A senior Energy Department official is giving a political assist to the Environmental Protection Agency by vouching for carbon-trapping technology that EPA is essentially requiring for new coal-fired power plants.
Christopher Smith, the acting head of DOE’s fossil-energy office, said the technology is ready and pledged to help speed its market penetration in written comments to Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee lawmakers.
The comments responded to questions from senators — including Republican critics of EPA’s climate regulations — as part of Smith’s nomination to formally become DOE’s assistant secretary for fossil energy.
“[Carbon capture and storage] technology has been and continues to be deployed in a range of projects. There are 12 large-scale CCS projects in operation worldwide today,” Smith said in the comments, which were submitted late last month and provided by the committee on Tuesday.
He continued, “If confirmed, I will continue to work with industry in advancing CCS technologies to continue reducing the cost of capture, making CCS more efficient, and preparing for wider-scale deployment in future years.”
His comments arrive as Republicans and some coal-country Democrats are hammering EPA’s proposed carbon-emissions rules for future power plants.
The rules, floated in June, effectively require coal-fired plants to trap and store a substantial portion of their emissions. Critics of the proposal call it a de facto ban on new coal plants, asserting that the technology is nowhere close to widespread readiness.
Smith, in response to a question from Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., cautioned that his agency does not determine whether a technology is “adequately demonstrated” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act. That’s EPA’s call.
But he noted, “All components of CCS, including large-scale CO2 capture, transportation, and multimillion-ton per year injection, have been demonstrated worldwide and in the U.S. for many years.”
What We're Following See More »
"Sen. Lindsay Graham said he is '100 percent behind' embattled Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and said there would be 'holy hell to pay' if President Donald Trump fires him. Graham also said that if the president went after special prosecutor Robert Mueller, who’s directing the investigation into possible contacts between Trump’s circle and Russia, that could be the 'beginning of the end of the Trump presidency, unless Mueller did something wrong.'"
"With little pomp or circumstance, Sarah Huckabee Sanders stepped up to the briefing room podium and got straight to business Friday, reading announcements about "Made in America Week" and a new executive order on defense. Minutes later, newly minted communications director Anthony Scaramucci announced she was formally taking over as White House press secretary. In the aftermath of a chaotic communications staff shakeup at the White House last week, there was little attention paid to a new milestone as Sanders assumed the role."
"The highest ranking military officer in the country said that the military’s transgender policy won’t actively change until President Trump sends specific directions to the Pentagon. 'There will be no modifications to the current policy until the president’s direction has been received by the secretary of defense and the secretary has issued implementation guidance,' Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford wrote in a letter."
"A long-simmering feud between two of President Trump’s top advisers reached a boiling point Thursday, as White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci publicly insinuated that chief of staff Reince Priebus is a leaker."