Fry­er Jr. and Steven Levitt. But ra­cial and eth­nic dif­fer­ences emerge early in a child’s school­ing. By the spring of first grade, a gap between white, black, and Latino stu­dents is found at all in­come levels. As chil­dren ad­vance through school, the dis­par­ity between black and white stu­dents gen­er­ally grows — be­cause of ef­fect­ively se­greg­ated schools of un­even qual­ity, ex­perts say — while the dis­tance between white and Latino stu­dents shrinks but doesn’t dis­ap­pear.

The evid­ence is com­pel­ling that qual­ity preschool mat­ters. Na­tion­ally, poor chil­dren who are sub­par read­ers in third grade are 13 times less likely to gradu­ate from high school by age 19, ac­cord­ing to a new study is­sued by the Hechinger Re­port, a non­profit news or­gan­iz­a­tion. A re­cent Brook­ings study found that 76 per­cent of young­sters who entered first grade well pre­pared went on to per­form strongly on as­sess­ment tests in middle school, while only 41 per­cent of stu­dents who lacked a qual­ity preschool did the same. A long-term study of 123 chil­dren that began in the 1960s found that, at age 40, the ones who’d at­ten­ded a qual­ity preschool were more likely to hold a job, and at high­er pay, and were less likely to have com­mit­ted crimes than those who hadn’t.

“There are many stud­ies — and when I say many, I mean many, many stud­ies — that show that early in­ter­ven­tion, es­pe­cially be­fore age 5 or 8, can be po­ten­tially very ef­fect­ive,” said Seong Hyeok Moon, a Uni­versity of Chica­go eco­nom­ist. “You can do things for your kids that are hard — very hard — and more ex­pens­ive when they get older. That’s what makes qual­ity early edu­ca­tion a bar­gain.” Moon cites neur­o­lo­gic­al evid­ence that a child’s first five years are crit­ic­al; if cer­tain skills aren’t learned by then, re­search­ers doubt they can be picked up later.

In his State of the Uni­on ad­dress this year, Obama called for uni­ver­sal pre-K, cit­ing re­search by No­bel eco­nom­ist James Heck­man that every $1 in­ves­ted winds up sav­ing $7 that would oth­er­wise be spent on re­medi­al and spe­cial edu­ca­tion, pub­licly fin­anced health care, and oth­er so­cial sup­ports. Le­gis­latures in 23 states (as of 2010) provided enough fund­ing to cre­ate pre-K pro­grams that meet eight of 10 bench­marks for qual­ity, ac­cord­ing to the Pew Cen­ter on the States.

The most ef­fect­ive preschool pro­grams have highly qual­i­fied teach­ers, small classes, a full-day cur­riculum, and par­ent­al en­gage­ment, ac­cord­ing to To­moko Wakabayashi, dir­ect­or of re­search at High Scope Edu­ca­tion­al Re­search Found­a­tion, a Michigan-based non­profit that spe­cial­izes in early child­hood edu­ca­tion. Some of what chil­dren learn is prac­tic­al, not aca­dem­ic, as Sawhill points out; even so, know­ing how to sit still, pay at­ten­tion, and fol­low rules pre­pares stu­dents for aca­dem­ic suc­cess. In San Ant­o­nio, Kath­leen Bruck, the CEO of Pre-K 4 SA, is per­suaded that qual­ity pre-K pro­grams bring the biggest bang for the buck.


Dur­ing the 2009-10 school year, a teach­er in San Ant­o­nio’s East Cent­ral School Dis­trict ran a small but re­veal­ing pi­lot pro­ject. Jananne Healey had spent a year lead­ing a classroom of a loc­al charter school op­er­ated by the San Ant­o­nio af­fil­i­ate of the Know­ledge Is Power Pro­gram, a na­tion­al net­work, and wanted to bring some of its tech­niques in­to her East Cent­ral fifth-grade classroom.

At this city’s four KIPP academies, where 93 per­cent of the stu­dents are Latino and 84 per­cent are poor, more than three-fourths of the fifth-graders earned sat­is­fact­ory or ad­vanced scores on state read­ing and math as­sess­ment tests, in line with stu­dents in San Ant­o­nio’s wealth­i­est neigh­bor­hoods. KIPP of­fi­cials at­trib­ute this suc­cess, in large part, simply to hav­ing stu­dents spend more time in school — an av­er­age of 1,755 hours a year, some 585 more than in the tra­di­tion­al U.S. pub­lic school.

The 33 fifth-graders in Healey’s East Cent­ral pub­lic-school ex­per­i­ment spent most of the hours between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. in class. She offered ex­tra in­struc­tion, some­times one-on-one, and broke stu­dents in­to small groups to fo­cus on par­tic­u­lar needs. She mon­itored what chil­dren mastered and what left them con­fused. At year’s end, all but one of them passed their state as­sess­ment ex­ams. This year, the pre­dom­in­antly low-in­come school dis­trict ad­ded 20 minutes to every stu­dent’s school day and an hour of op­tion­al ex­tra time for stu­dents in high school.

“A few minutes of ex­tra time can have a huge im­pact,” said Ash­ley Cholis, the school dis­trict’s dir­ect­or of ex­ec­ut­ive ser­vices. “Twenty minutes may not sound like much, but that adds up to an hour and 40 minutes of ex­tra in­struc­tion time a week. When used cor­rectly, the way that we are work­ing very hard to do, that’s something.”

Cholis can look to a grow­ing body of re­search. A 2011 study of two dozen charter schools by the Na­tion­al Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Re­search found that for high-risk stu­dents, ex­tend­ing learn­ing time was more ef­fect­ive than re­du­cing class sizes, spend­ing more per pu­pil, or up­grad­ing teach­ers’ cre­den­tials. In a troubled middle school in Fall River, Mass., par­ents and school lead­ers ad­ded 300 hours to the school year start­ing in 2006 to as­sure more aca­dem­ic time and the sur­viv­al of art, mu­sic, and for­eign-lan­guage in­struc­tion. With­in four years, the stu­dents’ scores on state ex­ams rose by 34 per­cent­age points in math and by 10 points in read­ing.

Adding to a stu­dent’s school time isn’t al­ways pop­u­lar. “You are talk­ing about chan­ging school sched­ules and lo­gist­ic­al ar­range­ments that have, in many places, been largely left un­changed for more than 100 years,” said Jen­nifer Dav­is, pres­id­ent of the Na­tion­al Cen­ter on Time in Learn­ing, a Bo­ston-based non­profit. Teach­ers and their uni­ons are wary of longer hours, loc­al budgets can’t af­ford ex­tra com­pens­a­tion, and voters are re­luct­ant to raise teach­ers’ pay. Still, Dav­is said, “after years of hard work to isol­ate the ef­fects of ex­ten­ded learn­ing time, we have the proof.”


Mari­cella Perez is hardly the only high school­er in San Ant­o­nio in need of prac­tic­al help in get­ting to col­lege. “What we are do­ing in San Ant­o­nio is rolling up our sleeves and get­ting in­to the nitty-gritty,” said Eyra Perez (un­re­lated to Mari­cella), ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of San Ant­o­nio’s Edu­ca­tion Part­ner­ship.

One of the non­profit’s pro­jects is Café Col­lege, where stu­dents can get help in com­plet­ing ap­plic­a­tions and can meet with col­lege ad­mis­sions of­ficers. The pro­ject has trained dozens of busi­ness own­ers and fin­an­cial ad­visers to help stu­dents fill out the fed­er­al ap­plic­a­tion for fin­an­cial aid, which in­cludes pages of com­plic­ated ques­tions — boost­ing by al­most 6 per­cent the num­ber of San Ant­o­nio stu­dents who com­pleted the forms last year. Stu­dents who ap­ply for aid are half again as likely to en­roll in col­lege and nearly 75 per­cent more likely to fin­ish their fresh­man year, ac­cord­ing to an ana­lys­is in 2011 by the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Stu­dent Fin­an­cial Aid Ad­min­is­trat­ors. The num­bers are even high­er for low-in­come stu­dents.

Still, Eyra Perez is quick to ac­know­ledge that in­spir­ing more young San Ant­o­nians to at­tend col­lege won’t be easy. This city sees more of its stu­dents fin­ish high school than does the na­tion as a whole (86 per­cent versus 78 per­cent), but few­er of those gradu­ates go on to col­lege (50 per­cent versus 68 per­cent). Fix­ing that would re­quire cre­at­ing what Perez calls a “col­lege-go­ing and col­lege-com­plet­ing cul­ture,” in­clud­ing mak­ing it clear to par­ents and chil­dren which ca­reers are ex­pec­ted to blos­som or with­er.

Na­tion­ally, the once-vast gaps between the share of white, black, and Latino teen­agers head­ing to col­lege have nearly dis­ap­peared. In­deed, Latino high school gradu­ates out­paced whites (70 per­cent versus 67 per­cent) in start­ing col­lege in 2012, ac­cord­ing to fed­er­al data. Some 56 per­cent of black gradu­ates and 81 per­cent of Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans did the same.

However, these num­bers con­ceal the tenacity of edu­ca­tion­al in­equal­ity, as meas­ured by the sorts of col­leges in which stu­dents en­roll. Ac­cord­ing to a Geor­getown Uni­versity study this year, 82 per­cent of newly en­rolled white stu­dents went to se­lect­ive col­leges and uni­versit­ies between 1995 and 2009, com­pared with only 13 per­cent of Lati­nos and 9 per­cent of blacks. Some 72 per­cent of His­pan­ic fresh­men and 68 per­cent of first-year Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans head to less-se­lect­ive schools or those that ac­cept any­one with a high school dip­loma (or the equi­val­ent) and a check­book. 

This isn’t simply a mat­ter of prestige. Highly se­lect­ive schools tend to boast lar­ger en­dow­ments, spend more per pu­pil, and of­fer more fin­an­cial aid as grants rather than loans. This in­creases the chances, the Geor­getown study found, that their stu­dents will fin­ish col­lege and earn sub­stan­tially more money over their life­times than stu­dents who at­tend less-se­lect­ive schools. 

Stella Flores, an as­sist­ant pro­fess­or of pub­lic policy and high­er edu­ca­tion at Vander­bilt Uni­versity, says the pop­u­lar no­tion that a two-year com­munity col­lege is al­ways the prag­mat­ic, frugal route is too simplist­ic. Black and Latino stu­dents, she says, are of­ten en­cour­aged to at­tend schools — com­munity col­leges and for-profit private col­leges — in which gradu­ation rates lag.

Con­sider the ex­per­i­ence of Daniel Flores (no re­la­tion to Stella), a nat­ive of Peru who gradu­ated from San Ant­o­nio’s Earl War­ren High School in 2009 with a 4.0 GPA. His guid­ance coun­selor told him not to both­er ap­ply­ing to a pro­gram that con­nects prom­ising minor­ity stu­dents with elite col­leges will­ing to provide schol­ar­ships — that a loc­al or com­munity col­lege seemed a bet­ter fit, where “someone like [me] can get in,” as Flores re­called. He ap­plied any­way, with a few teach­ers’ help. One af­ter­noon, he got home to find his moth­er in tears: North­west­ern Uni­versity had offered him ad­mis­sion on a full schol­ar­ship.

“I knew, even at 17, what this was go­ing to mean for my life,” the 21-year-old Flores says now. He will gradu­ate in June and then at­tend North­west­ern’s busi­ness school.


Stu­dents in com­munity col­leges, where 45 per­cent of the na­tion’s un­der­gradu­ates en­roll, are 9 per­cent to 14 per­cent less likely to earn a dip­loma — by Stella Flores’s ana­lys­is of fed­er­al data — than stu­dents at four-year schools. Among stu­dents who score in the top half on en­trance ex­ams, the Geor­getown study found, 51 per­cent of whites earn a bach­el­or’s de­gree, com­pared with 34 per­cent of blacks and 32 per­cent of His­pan­ics.

The biggest reas­on for these dis­par­it­ies is that so many stu­dents ar­rive un­pre­pared, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent study by the Uni­versity of Mis­souri and the Na­tion­al Bur­eau of Eco­nom­ic Re­search. It found that the dif­fer­ence in aca­dem­ic skills of in­com­ing stu­dents ac­counts for 65 per­cent of the gap in gradu­ation rates between white and minor­ity wo­men, and for 86 per­cent of the gap among men.

Re­medi­al courses, which of­fer no cred­it to­ward a de­gree, must be taken by 28 to 40 per­cent of all stu­dents who en­roll in col­lege and of­ten by 50 per­cent of those at­tend­ing com­munity col­leges, the Na­tion­al Con­fer­ence of State Le­gis­latures has found. Stu­dents who need this sort of help are more likely to drop out. Ef­forts to im­prove re­medi­al edu­ca­tion in­clude short-but-in­tens­ive courses — al­gebra in a single term, say — and classes that in­teg­rate re­medi­al train­ing in­to cred­it-bear­ing courses. These op­tions seem to in­crease the chance that stu­dents re­turn to school the fol­low­ing year, ac­cord­ing to Thomas Bailey, a re­search­er at Columbia Uni­versity’s Teach­ers Col­lege.

“We should not nix com­munity col­lege,” Bailey said. “They are still the last and only shot for some stu­dents — in many cases, stu­dents that have been failed all along the line.”

It’s un­for­tu­nate that so many dis­ad­vant­aged stu­dents reach col­lege age fa­cing their last shot at pre­par­ing for a life of eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity. All too of­ten, their pre­vi­ous chances have fallen short, and no one has stepped in at the right times to help. Re­search has con­firmed what we know by in­stinct: Start­ing out badly in life makes it harder to suc­ceed as an adult. The surest route to a middle-class life is to start out well. (See pp. 10-11.)

But for young Amer­ic­ans who don’t, at which points does it make the most sense to step in? By the time a stu­dent reaches col­lege, try­ing to make up for past de­fi­cien­cies is ex­pens­ive and less likely to suc­ceed. The surest and cheapest way to as­sure dis­ad­vant­aged youths a place in an eco­nomy that needs them is by step­ping in early rather than late. Early in­ter­ven­tions can have cas­cad­ing ef­fects, schol­ars ex­plain, be­cause they stave off the need for in­ter­ven­tions later.

The op­tim­al solu­tion was on dis­play one re­cent morn­ing out­side the Pre-K 4 SA cen­ter, as a fath­er fumbled with a seat belt.

“Come on, Daddy,” his 4-year-old daugh­ter ex­hor­ted in Span­ish, tug­ging at her fath­er’s hand. “They need me in my class.”

We all do.

The au­thor is a New York journ­al­ist who is writ­ing a book on race and eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity, to be pub­lished next year.

CLA­RI­FIC­A­TION: The Hechinger Re­port was in­ac­cur­ately de­scribed in an earli­er ver­sion of this story; it is a non­profit news or­gan­iz­a­tion.

What We're Following See More »
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
20 hours ago
Steele Says Follow the Money
21 hours ago

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
22 hours ago

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Kislyak Says Trump Campaign Contacts Too Numerous to List
22 hours ago

"Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said on Wednesday that it would take him more than 20 minutes to name all of the Trump officials he's met with or spoken to on the phone. ... Kislyak made the remarks in a sprawling interview with Russia-1, a popular state-owned Russian television channel."

Sabato Moves Alabama to “Lean Democrat”
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.