Smart Ideas: Macron Is Not the Leader Russia Was Looking For

AP Photo/Michael A. Mariant
Add to Briefcase
May 9, 2017, 8 p.m.

Don't cut foreign aid; cut payments to Big Ag

Vin­cent H. Smith and Ry­an Nab­il, writ­ing for U.S. News & World Re­port

As the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion weighs cut­ting for­eign aid pay­ments in or­der to fin­ance de­fense spend­ing, it should look to an­oth­er area of the budget that’s ripe for cost sav­ings: fed­er­al farm sub­sidies. “These pro­grams either waste re­sources or provide re­sources to wealthy groups who have no need for sub­sidies. … Many farm pro­grams could be ter­min­ated or mod­i­fied in ways that would cre­ate budget sav­ings with al­most no ef­fect on Amer­ic­an farm­ing. As a start, re­peal­ing and re­pla­cing the crop in­sur­ance pro­gram with a more ra­tion­al dis­aster aid pro­gram, end­ing an in­ef­fect­ive con­ser­va­tion pro­gram and cap­ping two farm sub­sidy giveaway pro­grams, would al­low the new ad­min­is­tra­tion to se­cure $50 bil­lion in budget sav­ings over the next five years with no dis­cern­ible ef­fect on U.S. ag­ri­cul­ture or the food dis­tri­bu­tion sys­tem.”

Trump's Twitter feed is a valuable too for foreign intel

Tom Nich­ols, writ­ing on Twit­ter

As a former So­viet ana­lyst, “I would have giv­en any­thing for An­drop­ov or Gorbachev to give me a run­ning nar­rat­ive of their mood and in­ner thoughts in real time.” But this is pre­cisely what Pres­id­ent Trump provides for­eign in­tel­li­gence ser­vices via his Twit­ter feed. “This is the kind of in­stant lead­er­ship por­trait that I wouldn’t want a for­eign na­tion to have when gam­ing out a crisis with us.” It shows how the pres­id­ent re­acts un­der stress and pro­cesses in­form­a­tion. “Sol­id gold info.”

Russia's influence campaign in France backfired

Max de Haldevang, writ­ing for Quartz Just a month ago, Rus­sia seemed likely to be a big win­ner re­gard­less of who the French people elec­ted as their next pres­id­ent. Pri­or to the run­off, three of the four front-run­ners were pro-Rus­sia, and the fourth, the even­tu­al win­ner Em­manuel Mac­ron, “was hardly a hawk.” But Mo­scow just couldn’t help it­self, and much like dur­ing the U.S. elec­tions, launched “an ex­traordin­ary pro­pa­ganda and cy­ber cam­paign against the cent­rist in­sur­gent.” Not only did Rus­sia’s cam­paign against Mac­ron fail, as evid­enced by his land­slide vic­tory, it seems likely to have back­fired. “[W]hen Mac­ron vis­ited Mo­scow as eco­nomy min­is­ter just over a year ago he said he wanted to work to lift EU sanc­tions on the coun­try.” Now, in­stead of see­ing the pos­sib­il­ity of lift­ing sanc­tions as eco­nom­ic­ally be­ne­fi­cial, Mac­ron is likely to view Rus­sia as a geo­pol­it­ic­al foe. When he meets with Ger­man Chan­cel­lor An­gela Merkel next month, ex­pect Mac­ron to emerge with Rus­si­an sanc­tions still very much in­tact.
Russian Economics Minister Alexei Ulyukayev (left) and French Economics Minister Emmanuel Macron talk to each other during the Russian-French Council of Economic, Financial, Industrial and Trade Issues session in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Jan. 25, 2016. AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.