Dems Can’t Make Up Their Minds About ‘Obamacare’ Label

“Obamacare” vs. “Affordable Care Act” debate is still going.

Steny Hoyer holds a press conference on an extension to the payroll tax cuts being debated in congress on Thursday, Dec. 22, 2011.
National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sam Baker
Dec. 3, 2013, 11:08 a.m.

It’s been three years since Pres­id­ent Obama signed a hugely com­plic­ated health care law. One of these days, we’ll fig­ure out what to call it.

After re­ject­ing “Obama­care” as pe­jor­at­ive in 2010, Demo­crats em­braced the term in 2012. And now some of them are re­ject­ing it again.

“Yeah, I wish I hadn’t called it Obama­care be­fore be­cause that has politi­cized it, and has been used by Re­pub­lic­ans as a pe­jor­at­ive term,” House Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er, D-Md., told re­port­ers Tues­day after they no­ticed he was re­fer­ring to the law only as the Af­ford­able Care Act.

Hoy­er isn’t the first Demo­crat to re­verse course on the O-word. House Demo­crat­ic Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal­if., cor­rec­ted Dav­id Gregory dur­ing a re­cent Meet the Press ap­pear­ance when he called the law “Obama­care,” in­sist­ing that it’s the Af­ford­able Care Act.

The Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee, on the oth­er hand, is still high­light­ing a “This Is Obama­care” fea­ture at the top of its web­site. And good luck un-see­ing all those “I (Heart) Obama­care” bump­er stick­ers from the 2012 cam­paign.

The pres­id­ent him­self made a point of us­ing the term dur­ing the 2012 cam­paign. He used it again dur­ing a speech Tues­day, al­though he es­chewed “Obama­care” in his last pub­lic re­marks about the law and his ad­min­is­tra­tion re­portedly switched to Af­ford­able Care Act in its talk­ing points to sur­rog­ates.

“Obama­care” did be­gin as a neg­at­ive la­bel used only by Re­pub­lic­ans. Lib­er­al Demo­crats, though, pushed the White House to em­brace it, ar­guing that the term wasn’t go­ing any­where so Obama might as well own it. It gained wide­spread ac­cept­ance in large part simply be­cause Demo­crats were us­ing it all the time in off-the-cuff com­ments. But amid the troubled rol­lout of Health­Care.gov and the Demo­crat­ic ef­fort to frame health in­sur­ance as a per­son­al is­sue rather than a polit­ic­al one, the term is fall­ing out of fa­vor again. “The Af­ford­able Care Act” polls slightly bet­ter than “Obama­care,” even though they are the same thing.

Hoy­er told re­port­ers Tues­day he agrees with Obama’s as­sess­ment: Re­pub­lic­ans will call it “Obama­care” un­less and un­til people start to like it. He drew an ana­logy to the dra­mat­ic foot­ball game Sat­urday night in which Au­burn Uni­versity pulled off a last-second win over Alabama.

“Every­one was talk­ing about the Alabama game—right up un­til Au­burn won. That’s your an­swer,” he said.

Elahe Izadii contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
2 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
2 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login