Report Backs Decision to Spend $36 Million on a Building in Afghanistan

Other officials suggest the command headquarters is unnecessary.

Then-Maj. Gen. Richard P. Mills tried to cancel the project in favor of a smaller building, but his request was eventually denied.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
Dec. 4, 2013, 3:32 a.m.

A re­port by an Army gen­er­al backed a de­cision to spend $36 mil­lion on a com­mand headquar­ters in south­west­ern Afgh­anistan, The Wash­ing­ton Post re­ports. The re­port found that the build­ing needs ad­di­tion­al work, but after that troops should move in.

The de­cision, however, has per­plexed oth­er seni­or mil­it­ary of­ficers who sug­ges­ted that they didn’t need the build­ing, which can hold up to 1,500 people. Un­der cur­rent White House con­sid­er­a­tions, Camp Leath­er­neck, where the headquar­ters is loc­ated, will be closed by this time next year.

“The Army built us an enorm­ous white ele­phant, and now, to save face, we’re be­ing told to waste more money and time to move in­to it,” said a seni­or Mar­ine of­ficer. “We don’t need it. We’re pack­ing up there.”

An­oth­er Mar­ine gen­er­al, who over­sees south­w­est Afgh­anistan, re­ferred to the build­ing as a “money drain.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.