It’s been three years since President Obama signed a hugely complicated health care law. One of these days, we’ll figure out what to call it.
After rejecting “Obamacare” as pejorative in 2010, Democrats embraced the term in 2012. And now some of them are rejecting it again.
“Yeah, I wish I hadn’t called it Obamacare before because that has politicized it, and has been used by Republicans as a pejorative term,” House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., told reporters Tuesday after they noticed he was referring to the law only as the Affordable Care Act.
Hoyer isn’t the first Democrat to reverse course on the O-word. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., corrected David Gregory during a recent Meet the Press appearance when he called the law “Obamacare,” insisting that it’s the Affordable Care Act.
The Democratic National Committee, on the other hand, is still highlighting a “This Is Obamacare” feature at the top of its website. And good luck un-seeing all those “I (Heart) Obamacare” bumper stickers from the 2012 campaign.
The president himself made a point of using the term during the 2012 campaign. He used it again during a speech Tuesday, although he eschewed “Obamacare” in his last public remarks about the law and his administration reportedly switched to Affordable Care Act in its talking points to surrogates.
“Obamacare” did begin as a negative label used only by Republicans. Liberal Democrats, though, pushed the White House to embrace it, arguing that the term wasn’t going anywhere so Obama might as well own it. It gained widespread acceptance in large part simply because Democrats were using it all the time in off-the-cuff comments. But amid the troubled rollout of HealthCare.gov and the Democratic effort to frame health insurance as a personal issue rather than a political one, the term is falling out of favor again. “The Affordable Care Act” polls slightly better than “Obamacare,” even though they are the same thing.
Hoyer told reporters Tuesday he agrees with Obama’s assessment: Republicans will call it “Obamacare” unless and until people start to like it. He drew an analogy to the dramatic football game Saturday night in which Auburn University pulled off a last-second win over Alabama.
“Everyone was talking about the Alabama game—right up until Auburn won. That’s your answer,” he said.
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.
Republican House leaders are planning on taking up a vote to renew the Iran Sanctions Act as soon as the lame-duck session begins in mid-November. The law, which expires on Dec. 31, permits a host of sanctions against Iran's industries, defense, and government. The renewal will likely pass the House, but its status is unclear once it reaches the Senate, and a spokesman from the White House refused to say whether President Obama would sign it into law.