Perriello Crushes Ambulance in Health Care Ad

Northam and Perriello clashed on free community college, pipelines, and electability in their second debate.

Add to Briefcase
Zach C. Cohen
May 5, 2017, 10:18 a.m.

Former Rep. Tom Per­ri­ello (D) re­leased a new TV ad Thursday in which he ac­cuses Re­pub­lic­ans of “try­ing to do this to af­ford­able health care,” as a com­pact­or crushes an am­bu­lance.

He goes on to say: “I’m Tom Per­ri­ello, and in Con­gress, I voted for Obama­care be­cause it was wrong that a mil­lion Vir­gini­ans wer­en’t covered, while in­sur­ance com­pan­ies held all the power. … To­geth­er, we can stop Don­ald Trump, raise wages, and build an eco­nomy that works for every­one. And we’ll make sure this nev­er hap­pens in Vir­gin­ia.”

“The ad, titled ‘Am­bu­lance,’ was filmed in one live take. It will be­gin run­ning next week.” (re­lease)

Lt. Gov. Ral­ph Northam (D) “re­leased a state­ment call­ing the House vote ‘the most spine­less, un­prin­cipled cruelty that I have ever seen come from a le­gis­lat­ive body.’” Former RNC Chair Ed Gillespie (R) and state Sen. Frank Wag­n­er (R), “called the vote an im­port­ant first step.” (Hamp­ton Roads Daily Press)

FIGHT NIGHT. Per­ri­ello and Northam sparred over fund­ing for com­munity col­lege in their second de­bate on Thursday. After Lt. Gov. Ral­ph Northam (D) said re­quir­ing pub­lic ser­vice in ex­change for free com­munity col­lege would pay off the pro­gram by grow­ing the tax base, Per­ri­ello said Northam’s plan “makes it more ex­pens­ive” by cre­at­ing a new “com­munity ser­vice” pro­gram. Northam countered that Per­ri­ello was say­ing vet­er­ans like him­self “shouldn’t serve in the United States Army” be­cause of cost of the after-de­ploy­ment be­ne­fits. “I think you just lost the audi­ence, doc­tor,” Per­ri­ello replied.

Northam chal­lenged Per­ri­ello’s plan to raise taxes and pass a con­sti­tu­tion­al amend­ment pro­tect­ing abor­tion rights, cit­ing Re­pub­lic­an con­trol of the le­gis­lature. (WD­BJ)

“Northam avoided tak­ing a firm stance for or against nat­ur­al gas pipelines. … ‘Re­gard­ing the pipeline, if it moves for­ward, it needs to be done with trans­par­ency and sci­ence,’ he said. Northam ad­ded state law­makers need to be con­cerned with prop­erty rights and the en­vir­on­ment should the pro­ject be ap­proved.” (Roan­oke Times)

“Northam and … Per­ri­ello both claimed Thursday to be Vir­gin­ia Demo­crats’ best op­tion for win­ning over rur­al voters who sup­por­ted Pres­id­ent Don­ald Trump in last year’s elec­tion.” (AP)

SNEAK PEEK. A memo pre­pared by the state Re­pub­lic­an Party in­dic­ates it will at­tempt to re­gister “thou­sands of voters in rur­al parts of the state, with the as­sump­tion that they will vote Re­pub­lic­an. … A party data­base sug­gests that there are 200,000 un­re­gistered voters who are likely to vote Re­pub­lic­an in the Shen­an­doah Val­ley, South­w­est and south of the James River. … Vir­gin­ia does not re­gister voters by party, and any­one can vote in either party’s primary elec­tions.”

“Re­pub­lic­an gubernat­ori­al can­did­ates … can’t af­ford to in­vest in re­gis­tra­tion drives, the let­ter says. And out­side groups such as PACs and 501(c) char­it­ies face dif­fi­culties in sign­ing up people for a par­tic­u­lar party … [b]ecause of their tax-free status. … That in­dir­ect ap­proach winds up mak­ing it cost more to re­gister voters through out­side groups — from $35 to $50 per voter, ac­cord­ing to the let­ter. The state Re­pub­lic­an Party, on the oth­er hand, faces no such re­stric­tions and can drive re­gis­tra­tion at a much cheap­er cost — $20 or less per voter. So the let­ter asks donors to help the party raise $250,000 by June 1 and $2 mil­lion by the Novem­ber elec­tion to re­gister and turn out 100,000 voters.” (Wash­ing­ton Post)


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.