Facial-Recognition Technologies Spur Privacy Concerns

In this photo illustration the Social networking site Facebook is reflected in the eye of a man on March 25, 2009 in London, England. The British government has made proposals which would force Social networking websites such as Facebook to pass on details of users, friends and contacts to help fight terrorism.
National Journal
Laura Ryan
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Laura Ryan
Dec. 3, 2013, 6:40 a.m.

As fa­cial-read­ing tech­no­logy gains mo­mentum, poli­cy­makers are step­ping up to check in­her­ent pri­vacy risks con­nec­ted to the tech­no­logy.

The Na­tion­al Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions and In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion an­nounced Tues­day that fa­cial-read­ing tech­no­logy will be the next top­ic of its on­go­ing pri­vacy study, which brings to­geth­er stake­hold­ers in the pub­lic and private sec­tors to cre­ate en­force­able rules in the busi­ness con­text. The an­nounce­ment comes two weeks after Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., pressed the agency to take up the is­sue in re­sponse to Face­book’s pri­vacy policy change to al­low the use of user pro­file pho­tos for its fa­cial-re­cog­ni­tion tech­no­logy.

“[Fa­cial-re­cog­ni­tion tech­no­logy] has ser­i­ous im­plic­a­tions for con­sumer pri­vacy and per­son­al safety,” Franken said in a let­ter to NTIA. “Un­for­tu­nately, our pri­vacy laws provide no ex­press pro­tec­tions for fa­cial-re­cog­ni­tion data; un­der cur­rent law, any com­pany can use fa­cial-re­cog­ni­tion tech­no­logy on any­one without get­ting their per­mis­sion—and without any mean­ing­ful trans­par­ency.”

The tech­no­logy presents nu­mer­ous op­por­tun­it­ies to make cus­tom­er ser­vice seam­less, im­prove iden­ti­fic­a­tion, and cre­ate op­por­tun­it­ies for in­nov­a­tion. For ex­ample, The New York Times re­ports face-read­ing soft­ware could de­tect if a stu­dent was con­fused and provide them with ex­tra tu­tor­ing.

But as fa­cial data is col­lec­ted and be­comes read­ily avail­able, there is a de­fi­ciency of laws to pro­tect a user’s con­trol over the use and dis­tri­bu­tion of this in­form­a­tion.

“Di­git­al im­ages are in­creas­ingly avail­able, and the im­port­ance of se­cur­ing fa­ce­prints and en­sur­ing con­sumers’ ap­pro­pri­ate con­trol over their data is clear,” said Lawrence Strick­ling, as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary for com­mu­nic­a­tions and in­form­a­tion for the Com­merce De­part­g­ment and NTIA’s ad­min­is­trat­or.

Stake­hold­ers will con­vene for the first meet­ing on Feb. 6, with ad­di­tion­al meet­ings to be sched­uled throughout the spring and sum­mer.

The Com­merce De­part­ment agency began the pri­vacy multistake­hold­er pro­cess in 2012 as part of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ef­fort to im­ple­ment a Con­sumer Pri­vacy Bill of Rights. Its first top­ic—pri­vacy no­ti­fic­a­tions on mo­bile devices—took more than a year to com­plete.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
9 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×