Dems Can’t Make Up Their Minds About ‘Obamacare’ Label

“Obamacare” vs. “Affordable Care Act” debate is still going.

Steny Hoyer holds a press conference on an extension to the payroll tax cuts being debated in congress on Thursday, Dec. 22, 2011.
National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sam Baker
Dec. 3, 2013, 11:08 a.m.

It’s been three years since Pres­id­ent Obama signed a hugely com­plic­ated health care law. One of these days, we’ll fig­ure out what to call it.

After re­ject­ing “Obama­care” as pe­jor­at­ive in 2010, Demo­crats em­braced the term in 2012. And now some of them are re­ject­ing it again.

“Yeah, I wish I hadn’t called it Obama­care be­fore be­cause that has politi­cized it, and has been used by Re­pub­lic­ans as a pe­jor­at­ive term,” House Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er, D-Md., told re­port­ers Tues­day after they no­ticed he was re­fer­ring to the law only as the Af­ford­able Care Act.

Hoy­er isn’t the first Demo­crat to re­verse course on the O-word. House Demo­crat­ic Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal­if., cor­rec­ted Dav­id Gregory dur­ing a re­cent Meet the Press ap­pear­ance when he called the law “Obama­care,” in­sist­ing that it’s the Af­ford­able Care Act.

The Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee, on the oth­er hand, is still high­light­ing a “This Is Obama­care” fea­ture at the top of its web­site. And good luck un-see­ing all those “I (Heart) Obama­care” bump­er stick­ers from the 2012 cam­paign.

The pres­id­ent him­self made a point of us­ing the term dur­ing the 2012 cam­paign. He used it again dur­ing a speech Tues­day, al­though he es­chewed “Obama­care” in his last pub­lic re­marks about the law and his ad­min­is­tra­tion re­portedly switched to Af­ford­able Care Act in its talk­ing points to sur­rog­ates.

“Obama­care” did be­gin as a neg­at­ive la­bel used only by Re­pub­lic­ans. Lib­er­al Demo­crats, though, pushed the White House to em­brace it, ar­guing that the term wasn’t go­ing any­where so Obama might as well own it. It gained wide­spread ac­cept­ance in large part simply be­cause Demo­crats were us­ing it all the time in off-the-cuff com­ments. But amid the troubled rol­lout of Health­Care.gov and the Demo­crat­ic ef­fort to frame health in­sur­ance as a per­son­al is­sue rather than a polit­ic­al one, the term is fall­ing out of fa­vor again. “The Af­ford­able Care Act” polls slightly bet­ter than “Obama­care,” even though they are the same thing.

Hoy­er told re­port­ers Tues­day he agrees with Obama’s as­sess­ment: Re­pub­lic­ans will call it “Obama­care” un­less and un­til people start to like it. He drew an ana­logy to the dra­mat­ic foot­ball game Sat­urday night in which Au­burn Uni­versity pulled off a last-second win over Alabama.

“Every­one was talk­ing about the Alabama game—right up un­til Au­burn won. That’s your an­swer,” he said.

Elahe Izadii contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
OPEN HEARING AT 10 AM
Ford Agrees to Testify on Thursday
59 minutes ago
THE LATEST
Source:
WAS LEADING COMMUNICATIONS EFFORTS
Judiciary Committee Staffer Quits Amid Harassment Claims
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Garrett Ventry, a communications adviser for the Senate Judiciary Committee's GOP majority who was leading the committee's response to allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, has stepped down."

Source:
WEDNESDAY?
Judiciary Committee Counteroffers on Ford Appearance
2 days ago
THE LATEST
THIS WILL NOT HELP
Trump Says Ford Should Have Filed Charges 36 Years Ago
2 days ago
THE LATEST
DOESN'T WANT TO BE NEAR KAVANAUGH
Ford Would Like to Testify on Thursday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault in the 1980s, is reportedly willing to publicly testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee next Thursday. Lawyers for Ford told committee staffers during a call Thursday evening to negotiate details of a potential hearing that she wanted Kavanaugh to testify before her and she does not want to be in the same room as him, according to multiple reports."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login