Political Connections

California Holds the Key to the House

Democrats see a chance to pick up seats after all seven Republicans in districts carried by Clinton voted for the GOP’s controversial health care bill.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin
May 24, 2017, 8 p.m.

Des­pite its size, Cali­for­nia has be­come little more than a fun­drais­ing stop in na­tion­al elec­tions be­cause it has grown so re­li­ably Demo­crat­ic over the past two dec­ades. But the razor-thin vote in the House to re­peal and re­place the Af­ford­able Care Act has moved the state in­to an un­ac­cus­tomed po­s­i­tion: ground zero in next year’s battle for con­trol of Con­gress.

Even be­fore the vote, the state began re­gis­ter­ing on the 2018 radar be­cause sev­en of its House Re­pub­lic­ans rep­res­ent dis­tricts that backed Hil­lary Clin­ton over Don­ald Trump. That’s nearly one-third of the Re­pub­lic­ans in dis­tricts car­ried by Clin­ton.

When all sev­en un­ex­pec­tedly voted for the GOP health care bill, Demo­crats saw a path to cap­ture the 24 seats the party needs to re­gain a House ma­jor­ity. “They are go­ing to have to take a big chunk of these seats,” said Bill Car­rick, a long­time South­ern Cali­for­nia-based Demo­crat­ic strategist. “If you don’t win seats here … then you have to chase South­ern seats and rur­al Mid­west­ern seats.”

The un­an­im­ous sup­port from the “Cali­for­nia Sev­en” for the deeply con­tro­ver­sial re­peal bill was stun­ning in two re­spects. First, it set them apart from the 16 oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans in Clin­ton dis­tricts, only sev­en of whom sup­por­ted the bill. (The Cali­for­nia bloc may have partly re­flec­ted per­son­al loy­alty to House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy of Bakersfield.)

Second, those re­peal votes came even though nearly 4 mil­lion Cali­for­ni­ans gained cov­er­age un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, and the num­ber of un­in­sured dropped by bet­ter than half, more than in any oth­er large state. Cali­for­nia adults are now far less likely than people in demo­graph­ic­ally sim­il­ar Texas and Flor­ida to re­port dif­fi­culty pay­ing med­ic­al bills or delay­ing needed care be­cause of cost, ac­cord­ing to a Com­mon­wealth Fund re­port.

The Cali­for­nia Sev­en rep­res­ent two broad geo­graph­ic areas. Five of them hold seats in South­ern Cali­for­nia: Reps. Ed Royce, Mimi Wal­ters, and Dana Rohra­bach­er in Or­ange County; Rep. Dar­rell Issa in a dis­trict that straddles Or­ange and San Diego counties; and Rep. Steve Knight in the north­ern Los Angeles ex­urbs. Reps. Jeff Den­ham and Dav­id Valadao rep­res­ent seats in the ag­ri­cul­tur­al Cent­ral Val­ley.

Privately, Demo­crats ac­know­ledge that al­low­ing all sev­en to sur­vive in 2016 was a missed op­por­tun­ity. With Trump’s in­su­lar na­tion­al­ism deeply un­pop­u­lar in glob­al-fa­cing Cali­for­nia, Clin­ton won the state by more than any Demo­crat since Frank­lin Roosevelt in 1936—and be­came the first party nom­in­ee since FDR to carry Or­ange County, once a con­ser­vat­ive bas­tion. The SoCal dis­tricts held by Wal­ters, Issa, Rohra­bach­er, and Royce were among the 30 na­tion­wide where Trump’s per­form­ance de­teri­or­ated most from Mitt Rom­ney’s in 2012. Clin­ton also routed Trump by over 15 points in Valadao’s dis­trict and beat him soundly in Knight’s. (She car­ried Den­ham’s seat only nar­rowly.)

Yet Demo­crats last year moun­ted ser­i­ous, well-fun­ded chal­lenges only against Knight, Issa, and Den­ham. Demo­crats should be able to re­cruit more con­sist­ently strong can­did­ates for 2018 be­cause the state fil­ing dead­line for last year’s elec­tion, in March, fell be­fore it was clear Trump would win the GOP nom­in­a­tion. And, es­pe­cially after the health care vote, these races are guar­an­teed to draw more loc­al and na­tion­al me­dia and fun­drais­ing at­ten­tion than in 2016.

With the state trend­ing so Demo­crat­ic, Re­pub­lic­ans in the Cali­for­nia Sev­en dis­tricts have been try­ing to make their races all about loc­al is­sues. Even Demo­crats ac­know­ledge that sev­er­al of the Re­pub­lic­ans have ef­fect­ively con­nec­ted them­selves to their dis­tricts. That’s es­pe­cially true for Valadao and Den­ham, whose dis­tricts have voted Demo­crat­ic in all three pres­id­en­tial races since 2008. Knight and Issa also tried to es­tab­lish dis­tance from Trump by sup­port­ing an in­de­pend­ent coun­sel on Rus­si­an elec­tion med­dling be­fore the Justice De­part­ment named former FBI Dir­ect­or Robert Mueller.

But main­tain­ing sep­ar­a­tion from Trump will grow more dif­fi­cult for the Cali­for­nia Sev­en as they cast votes on Trump pri­or­it­ies, like the deeply con­ser­vat­ive budget he re­leased Tues­day. “In ’16, polling showed voters sep­ar­ated Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates from Trump, and that helped all of these in­cum­bents,” said Kev­in Spillane, a Cali­for­nia GOP con­sult­ant. “Now Trump [will] be a cent­ral factor in these cam­paigns.”

The Cali­for­nia Sev­en will be­ne­fit in 2018 if turnout among strongly Demo­crat­ic minor­it­ies and young people con­tin­ues its usu­al fal­loff from pres­id­en­tial elec­tions. But Census fig­ures show that in al­most all of these dis­tricts, the per­cent­age of minor­it­ies and col­lege-edu­cated whites—two groups per­sist­ently hos­tile to Trump—is grow­ing: Minor­it­ies now rep­res­ent over half the pop­u­la­tion in the Valadao, Den­ham, Royce, and Knight seats; just un­der half in Wal­ters’s; and around two-fifths in Issa’s and Rohra­bach­er’s. “These dis­tricts aren’t the dis­tricts most of them got elec­ted in,” Car­rick noted.

From its voters through its elec­ted of­fi­cials, no state has ex­pressed more vehe­ment op­pos­i­tion to Trump than Cali­for­nia. And now, un­ex­pec­tedly, no state has a great­er op­por­tun­ity to em­power Demo­crats to hobble his agenda by win­ning back the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives.

What We're Following See More »
Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
1 days ago
Biden Running
1 days ago
Mueller Made 14 Criminal Referrals
2 days ago
The Report Is Here
2 days ago
Nadler Asks Mueller to Testify By May 23
2 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.